Tuesday, May 4, 2021

A NOTE ON SANAULI

 A note on Chariot Burials found at Sinauli district Baghpat U.P. 

Fig. No. 01: S. K. Manjul and Arvin Manjul with excavation team at Sinauli, Baghpat U.P. (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India)

The Chariot Burials : Recently chariots were found by S. K. Manjul, Director of Institute of Archaeology A.S.I (Archaeological Survey of India), Arvin Manjul, Superintending Archaeologist, A.S.I and their team, during excavations at the site of Sinauli, Baghpat U.P. in 2018 (Fig. No. 01). This site was earlier excavated by D. V. Sharma and his team in the years 2003-04 & 2005-06, revealing a necropolis.

Fig. No. 02: S. K. Manjul at the excavation site, Sinauli, Distt. Baghpat U.P. (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India)

The present excavations have yielded chariots buried with dead bodies, which gives totally new dimension to the associated culture and the old debate about use of horse in India. We will examine these points in the following pages:

 
Fig. No. 03: Legged Coffin with carvings on the lid (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

The excavations at Sinauli has revealed four legged, lid covered coffins containing the bodies (Fig. No. 03). The lids of the coffins are profusely carved and covered with thin plate of copper (patra). Once such coffin is visible in the above figure on the upper left side. The coffin is laid roughly along west-east axis. 

Fig. No. 04: Chariot (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

Towards the feet of the body, two chariots were also buried. Its wheels are solid and studded with triangular pieces of copper (Fig: 04). The light frame of the carriage has a curved chassis made of rounded wood.

Fig. No. 05: Closure view of chariot (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

In addition to the chassis being fixed to the covering of axel, there was a similar ‘U’ shaped wooden support for the carriage as shown in the figure above. A long shaft was fixed to the chassis. Joint has been covered with thin copper plate which is visible from the side in the figure (Fig. No. 04 & 05). The long shaft must have been attached to a transverse yoke. The upper end of the front side of the carriage helped the driver in remaining stable while the chariot was being driven. It appears that this chariot carried two persons. 

Fig. No. 06: Another view of Chariot found in the burial at Sinauli, Distt. Baghpat U.P. 

Fig. No. 07: Closure view of the lid of coffin (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

Fig. No. 08: Overview of the grave with double chariot burial (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

Fig. No. 09: Closure view of the Wheel of the Chariot (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 

Fig. No. 10: In situ Carriage pole in another grave (Courtesy: Archaeological Survey of India) 


Fig. No. 11: Muga Pakkha Jataka carved on a panel at Bharhut district Satna M.P.

Chariots in Sunga Sculptures : In a panel from Bharhut depicting Muga Pakkha Jataka dated 2nd century B.C., one can see a chariot driven by four horses on the lower left side and a grave digger on the lower right side (Fig. No. 11). According to this Jataka story, Buddha was once born in the house of a King (on the upper right side of the panel) after much persuasion by Indra. He was named Temiya. When he grew up, he was not interested in becoming a king so the king ordered him to be killed and buried. The charioteer Sunanda took him to the cemetery and started digging the grave (on the lower left side of the panel). On this Temiya explained to him that, he didn’t want to become a king therefore he didn’t take interest in the affairs of the kingdom. On hearing this, the charioteer became his disciple. He took Temiya to the king and queen. They also became his disciples and later on, he started preaching to the people and had many disciples (on the upper left side of the panel). The details of construction are visible on the chariot shown in the following panel. One similar chariot with spoked wheel can be seen in a panel from Sanchi (Fig. No. 12). It is dated to 1st-2nd century B.C.

Fig. No. 12: Chariot shown in a panel at Sanchi district Raisen M.P. 



The Pottery found in Burials : The pottery recovered from Sinauli belongs to OCP culture. No Harappan pottery or any other pottery except OCP was found from the graveyard of Sinauli. The grave in question belongs to the OCP people who were late contemporaries of Harappans. The chariot is light and was made for carrying two persons. The pottery which was recovered from this place is similar to the OCP potteries which were found from Barabanki, Faizabad, Sultanpur axis in the east to Bara, Kalibangan axis in the west. The similarity between the potteries from east to west has been discussed in details by the author in the article ‘Archaeological Gazetteer of Aligarh & Hathras Districts with special reference to OCP & Other Proto-Historic Cultures of Indo-Gangetic Plains’.

Fig. No. 13-A: OCP potteries 

The repertoire of common shapes from Faizabad to Bara is given in the following figure (Fig. No. 13-A). The typical Harappan pottery shapes like vessels with bulging bodies and stem bases, cylindrical jars, jars with S-profile, all with beaded & beaked lips, dish on stands with ledged rims, basins & Indus Goblet, tumblers and cups are not to be found among purely OCP sites which are found independently from mature Harappan sites even in western U.P.

Fig. 13-B: Mature Harappan Potteries 

Although at some sites, we find the predominantly OCP shapes mixed with mature Harappan pottery shapes. The area beyond the Ganga-Yamuna doab doesn’t yield these (mature Harappan) shapes at all4 (Fig. no. 13-B).

The paintings, the incised designs, applique designs and rustication on the potteries surprisingly remain the same from east to west and from Shivalikas to Yamuna. In the east, OCP culture rubs shoulders with corded-ware tradition and in the west, it rubs shoulders with Harappans. It appears that in the hay days of Harappans, the OCP area was encroached upon by Harappan people that-is-why in Punjab, Haryana & Ganga-Yamuna doab, one finds Harappan antiquities mixed with OCP antiquities. The date for OCP sites come mostly from Punjab, Haryana, North Rajasthan and western U.P. They fall between 4th millennium B.C. to the early 2nd millennium B.C. Seeing the antiquity of sites in eastern U.P. which have yielded the dates for Neolithic going back to 9th millennium B.C. and looking at the antiquities found there, it is obvious that the pottery tradition in the eastern India is totally different from Harappans and OCP areas. One doesn’t see the encroachment of the corded-ware tradition of east coming to the west. Similarly the pre Harappan potteries like those from Qili-gul-mohammed/Mehrgarh, Haqra and Kotdiji are not to be found in western areas of the OCP zone. Only the mature Harappans encroach upon the western part of this culture. From this, it is very obvious that OCP had a local beginning and will go back to 9th-10th millennium B.C., had it not been so this whole area would have yielded the Neolithic/ early Chalcolithic potteries from east (corded-ware tradition) or from west (Qili-gul-mohammed/Mehrgarh) mentioned above. 

