Monday, November 3, 2014

PROSTRATION OF THE BELIEVER



For those who don’t believe or do not know of the amount of destruction that took place in India at the hands of the Muslim invaders and Islamic rulers who established themselves in parts of India, we can review the Islamic chronicles of the deeds of these rulers of the day, as written by the Muslim contemporary writers or historians. So what follows is a review of some of the books and their authors who recorded the histories of the Islamic rulers, and quotes from some of the descriptions within them about the cities they attacked and the temples they destroyed. It really shows how demoniac and cruel these rulers were.

The evidence of destruction of thousands of Hindu temples can be primarily found from two different sources:
1. Literary Evidence from the work of renowned Islamic historians
2. Epigraphic Evidence from the inscriptions on numerous Mosques all over India.
This article deals with only the literary evidence.

Hundreds of Muslim historians have glorified the deeds of their Muslim heroes all over India. This by no means is an exhaustive list! To learn more about this, please read both volumes of, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them? by Sita Ram Goel.
There is elaborate literary evidence from the Islamic sources which glorify the crimes committed by the Muslims in India. Crimes such as the desecration of the Hindu idols, looting of the temples, killing devotees and raping have been well documented by the Muslim historians themselves. They have done so because according to them these Muslim rulers by doing such deeds were following the tenets of Islam and Sunnah of the prophet Mohammed. The literary evidence stated below is in chronological order with reference to the time at which a particular work was written.

1. Name Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad Mein (India under Islamic Rule)
Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai.
About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history. Because of his scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the Darul Nadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama. He continued in that post till his death in February 1923.

The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above mentioned book. Here we can see a brief description of few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples.
a. Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi: "According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al-Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the Hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud-Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque..."
b. The Mosque at Jaunpur: "This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiseled stones. Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid."
c. The Mosque at Qanauj: "It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here. The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar."
d. Jami Masjid at Etwah: "This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed. ."
e. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya: "This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji... Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H.963 "





f. Mosque at Benaras: "Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple. That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan."
g. Mosque at Mathura: "Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura. This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite."


2. Name Of The Book: Futuhu'l-Buldan
Name Of The Historian: Ahmed bin Yahya bin Jabir
About The Author: This author is also known as al-Biladhuri. He lived at the court of Khalifa Al-Mutawakkal (AD 847-861) and died in AD 893. His history is one of the major Arab chronicles.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
a. Ibn Samurah (AD 653)
Siestan (Iran)
"On reaching Dawar, he surrounded the enemy in the mountain of Zur, where there was a famous Hindu temple." "...Their idol of Zur was of gold, and its eyes were two rubies. The zealous Musalmans cut off its hands and plucked out its eyes, and then remarked to the Marzaban how powerless was his idol..."




b. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715)
Samarkand (Farghana)
"Other authorities say that Kutaibah granted peace for 700,000 dirhams and entertainment for the Moslems for three days. The terms of surrender included also the houses of the idols and the fire temples. The idols were thrown out, plundered of their ornaments and burned..."


c. Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)
Debal (Sindh)
"...The town was thus taken by assault, and the carnage endured for three days. The governor of the town, appointed by Dahir, fled and the priests of the temple were massacred. Muhammad marked a place for the Musalmans to dwell in, built a mosque, and left 4,000 Musalmans to garrison the place..."
"...Ambissa son of Ishak Az Zabbi, the governor of Sindh, in the Khilafat of Mu'tasim billah knocked down the upper part of the minaret of the temple and converted it into a prison..."


Multan (Punjab)
"...He then crossed the Biyas, and went towards Multan...Muhammad destroyed the water-course; upon which the inhabitants, oppressed with thirst, surrendered at discretion. He massacred the men capable of bearing arms, but the children were taken captive, as well as ministers of the temple, to the number of 6,000. The Musalmans found there much gold in a chamber ten cubits long by eight broad..."


d. Hasham bin 'Amru al-Taghlabi
Khandahar (Maharashtra)
"He then went to Khandahar in boats and conquered it. He destroyed the Budd (idol) there, and built in its place a mosque."




3. Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari
Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari
About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam. The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715)
Beykund (Khurasan)
"The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their country was assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children. The ornaments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each. Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah. They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion."


Samarkand (Farghana)
"A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines of Kateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate. The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility. He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple...."
"...Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images."




b.. Yaqub bin Laith (AD 870-871)
Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)
"He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad. On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul..."
"Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple -- the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers -- of its sculptural wealth..."
"The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking. The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas'udi mentions elephants. The wonder excited in Baghdad by baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya'qub also speaks for their high value."


4. Name Of The Book: Tarikhu'l-Hind
Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi.
About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997 - 1030). His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century AD)
Multan (Punjab)
"A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya. It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies. It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga .....When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it. Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow's flesh on its neck by way of mockery. On the same place a mosque was built. When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests..."


b. Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-1030)
Thanesar (Haryana)
"The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus. The idol of that place is called Cakrasvamin, i.e. the owner of the chakra, a weapon which we have already described. It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man. It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga."




Somnath (Gujrat)
"The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! --AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroidered garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin, an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet."


5. Name Of The Book: Kitabu'l-Yamini
Name Of The Historian: Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Muhammad al Jabbaru'l-Utbi.
About The Author: This author's work comprises the whole of the reign of Subuktigin and that of Sultan Mahmud down to the year AD 1020.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Amir Sbuktigin Of Ghazni
Lamghan (Afghanistan)
"The Amir marched out towards Lamghan, which is a city celebrated for its great strength and abounding wealth. He conquered it and set fire to the places in its vicinity which were inhabited by infidels, and demolishing idol temples, he established Islam in them. He marched and captured other cities and killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters and gratifying the Musulmans."


b. Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997-1030)
Narain (Rajasthan)
"The Sultan again resolved on an expedition to Hind, and marched towards Narain, urging his horses and moving over ground, hard and soft, until he came to the middle of Hind, where he reduced chiefs, who, up to that time obeyed no master, overturned their idols, put to the sword the vagabonds of that country, and with delay and circumspection proceeded to accomplish his design..."


Nardin (Punjab)
"After the Sultan had purified Hind from idolatry, and raised mosques therein, he determined to invade the capital of Hind to punish those who kept idols and would not acknowledge the unity of God...He marched with a large army in the year AH 404 (AD 1013) during a dark night..."
"A stone was found there in the temple of the great Budda on which an inscription was written purporting that the temple had been founded 50,000 years ago. The Sultan was surprised at the ignorance of these people, because those who believe in the true faith represent that only seven hundred years have elapsed since the creation of the world, and the signs of resurrection are even now approaching. The Sultan asked his wise men the meaning of this inscription and they all concurred in saying that it was false, and no faith was to be put in the evidence of a stone."


Thanesar (Haryana)
"The chief of Tanesar was...obstinate in his infidelity and denial of God. So the Sultan marched against him with his valiant warriors, for the purpose of planting the standards of Islam and extirpating idolatry.."
"The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discoloured, not withstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it...The victory gained by God's grace, who has established Islam for ever as the best religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it...Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honour he bestows upon Islam and Musulmans."








Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
"The Sultan then departed from the environs of the city, in which was a temple of the Hindus. The name of this place was Mahartul Hind... On both sides of the city there were a thousand houses, to which idol temples were attached, all strengthened from top to bottom by rivets of iron, and all made of masonry work..."
"In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and firmer than the rest, which can neither be described nor painted. The Sultan thus wrote respecting it: --'If any should wish to construct a building equal to this, he would not be able to do it without expending an 100,000,000 red dinars, and it would occupy 200 years even though the most experience and able workmen were employed'... The Sultan gave orders that all temples should be burnt with naptha and fire, and levelled with the ground."


Kanauj (Uttar Pradesh)
"In Kanauj there were nearly 10,000 temples, which the idolaters falsely and absurdly represented to have been founded by their ancestors two or three hundred thousand years ago...Many of the inhabitants of the place fled and were scattered abroad like so many wretched widows and orphans, from the fear which oppressed them, in consequence of witnessing the fate of their deaf and dumb idols. Many of them thus effected their escape, and those who did not fly were put to death."


6. Name Of The Book: Diwan-i-Salman
Name Of The Historian: Khawajah Masud bin Sa'd bin Salman
About The Author: Khawajah Masud bin Sa'd bin Salman was a poet. He wrote poems in praise of the Ghaznavid Sultans-Masu'd, Ibrahim and Bahram Shah. He died sometime between AD 1126 and 1131.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Sultan Abu'l Muzaffar Ibrahim (AD 1059-1099)
"As power and the strength of a lion was bestowed upon Ibrahim by the Almighty, he made over to him the well-populated country of Hindustan and gave him 40,000 valiant horsemen to take the country, in which there were more than 1000 rais...The army of the king destroyed at one time a thousand temples of idols, which had each been built for more than a thousand years. How can I describe the victories of the King..."




Jalandhar (Punjab)
"The narrative of any battles eclipses the stories of Rustam and Isfandiyar... By morning meal, not one soldier, not one Brahmin remained unkilled or uncaptured. Their heads were levelled with the ground with flaming fire… Thou has secured the victory to the country and to religion, for amongst the Hindus this achievement will be remembered till the day of resurrection. "


Malwa (Madhya Pradesh)
"…On this journey, the army destroyed a thousand idol-temples and thy elephants trampled over more than a hundred strongholds. Thou didst march thy army to Ujjain… The lip of infidelity became dry through fear of thee, the eye of plural-worship became blind..."