Fig. No. 14: Map showing the area of OCP from Faizabad to Bara.

Copper Hoard Weapons associated with OCP : The highest number of copper hoard weapons were found from OCP area (Fig. No. 14), therefore, it is very obvious that these north Indians were manufacturers and users of these weapons.


Fig. No. 15: Mesolithic hunter wielding harpoon shown in rock painting of Matiyahi, Chitrakoot U.P. 

The antennae sword found in these burials (Sinauli) and other copper artefacts found from OCP sites in an archaeological context like Saipai, district Etawah U.P. and without archaeological context have proved that these weapons belonged to OCP people. The inspiration for these Harpoons came from Mesolithic harpoons shown in one of the rock paintings of Chitrakoot9 (Fig. No. 15).


Fig. No. 16: Harpoon from Ahichhatra


Fig. No. 17: Harpoon from Bijnor kept at Lucknow museum 

These harpoons were later on replicated by the people belonging to Chalcolithic phase of OCP like the harpoons shown in figure10, 11 (Fig. No. 16 & 17).


Fig. No. 18: Rock painting from Kabri Patthar district Chitrakoot U.P.


Fig. No. 19: Rock painting from Geruhai district Chitrakoot U.P.

Fig. No. 20: Rock painting from Geruhai Pahad district Chitrakoot U.P. 

Some of the rock paintings of Chitrakoot area show people wielding harpoons and copper Celts used by people belonging to OCP culture. The figure nos. 18-20 show some foot soldiers and horse riders wielding harpoons. This clearly indicates that these horse riders and foot soldiers can be associated with the people of OCP culture. The horse riders wielding harpoons indicate that OCP people were using horse for their war machineries.

Fig. No. 21: Battle axe from Bedhak Chauri district Chitrakoot U.P.



Fig. No. 24: Shouldered axe from Hastinapur district Meerut U.P. 

This must have happened during the last phase of OCP because the horses were used in war machinery only after 2000 B.C. in Middle East. In some of the rock paintings, the copper hoard axes have also been drawn (Fig. No. 21-24).

The Source of Horses for OCP culture: The people have wrongly assumed that the horse in India came from Central Asia. The western part of South Asia might have received the horses from Central Asia. In fact pre-historic sites of Afghanistan give the evidences of horse in Neolithic period. North India is far away from Afghanistan and Central Asia. The source which is very near North India is Tibet. Tibet has indigenous breeds of Pony. Riwoche pony is the ancient breed of horse belonging to Tibet. The shortest path from Tibet to India was crossing the Himalayas through the gorges of Trans-Himalayan Rivers and different passes. This route is roughly 150 kilometers long. The Himalayan tribe were a link between the Tibet and Gangetic plains. There was a long standing trade between the two areas. The discovery of ingots shaped like anthropomorphic figures at Bankot Uttrakhand India12 and district Mustang Nepal13 proves that there was a regular trade between northern India and Himalayan/ Trans-Himalayan region for copper, copper artefacts and other goods. The Bhotiyas of Kumaon-Garhwal carried on trade between Tibet and Himalayan areas/ plains before 1947. The modern day Tamatas of Kumaon and Tamrakars of Nepal are copper smiths of Himalayan region and are ethnic survivors of ancient copper smiths. Coming to literature, it is evident that the chariot makers were known as Sutas during Mahabharata time. Their profession was very important because we see Karna, the son of Adhiratha (who was the charioteer of Dhritarashtra of Hastinapur) rose to become the minor king under Duryodhana. Later on, the Sutas took up the job of narrating Itihas, Puranas and Narasansas to the people. This is very obvious from the fact that Sutaji is the narrator of Mahabharata and Puranas.


Conclusion: 

The chariots found at Sinauli belong to OCP culture. It belongs to late phase of OCP (around 2000 B.C.). The OCP people were using the copper hoard battle axes, harpoons and antennae swords. It appears that they were importing copper and finished copper objects from all over India. Some of the rock paintings of Chitrakoot reveal that Vindhyan area, south of river Yamuna was invaded by copper hoard people. At that time, OCP people were using horses also for their war machinery. From these rock paintings, it is very clear that the OCP people were using these during the late phase of OCP. The find at Sinauli reinforces this conclusion because the chariots buried there are horse driven light chariots used in wars, sports and game. These chariots continued to be used by the local people as evident by Sanchi and Bharhut panels.









DR. ABHAY KUMAR SINGH A INDIAN BORN RUSSIAN DEPUTAT OF KURSK CITY


Here is the story of a politician in Vladimir Putin's United Russia party.

Abhay Kumar Singh is a United Russia party legislator in Kursk. Kursk in Russia is an ancient city best known for the defeat of Adolf Hitler's army in 1943. Now, it has a special India connection. Abhay Kumar Singh, who hails from Patna, Bihar, is a lawmaker in Kursk city assembly.


Abhay Kumar Singh hails from Patna in Bihar and owns several businesses in Russia. He completed his school education from Loyola High School in Patna and went to Kursk, the administrative city of the province to study medicine in early 1990s.


He had gone to Russia to study medicine in early 1990s, After graduating from the Kursk State Medical University, Abhay Singh returned to Patna to practise as a registered doctor. Things did not work out the way Abhay Singh wished. He went back to Kursk and entered the pharmaceutical business.


Soon, the Patna boy became a known business personality in Kursk overcoming all obstacles being a non-white foreigner he found in his way. After pharmaceuticals, Abhay Kumar Singh tried his hands in the real estate sector.

Ajai Malhotra, the then Indian ambassador to Russia, inaugurating a shopping mall owned by United Russia legislator Abhay Singh.

Abhay Kumar Singh first struck high political notes in 2012 when the then Indian ambassador to Russia Ajai Malhotra inaugurated the Uralskiy Trade Centre located in the heart of Kursk city. Abhay Kumar Singh owns the mall.


With success in business, Abhay Singh involved himself with local affairs and engaged with local Russians. But he has maintained his India connection. On International Yoga Day in 2015, he "organised the first International Yoga Day in Kursk"

Kursk deputat Abhay Kumar Singh casting vote in Russian election.

His Facebook updates reveal his increasing political inclinations since 2015. Soon, Abhay Singh officially became a member of United Russia party. Within no time, he is a deputat Kursk city assembly. He won the provincial election on a United Russia party ticket as a deputat -- parallel to an MLA in India. Russian President Vladimir Putin's United Russia has been in power in Russia for over 18 years. In March, it swept the polls winning more than three-fourth seats in the federal assembly.






 

LOVE STORY OF KUNWAR BRIJESH SINGH BISEN AND SVETLANA STALIN - IMMORTAL RAJPUTS


एक था ‘राजा’, एक थी स्वेतलाना


एक प्रेम कहानी जिसने भारत, रूस और अमेरिका के राजनीतिक व कूटनीतिक सम्बंधों में तनाव पैदा कर दिया था। यह है स्वेतलाना एलिल्युयेवा और राजकुमार ब्रजेश सिंह प्रेम कहानी। प्रतापगढ़ के कालाकांकर के राजकुमार ब्रजेश सिंह को सोवियत संघ के तानाशाह जोसेफ स्टालिन की बेटी से मोहब्बत हो गई थी, वह भी एक अस्पताल में इलाज के दौरान।

कालाकांकर राजभवन की काली कोठी (प्रकाश गृह) की दीवारें उदास सी हैं। अंदर अजीब सी खामोशी है। राजघराने की इसी कोठी में कभी सोवियत संघ के तानाशाह शासक जोसेफ स्टालिन की ‘छोटी तितली’ की खिलखिलाहट भी गूंजी थी। इंग्लिश, फ्रेंच, रसियन और टूटी-फूटी हिंदी में मोहब्बत की दास्तां बयां हुई। प्रेम की वो परिभाषा लिखी गई जिसे सदियों तक भुलाया नहीं जा सकेगा। कालाकांकर राजघराने के कुंवर ब्रजेश सिंह और स्टालिन की बेटी स्वेतलाना अलिलुयेवा की प्रेम कहानी यहीं हमेशा के लिए अमर हो गई। सोवियत सरकार ने दोनों को शादी की इजाजत नहीं दी, लेकिन स्वेतलाना को बृजेश सिंह से इस कदर मोहब्बत थी कि तीन साल तक साथ रहने के बाद जब उनकी मौत हुई तो वह उनकी अस्थियां हिदूं रीति-रिवाज से गंगा में विसर्जित करने के लिए कालाकांकर आ गईं।


उन दिनों ब्रजेश सिंह मास्को में रहते थे।

कालाकांकर राजघराने के कुंवर ब्रजेश सिंह उन कम्युनिस्ट नेताओं में से थे जिन्होंने 1930 के बाद सोवियत संघ के मास्को को अपना घर बनाया। वह पूर्व विदेश मंत्री स्व. राजा दिनेश सिंह के चाचा थे। 1963 में मास्को के एक अस्पताल में ब्रजेश सिंह और स्वेतलाना की मुलाकात हुई। ब्रजेश सिंह उस समय ब्रोन्किइक्टेसिस जैसी बीमारी से जूझ रहे थे, जबकि स्वेतलाना टांसिल के आपरेशन के लिए अस्पताल गई थीं। पहली नजर में ही दोनों एक-दूसरे के प्यार में गिर गए। ब्रजेश सिंह के व्यक्तित्व और उनकी सौम्यता ने स्वेतलाना को काफी प्रभावित किया। वह उनकी दीवानी हो गईं।

1963 में दोनों मास्को के एक अस्पताल में ब्रजेश सिंह ब्रोन्किइक्टेसिस बीमारी के इलाज के लिए भर्ती हुए थे, जबकि स्वेतलाना टांसिल के आपरेशन के लिए अस्पताल गई थीं। पहली ही नजर में दोनों को प्यार हो गया। बृजेश सिंह के व्यवहार और व्यक्तित्व से स्वेतलाना काफी प्रभावित थीं। वह उनके प्यार में दीवानी हो गईं। दोनों ने संग जीने-मरने की कसमें खा लीं, लेकिन सोवियत संघ की सरकार ने शादी की अनुमति नहीं दी। बावजूद दोनों ने सरहदों का बंधन तोड़कर शादी कर ली, लेकिन तकनीकी तौर पर उस शादी को मंजूरी नहीं मिली। व्यवहारिक रूप से 1964 से दोनों पति-पत्नी की तरह साथ-साथ रहते थे।

भारत में नहीं मिली रहने की इजाजत तो...
स्वेतलाना प्रतापगढ़ के कालाकांकर में काफी समय तक रहीं। यहां आज भी इनकी प्रेम कहानी की स्मृतियां मौजूद हैं। कालाकांकर के ब्रजेश अस्पताल के एक स्कूल की दीवारों पर स्वेतलाना और ब्रजेश सिंह की तस्वीरें लगी हैं, जो खुद स्वेतलाना ने बनवाया था। तत्कालीन इंदिरा सरकार ने उन्हें नागरिकता नहीं, जिस कारण वापस जाना पड़ा। भारत अपने मित्र देश से इस मामले पर कोई विवाद नहीं चाहता था। वर्ष 1966 में ब्रजेश सिंह का असामयिक निधन हो गया। इसके बाद वह उनकी अस्थि भस्म लेकर स्वेतलाना भारत आई थीं। स्वेतलाना भारत में ही बसना चाहता थी, लेकिन भारत सरकार की इजाजत न मिलने पर वह अमेरिका चली गईं और बाद में ब्रिटेन की नागरिककता ले ली। 85 साल की उम्र में स्वेतलाना का निधन हो गया।

हिंदी भी सीखी



स्वेतलाना न सिर्फ बृजेश सिंह से प्यार करती थीं, बल्कि उन्हें भारतीय वेशभूषा, परम्परा, रीति-रिवाजों और उनकी भाषा से बेहद मोहब्ब थी। कालाकांकर में उनकी अस्थियां विसर्जित करने के बाद वह कुछ दिन यहां रुकीं और हिंदी बोलना भी सीख लिया था।

मोहब्बत इस कदर जवां हुई कि दोनों को एक दूसरे के बिना जीना गंवारा नहीं था, लेकिन तत्काल सोवियत संघ की सरकार ने शादी की अनुमति नहीं दी। बावजूद इसके दोनों पति-पत्नी की तरह ही रहते थे। तीन साल से भी अधिक समय तक दोनों साथ रहे। अक्तूबर 1966 में रूस में ही ब्रजेश सिंह की बीमारी के चलते मौत हो गई। साथ रहते हुए उन्होंने स्वेतलाना को बताया था कि हिंदू धर्म में मरने के बाद व्यक्ति की अस्थियां गंगा में प्रवाहित की जाती हैं। ब्रजेश सिंह की मौत के बाद रूस में उनका शव हिंदू रीति-रिवाजों के मुताबिक जलाया गया।

इसके बाद स्वेतलाना ने तय किया कि वह उनकी अस्थियां गंगा में प्रवाहित करेंगी। दिसंबर 1966 में विशेष अनुमति लेकर स्वेतलाना ब्रजेश सिंह की अस्थियों के साथ भारत आईं। वह सीधे कालाकांकर राजभवन पहुंचीं। राजपरिवार ने उन्हें पूरा सम्मान दिया। राजभवन के लोगों के साथ राजभवन के किनारे गंगा में उन्होंने ब्रजेश सिंह की अस्थियों की विसर्जित किया।

दो महीने से ज्यादा रहीं कालाकांकर में


कालाकांकर राजघराने के कुंवर ब्रजेश सिंह से स्वेतलाना को इस कदर लगाव था कि वह कालाकांकर आने के बाद यहां से जाना नहीं चाहती थीं। उनकी इच्छा यहीं रहने की थी, लेकिन सरकार ने इसकी इजाजत नहीं दी। करीब दो महीने से ज्यादा समय तक वह कालाकांकर में रहीं। पंडित मदन मोहन मालवीय कॉलेज कालाकांकर के रिटायर्ड क्लर्क 70 वर्षीय एमएल गुप्ता बताते हैं कि स्वेतलाना राजभवन के प्रकाश गृह में रहती थीं। उनके कालाकांकर प्रवास के दौरान इंदिरा गांधी भी एक बार यहां आई थीं। स्वेतलाना स्कर्ट और ब्लाउज पहनती थीं। छोटे गोल्डेन कलर के बाल थे।


डॉ. कृष्ण कुमार लाल ने सिखाई हिंदी
स्वेतलाना को सिर्फ ब्रजेश सिंह से लगाव नहीं था, बल्कि उनकी वेशभूषा, परंपरा, रीति-रिवाज और उनकी भाषा से भी मोहब्बत थी। कालाकांकर में उनकी अस्थियां विसर्जित करने के बाद जब वह यहां रुकीं तो उन्हें हिंदी सीखने की भी ठान ली। एमएल गुप्ता बताते हैं कि मदन मोहन कॉलेज के संस्कृत विभाग के अध्यक्ष डॉ. कृष्ण कुमार लाल ने स्वेतलाना को हिंदी सीखने में मदद की। वह प्रतिदिन शाम को पांच बजे राजभवन जाकर स्वेतलाना को हिंदी सिखाते थे। हर दिन करीब एक घंटे तक क्लास चलती थी। स्वेतलाना नियमित रूप से गंगा घाट और पोस्टआफिस जाती थीं।


ब्रजेश सिंह के नाम से बनवाया अस्पताल

स्वेतलाना भारत में अपने प्रेम की अमिट छाप छोड़ गईं। प्रियतम ब्रजेश सिंह की याद में उन्होंने कालाकांकर में अस्पताल शुरू कराया। भारत से अमेरिका जाने के बाद स्वेतलाना ने अस्पताल के निर्माण के लिए फंड भेजा। उन्होंने अपनी किताब ‘ट्वंटी लेटर्स टू ए फ्रेंड’ से मिलने वाली रायल्टी भी अस्पताल के निर्माण के लिए भेजी। स्वेतलाना की मदद से ब्रजेश की याद में 35 बेड के अस्पताल का निर्माण कराया गया। मई 1969 में हिंदी के महान कवि सुमित्रा नंदन पंत ने इस अस्पताल का शिलान्यास किया। हालांकि अब इस अस्पताल की जगह पर स्कूल संचालित हो रहा है।

तत्कालीन पीएम ने चेताया, पति के साथ चिता जल जाती हैं भारतीय महिलाएं

सोवियत संघ में ब्रजेश की मौत के बाद स्वेतलाना ने तय कर लिया कि वह उनकी अस्थियां गंगा में ही प्रवाहित करेंगी। इसके लिए उन्होंने भारत आने का प्रयास शुरू किया। तब सोवियत संघ के नेताओं ने स्वेतलाना को ऐसा न करने के लिए मनाने की काफी कोशिश की थी। कहा जाता है कि उस समय के सोवियत प्रधानमंत्री अलेक्सी कोसिगिन ने उनसे कहा था कि वह जोखिम ले रही हैं, क्योंकि कट्टर हिंदुओं में विधवाओं को मृत पति के साथ जलाने की परंपरा है, लेकिन जिद पर अड़ीं स्वेतलाना भारत पहुंच गईं।

भारत से अमेरिका जाकर ली शरण


स्वेतलाना को सरकार ने देश में रहने के लिए मंजूरी नहीं दी थी। इस पर वह कालाकांकर से दिल्ली पहुंचीं। वह सोवियत दूतावास में ठहरी हुई थीं। यहां से उन्होंने अमेरिका में शरण लेने की ठानी। इसके लिए वह अमेरिका दूतावास में जाकर राजदूत चेस्टर बॉवल्स से मिलीं। अमेरिका उस समय सोवियत संघ से भागे हर व्यक्ति को शरण देता था। राजदूत ने एक अधिकारी के साथ स्वेतलाना को रोम की एक फ्लाइट में सवार होने के लिए एयरपोर्ट भेज दिया। फिर वहां से वह अमेरिका पहुंच गईं।

मां के आत्महत्या करने के बाद स्टालिन से करने लगीं नफरत
स्वेतलाना का स्कूली जीवन स्टालिन के विशाल व्यक्तित्व के साथ गुजरा। जब उनकी मौत हुई तब वह लारा पीटर्स थीं। इससे पहले उनका नाम स्वेतलाना अलिलुयेवा था और उससे भी पहले वह स्वेतलाना लोसिफोवना स्टालिन के नाम से जानी जाती थीं। वह सोवियत संघ पर 1922 से 1953 तक शासन करने वाले जोसेफ स्टालिन की इकलौती बेटी थीं। स्टालिन के दो बेटे थे, लेकिन वह उनकी खास थीं। स्टालिन उन्हें नन्हीं बुलबुल या छोटी तितली कहकर बुलाते थे। स्वेतलाना साढ़े छह साल की थीं जब उनकी मां ने आत्महत्या की थी। 16 साल की उम्र में जब उन्हें अपनी मां की मौत के कारणों का पता चला तब उनके मन में पिता के खिलाफ गहरी नफरत पैदा हो गई। मास्को यूनिवर्सिटी में इतिहास की पढ़ाई करने के दौरान वह ग्रिगोरी मोरोजोफ से मिलीं। जिससे उन्होंने शादी कर ली। 19 साल की उम्र में उन्होंने एक बच्चे को जन्म दिया। जिसका नाम उन्होंने जोसेफ रखा। 1947 में स्वेतलाना और गिग्रोरी का तलाक हो गया। इसके बाद वह फिर अपने पिता के पास लौट गईं। भारत से अमेरिका जाने के बाद 1970 में उन्होंने प्रतिष्ठित अमेरिकी वास्तुकार वेस्ले पीटर्स से शादी कर ली। 1971 में बेटी ओल्गा को जन्म दिया। 1978 में उन्हें अमेरिका की नागरिकता मिली। इस समय तक उनका पीटर्स से तलाक हो चुका था। वो बेटी ओल्गा के साथ न्यू जर्सी चली गईं। 22 नवंबर 2011 को 85 साल की उम्र में उनका निधन हो गया। बेटी ओल्गा ने उनका अंतिम संस्कार किया।



The most sensational of all such relations in past was that of a wealthy prince hailing from the royal family of Kalakankar State near Allahabad; and an Indian Communist. His affair with Josef Stalin’s daughter Svetlana became sensational.


Kunwar Brajesh Singh Bisen

(Hindi: ब्रजेश सिंह, or Kunwar Brijesh Singh; died 31 October 1966) was an Indian politician belonging to the Communist Party of India. He hailed from the royal family of Kalakankar near Allahabad and his nephew Dinesh Singh was a minister in the Indian cabinet.

Kunwar Brajesh Singh

Predecessor Raja Ramesh Singh

Died 1966

Burial
Kalakankar

Spouse Kunwarani Laxmi Devi
Leela (an Austrian woman)
Svetlana Alliluyeva

Issue Asha Pal
Usha Pande
Victor Singh
House Bisen, Rajput

Father Raja Ramesh Singh

Religion Hinduism

He first married Kunwarani Laxmi Devi, followed by Leela, an Austrian woman, with whom he had a son, Victor Singh, who became a photographer in England. In 1963, while recuperating from bronchitis, he met Svetlana Alliluyeva, daughter of Joseph Stalin. They lived together in Sochi, in the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic part of the Soviet Union, where he was convalescing, although they were not officially married. He died 31 October 1966 and Svetlana brought his ashes to Kalakankar to be immersed in the Ganges. She later defected to the United States in 1967, where she died in 2011.


Stalin Daughter Relationship with Kalankar Prince kunwar Brajesh Singh Bisen.


Svetlana Iosifovna Alliluyeva (later known as Lana Peters), was the youngest child and the only daughter of Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin and Nadezhda Alliluyeva, Stalin’s second wife.

Svetlana, when she was 17, married (in 1943) Grigory Morozov, a fellow student from Moscow University, though Stalin hadn’t likeed it. They had a son Josef (Iosif) in 1945. And, their divorce took place in 1947. Svetlana married, for the second time (in 1949), Yuri Zhdanov, the son of Stalin’s close associate. A daughter, Katherine, was born to them in 1950. And, soon thereafter they were divorced. Josef Stalin died in 1953.

In 1963, while in hospital for a tonsillectomy, Alliluyeva met Kunwar Brajesh Singh, an Indian Communist from the Kalakankar Rajput Zamindar family visiting Moscow. The two began to talk about a book by Rabindranath Tagore that Svetlana had found in the hospital’s library. Singh was the most peaceful man Svetlana had ever met. He protested when the hospital wanted to kill the leeches they had used in his treatment, and he opened windows to let flies escape. When she told him who her father was, he exclaimed “Oh!” and never mentioned it again. 

The two fell in love. Singh was mild-mannered and well-educated but gravely ill with bronchiectasis and emphysema. The romance grew deeper and stronger still while the couple were recuperating in Sochi near the Black Sea. They spent a month together in Sochi, by the Black Sea, before Singh had to return to India. 

A year and a half later, after delays from the Soviet and the Indian bureaucracies, Singh returned to Moscow in 1965 to work as a translator, When they met in 1963, Svetlana was about 37 years; and Brajesh Singh (said to be old enough to be her father) was about sixty, about twenty-three years elder to Svetlana. He and Svetlana filed papers to get married, but the next day she was summoned to her father’s old office in the Kremlin to meet with Alexei Kosygin, the Soviet Premier. The marriage was immoral and impossible, Svetlana recalled him saying: “Hindus treat women badly.”

It is not clear whether they were married formally. It appears that the Soviet Primer Alexi Kosygin had strongly disapproved of Svetlana getting married to Brajesh Singh. (She however persisted in calling herself as Brajesh Singh’s wife.)  In an interview on 26 April 1967, she referred to Singh as her husband but also stated that they were never allowed to marry officially. They lived together for four years as man and wife at Sochi until Brajesh Singh died on 31 October 1966.


Brajesh Singh had long suffered from respiratory problems. When he died, in 1966, Svetlana insisted that she be allowed to take his ashes back to India. It was her first trip outside the Soviet Union and, she said later, the one moment in her life when she felt blissful. Svetlana ensured that Brajesh Singh was cremated according to Hindu rites. Thereafter; she decided to take his ashes to India for immersion in the Ganges. That took time because the Soviet leaders tried hard to dissuade her from making that journey. Finally, the arrangements for her travel to India were made at the highest level. And, that was not difficult since Brajesh Singh’s nephew Dinesh Singh was a confidant of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and was also a member of her council of ministers.

Svetlana arrived in India on 20 December 1966 with ashes of Brajesh Sigh. She stayed with Brajesh’s family at their ancestral royal home at Kalakankar near Allahabad (UP). After a couple of days, on 25 December 1966, Brajesh’s ashes were immersed in the Holy Ganges, with Svetlana watching the ritual, from the shore, dressed in widow’s white sari.


Brajesh Singh’s family’s large white house, surrounded by cacti the height of trees; a sparse bedroom with large windows, flowing drapes, and a wooden bed; a man on a camel on the banks of the Ganges. “India had really tremendous impact on me—on my thinking, on my everything,” she told me.

She lived happily with Brajesh’s extended family; and got on very well with all its members. She wanted to stay back in India; and, Brajesh’s family was also willing and happy to let her stay with them. Svetlana asked Dinesh Singh (Brajesh’s nephew) to use his influence with Indira Gandhi to let her stay in India. But the Soviet Government insisted that she should be back in Moscow before the end of March 1967. Indira Gandhi , not daring to antagonize the Soviets, advised Svetlana, through Dinesh, to return to Russia. Exasperated, Svetlana approached socialist Rammanohar Lohia in Allahabad for help so that she could stay in India and build a memorial for Brajesh. He promised to help; but could do very little.

Svetlana then reached New Delhi for making arrangements for her travel to Moscow; and stayed there at the Soviet Embassy where Ambassador Nikolai Benediktov was advising her to return home . Next day , on the evening of 6 March 1967, Svetlana went out to finalise her travel arrangements ; but, she asked the taxi to drive straight to the American embassy. The embassy had shut for the day. She told the duty officer who she was and what she wanted. In panic, the duty officer rang up Ambassador Chester Bowles and told him that he must come to his office immediately to deal with a matter that could not be discussed on the phone. Mr Bowles arrived, talked to Svetlana and gave her a lined pad to write down why she wanted to go the US; and, not to her own country.

[Ambassador Chester Bowls, later recalled: In about two hours she put together a very eloquent sixteen to eighteen page statement in excellent English; a dramatic story of her life , who her father was, who her mother was, and why she wanted to leave Russia and come to America. Please see; India & the United States: Politics of the Sixties by Kalyani Shankar. P.387 to 393]

While Svetlana was writing her piece, Ambassador Bowles sent an “Eyes Only” telegram to the Secretary of State Dean Rusk explaining the situation and asking for instructions. He took care to conclude his cable with the words: “If I do not hear from the State Department by midnight (Indian time), I would, on my responsibility, give her the visa.”

According to the Ambassador’s subsequent account of the incident, as he had expected, there was not a word from Washington by the deadline. So he arranged to send Svetlana to the airport in the company of a CIA officer to catch a flight to Rome.

Only after she had reached Rome safely did the sensational news of her dramatic. great escape was leaked to the Press.

There was, of course, a huge uproar in Moscow and in New Delhi ; the US government blandly explained that it merely helped Svetlana on humanitarian grounds.

After a brief stay in Switzerland, she flew to the US. Upon her arrival in New York City in 1967, the then 41-year-old said, “I have come here to seek the self- expression that has been denied to me for so long in Russia.”

Political asylum and later life

Alliluyeva in 1967

Three days after she landed in America, Svetlana sent her children in Moscow (Iosif and Yekaterina, twenty-one and sixteen) a long letter. Soviet Communism , she said, had failed as an economic system and as a moral idea. She couldn’t live under it. “With our one hand we try to catch the moon itself, but with another one we are obliged to dig out potatoes the same way it was done a hundred years ago,” she wrote. She urged Iosif to study medicine and Yekaterina to continue to pursue science. “Please, keep peace in your hearts. I am only doing what my conscience orders me to do.”

The note that Svetlana wrote while in the US Embassy at New Delhi along with her “Twenty Letters to a Friend” was published within months of her arrival in the US; and it became a best-seller. The book in the form of a series of letters to her friend, the physicist Fyodor Volkenstein, described her family’s tragic history . The message of the book, it seemed, was that being one of Stalin’s relatives was nearly as terrible as being one of his subjects.

According to Brajesh Singh’s family in India, Svetlana did not forget her commitment for the memorial for Brajesh: “She kept sending money for many years for a hospital in Kalakankar village in Brajesh’s name, until it was taken over by the government”.


Svetlana settled down in Princeton New Jersey, where she lectured and wrote. From 1970–73, she was married to American architect William Wesley Peters with whom she had a daughter, Olga. Svetlana died in Richland Center, Wisconsin, U.S, from complications arising from colon cancer, on 22 November 2011, at the age of eighty-five (28 February 1926 to22 November 2011).














THE HISTORY OF DOGRAS DUGGAR DESH - IMMORTAL RAJPUTS


मुक्कन लग्गे माडे दिन, 
वेला बड्डले रा आया,
सुत्ती पेदी रागनी जाग्गी,
नवीं रूत्ते ने कुंडा खड़काया,
जेदी ही आस मते चिरे दी,
ओ करिए दस्ना,
वैरी तड़पने ऊण ते असें अस्ना,



The history of Durgara (Duggardesh) can be traced back to the times when it was divided into the numerous territories and each territory had it's own ruler usually known as Thakur or Rana.

The title “Deva” is found after each Rajas name in inscriptions and copper plate deeds. This too was a royal designation, as we learn from Sanskrit literature, and was affixed to the names of Kings and Queens in the masculine or feminine form, as Rex and Regina are in the British Royal family. Hence arose the Rajput salutation Jaideya or Jaideva, which originally was accorded only to Rajputs or Royal rank. 

The original form in Sanskrit was Jayatu – Devah – “May the King be victorious”.

The history of the hill states is one of almost continuous warfare. When a strong ruler rose to power, the larger State made tributary their smaller neighbours, but these again asserted their Independence, as soon as a favourable opportunity offered. These wars as a rule did not lead to any great political changes, for on the whole the hill chiefs were considerate of each others rights. Being all of the same race and faith, and also nearly related to one another by marriage and even closer family ties, they were content to make each other tributary or to replace a deposed chief by his own kinsmen.


That the hill States were able to maintain their political status for such a long period was in great measure due to their isolated position and the inaccessible character of the country. It is improbable, however, that they were completely sovereign for any great length of time. In the absence of epigraphically and literary evidence, we may assume that the Western Himalaya formed part, nominally at least, of the great Empires of the Mauryas, Kushanas and Guptas. Each followed one another in succession in Northern India. Kashmir too, as we know, held a lose sovereignty over the hill States between the Sutlej and the Indus and there is a saying:

“Baee Raj Pahad de, Bich Jammu Sardar;

Rakhin laj Pahad di, too para garibnawaz”.

There are twenty two hill chiefs of whom Jammu is the Sardar O God! Please up hold the honour of the hills in your mercy!

If a person of any territory crosses the boundary of other without permission, he was being punished. Each territory was independent of it's own with it's own ruler and had their rules and laws all subjected to their clan god.

These territories were actually the fortified settlements known as 'Durg' and due to this the area was known as 'Durgara' means 'the land of fortified settlements'. The ruler of these settlements was also known as 'Durgeshwara' means 'the lord of fortified settlements'.


When these settlements assimilated or accepted the suzeranity of powerful monarch who assured them to preserve the land from the foreign interference by keeping their common interests; following the chronology of Kot such as Jalsarkot, Jaralkot, Rotkot etc.;

Garh such as Ramgarh, Sooratgarh, Basantgarh etc. and Mandala such as Purmandal, Mandali etc.; they formed their own Janpadas.

In the earliest times, Durgara country (Duggardesh) had numerous smaller Janpadas. Each Janpada had it's own capital usually known as "Thada". In many Janpadas, the real ruler was some diety and a king appointed acted as caretaker of his throne.


Such type of Janpadas were merely found along the Asikni or Chandrabhaga(Chenab). One of such Janapada was Suraaj whose real ruler of Lord Shiva. When the invasion of neighboring kingdoms to Durgara started;

most of smaller Janpadas of Durgara united to form the greater Janpadas and protected them from alien intervention.

The important Janpadas of Durgara which had some significance in history were like Gabdika, Udumbara, Trigarth, Takka, Madra and Darva-Abhisara.


°Gabdika°

Gana-patha of Panini refers to Janapada Gabdika (IV.3.93), under Sindhvadi. Earlier, Brahmpur and then Chamba was made it's capital. Some area of Paddar and Bhadarwah was also it's part. It is one of the oldest Janapada of hilly regions.

°Udumbara/Audumbara°

Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, Hamirpur, Una and some western part of Ravi was it's part.

°Trigarth°

It is mentioned by Panini as ayudhajivi sangha, and a confederation of six states known as Trigarta-Shashtha. The name Trigarta denotes the region drained by three Rivers: Ravi, Beas & Satluj, and corresponds to the Jalandhar group of states which had retained their


geographical identity all these years. It contains Patanaprastha (Paithan or Pathankot) situated at the entrance of Kangra Valley.

°Takka°

It was situated to the upper areas of the rivers of Punjab. Most of hilly areas of Durggar was included in it. The name of Takri script of Duggar is said to have it's root in Takka.

°Madra°

It was one of the most powerful and prosperous of the times. Sakala(Sialkot) was it's capital. In ancient times, a lager part of Duggar was it's part.


°Darva-Abhisara°

As like Madra, from Chandrabhaga (Chenab) and Vitasta(Jhelum) a Janapada was there by the name "Darva-Abhisara". In reality, it was confederation of two Janapadas 'Darva and Abhisara'.

Darva was flourished between the intermediate land of Ravi and Chandrabhaga (Chenab) whereas Abhisara was extended from Chandrabhaga to Vitasta. The present Jammu area was it's part.


According to Mahabharata, Arjuna defeated the Darvas and then it was splitted into smaller Kingdoms.

From Rajatarangini, we get to know about some name of these Kingdoms like Babbapura(Babor), Vallapura(Billawar), Kasht vat(Kishtwar), Baratul(Dharmot and adjoining areas), Vishlata(Banihal to Ramaban) and Jasat(Jasrota) etc. whereas

Abhisara was splitted into four kingdoms by 10th century viz. Loharkot/Purantas, Rajapuri(Rajauri), Kalinjer(Kotli) and Nilpura(nearby areas of Mirpur).


The Durgara(Duggar) was the larger country which had the great historical significance but it's being neglected or being tried to hide. There is a great need to bring it into the limelight in order to raise the flame of self-existence within the present generation of Dogras.

THE DOGRAS


There is some little doubt about the derivation of the word "Dogra." Some say it is derived from the Indian word "dogur" or "dugir," meaning "2 hill" or "between two mountain Range," and that the Dogra country is so called because the whole of it is more or less mountainous. Others maintain that the origin of the name is found in two Sanscrit words, "do," meaning "two," and "girath," meaning "lake," there being two small lakes of great beauty known as Man Sur and Sardin Sur.



The first derivation is most probably the correct one, for it is a matter of history that the pioneer Rajputs, who left the plains to make their home in the hills to found the Dogra principalities, styled themselves Dogras, or Hillmen, as distinguished from men of the plains.

The district of Dogra lies between the rivers Chenab and Sutlej, including all the hills and valleys on the slopes of the Western Himalayas.


Rissaldar Major Sunayat Singh of Kashmir Lancers ,1897. He was commandant of the Kashmir Lancers,a unit of J n K State Forces. Painted by Rudolf Swoboda 
(He was relative of Maharaja Pratap Singh of Jammu and Kashmir)


The Dogra is a shy, reserved man, with considerable strength of character. He may not be so brilliant as the Rajput found in Rajputana, nor so tenacious and subtle as the Gurkha (Khas Rajput), but he has a high idea of honour, is very self-respecting, and makes a capital soldier. Since he is always ready to cast aside his social prejudices he affords recruiting officers little trouble. The virtues of this solid, quiet, resolute, reliable man are seen in moments of peril, when, without any boasting or striking of attitudes, he will face certain death with a calm determination to do before he dies.

From the above description it will be gathered that the Dogra is simple-minded and generous, capable of the highest loyalty, and a complete stranger to anything like treachery or cruel barbarity. It is through the combination of all these qualities that the Dogras as a race have justly earned, and faithfully maintained, the reputation of being among the best fighting material to be found in India.

The Dogra's physique like every pahari is not so heavily built as that of the Martial races we see in plains. They are man of average height, somewhat sparely built, with fine, sensitive features. Thier complexion are fair, though not as fair as that of the Todas.

A Picket, 20th (Punjab) Regiment of [Bengal] Native Infantry, North-West Frontier, 1868 (c)
{Oil on canvas by Brevet Major (later Major General) Walter Fane (1828-1885), 11th (Madras) Native Infantry, 1868 (c).} The two principal sitters were sketched from life and named by the artist, Major Walter Fane, on the back of the canvas. The officer to the left is Subadar-Major Jaie Singh, (a Dogra Rajput) who enlisted on 27 March 1849. He was awarded the Order of British India and was pensioned on 30 April 1878. In the centre is Havildar Mir Alum (an Afridi), who rose to the rank of Jemadar and served in the 2nd Afghan War (1878-1880). In the background are two Pathan sepoys.

The Dogras are very particular in all matters relating to food and drink. They are keen sportsmen, and in rifle-shooting they maintain a fair standard of excellence. Hawking and snaring birds are favourite pastimes among them, and even such games as tip-cat, leap-frog, and hop-scotch are not unknown to them.


"The Siege of Lahore one such example of great marksmanship, it is also the story of 3000 men successfully holding out against a armed force of 60000-1,50,000 men."

Screenshot from A history of the reigning family of Lahore


This is one the many legendary feats performed by the Dogras in this great siege against impossible odds where During the siege of Lahore unable to withstand Dogra fire Sultan Mahomed a artillery Captain under sikhs took hostage 1000-1200 women of the Sikh capital to save his troops from the Dogras.


The Dogras were however were forced to shoot at the enemy for the sake of survival. With great skill, accuracy & care Dogra marksmen killed 186 enemy artillerymen while the collateral damage being only 19 women out of the 1000-1200 taken hostage killed!!


Alexander Gardner with his trained Dogra artillerymen. (1864)


This brave and loyal race were faithful to us during the Mutiny, and their services at the siege of Delhi were invaluable; but as early as 1849 their soldierly qualities had been recognised, for it was at that time that the Government enlisted great numbers of them in the Punjab Frontier Force. The reason of this lay chiefly in their military value, although it was at the same time evident that they would be useful to balance the influence of the martial, who were still imbued with their traditions.

The 2nd Sikh Infantry, raised at Kangra in 1846, consisted entirely of Dogras. This was the regiment that ratified its loyalty by assisting to quell a rebellion of its own countrymen. Later, in the second Afghan war, this same regiment, the majority still being Dogras, fought gallantly at the battle of Ahmad Khel. Indeed, there was a moment in this battle when victory or defeat depended entirely on this regiment. At this critical juncture it behaved splendidly, and disaster was averted.


ज्वाला माता की जय is the war cry of the soldiers of  DOGRA REGIMENT 

This is one of the gates the 4th battalion of the DOGRA REGIMENT has constructed as a mark of their devotion to the great Goddess Jwalamukhi at Jawalaji (Kangra). 



Dogras from Himachal,Jammu and some parts of Punjab are recruited in Dogra Regimental Centre: Faizabad, UP

Motto: Kartavyam Anvatma (Duty Before Death)

War Cry: Jwala Mata Ki Jai (Victory to Goddess Jwala)

Mascot:Tiger



THE DOGRA REGIMENTS, WITH THEIR BATTLE HONOURS

Company Regiments—Cavalry

It must be borne in mind that Company Regiments are those which contain squadrons or companies of different native classes. The following regiments of Indian Cavalry contain Dogras in the proportions given:

7th Hariana Lancers, one squadron.
9th Hodson's Horse, half a squadron.
10th Duke of Cambridge's Own Lancers (Hodson's Horse), one squadron.
11th King Edward's Own Lancers (Probyn's Horse), one squadron.
12th Cavalry, one squadron.
13th Duke of Connaught's Lancers (Watson's Horse), one squadron.
16th Cavalry, one squadron.
19th Lancers (Fane's Horse), half a squadron.
21st Prince Albert Victor's Own Cavalry (Frontier Force) (Daly's Horse), half a squadron.
23rd Cavalry (Frontier Force), half a squadron.
25th Cavalry (Frontier Force), one squadron.

Class Regiments—Infantry


A beautiful image of the Colours on Parade! 37th Dogras in 1890's.

37th Dogras. Raised 1858, disbanded 1882, re-formed 1887.

Comprises 8 companies of Dogras.

Battle Honours.—"Chitral," "Punjab Frontier."

Uniform.Scarlet, facings yellow.

38th Dogras. Raised 1858.

Comprises 8 companies of Dogras.

Battle Honours.—"Punjab Frontier," "Malakand."

Uniform.Scarlet, facings yellow.


38th Dogras with captured pasthun tribalmen


The regiment went on to serve in Palestine, taking part in the battles of Megiddo and Nablus before helping capture Damascus (1918).


38th Dogras on the Great Pyramid, Egypt (1918)


The 38th Dogras arrived in Egypt in April 1918 where they joined the 10th Division which was then undergoing a major reorganisation with many British units being replaced by Indian ones. 38th Dogras ceased to exist after 1922 when they were merged into 17th Dogra Regiment. 17th Dogra Regiment dropped the '17th' prefix and became part of Indian Army after India's Independence in 1947. They fought valiantly in 1947-48 war supporting the J&K State Forces.

41st Dogras. Raised 1900.

Comprises 8 companies of Dogras.

Uniform.Scarlet, facings yellow.


Jai Duggar Jai Dogra🇪🇦