7. Name Of The Book: Chach-Namah
Name Of The Historian: Mohammed Al bin Hamid bin Abu Bakr Kufi
About The Author: The Persian history was translated from Arabic by the above mentioned author in the time of Nasiruddin Qabacha, a slave of Mohammed Ghori.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)
Siwistan and Sisam (Sindh)
Mohammed bin Qasem wrote to al-Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq:
"The forts of Siwistan and Sism have been already taken. The nephew of Dahir, his warriors and principal officers have been dispatched, and infidels converted to Islam or destroyed. Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, the call to prayers is raised so that devotions are performed at sacred hours."


Multan (Punjab)
"Mohammed Qasem arose and with his counselors, guards and attendants, went to the temple. He saw there an idol made of gold, and its two eye were bright red rubies... Muhammed Qasem ordered the idol to be taken up. Two hundred and thirty ‘mans’ of gold were brought to the treasury together with the gems and pearls and treasures which were obtained from the plunder of Multan."


8. Name Of The Book: Jamiu'l-Hikayat
Name Of The Historian: Maulana Nuruddin Muhammed `Ufi
About The Author: The author was born in or near the city of Bukhara in Transoxiana. He came to India and lived in Delhi for some time in the reign of Shamsu'd-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Amru bin Laith (AD 879-900)
Sakawand (Afghanistan)
"It is related that Amru Lais conferred the governorship of Zabulistan on Fardaghan and sent him there at the head of four thousand horses. There was a large Hindu place of worship in that country, which was called Sakawand and people used to come on pilgrimage from the most remote parts of Hindustan to the idols of that place. When Fardaghan arrived in Zabulistan he led his army against it, took the temple, broke the idols in pieces and overthrew the idolaters... "


9. Name Of The Book: Taju'l-Ma'sir
Name Of The Historian: Sadru'd-Din Muhammed Hasan Nizamii
About The Author: The author was born at Nishapur in Khurusan. He had to leave his ancestral place because of the Mongol invasion. He came to India and started writing his history in AD 1205.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:


a. Sultan Muhammed Ghuri (AD 1175-1206)
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
"He destroyed the pillars and foundations of the idol temples and built in their stead mosques and colleges, and the precepts of Islam, and the customs of the law were divulged and established. .."




Kuhram and Samana (Punjab)
"The Government of the fort of Kohram and Samana were made over by the Sultan to Kutuu-din. He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed it from the thorn of God-plurality, and the impurity of idol-worship and by his royal vigor and intrepidity, left not one temple standing..."


Meerut (Uttar Pradesh)
"Kutub-d din marched from Kohran and when he arrived at Meerut which is one of the celebrated forts of the country of Hind, for the strength of its foundations and superstructure, and its ditch, which was as broad as the ocean and fathomless- an army joined him, sent by the dependent chiefs of the country. The fort was captured, and a Kotwal was appointed to take up his station in the fort, and all the idol temples were converted into mosques."


Delhi
"He then marched and encamped under the fort of Delhi...The city and its vicinity were freed from idols and idol-worship, and in the sanctuaries of the images of the Gods, nosques were raised by the worshippers of one God. Kutub-d din built the Jami Masjid at Delhi and adorned it with stones and gold obtained from the temples which had been demolished by the elephants, and covered it with inscriptions in Toghra, containing the divine commands."


Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)
"From that place (Asni) the royal armi proceeded towards Benares which is the center of the country of Hind and here they destroyed nearly 1000 temples, and raised mosques on their foundations and the knowledge of the law became promulgated, and the foundations of religion were established. ."




Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh)
"There was a certain tribe in the neighbourhood of Kol which had occasioned much trouble. Three bastions were raised as high as heaven with their heads, and their carcasses became the food of beasts of prey. That tract was freed from idols and idol-worship and the foundation of infidelity were destroyed."


Bayana (Rajasthan)
"When Kutub-d din heard of Sultan's march from Ghazna, he was much rejoiced and advanced as far as Hansi to meet him. In the year AH 592 (AD 1196), they marched towards Thangar, and the center of idolatry and perdition became the abode of glory and splendour.."




Kalinjar (Uttar Pradesh)
"In the year AH 599 (Ad 1202), Kutub-d din proceeded to the investment Kalinjar, on which expedition he was accompanied by the Sahib-Kiran, Shamsu-d din Altmash... The temples were converted into mosques and abodes of goodness, and the ejaculations of bead counters and voices of summoners to prayer ascended to high heaven, and the very name of idolatry was annihilated. ."


b. Sultan Shamsu'd-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)
Delhi
"The Sultan then returned from Jalor to Delhi..and after his arrival 'not a vestige or name remained of idol temples which had raised their heads on high; and the light of faith shone out from the darkness of infidelity.. and the moon of religion and the state became resplendent from the heaven of prosperity and glory."


10. Name Of The Book: Kamilu't-Tawarikh
Name Of The Historian: Ibn Asir
About The Author: The author was born in AD 1160 in the Jazirat ibn Umar, an island on the Tigris above Mosul.
The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:


a. Khalifa Al-Mahdi (AD 775-785)
Barada (Gujrat)
"In the year 159 (AD 776) Al Mahdi sent an army by sea under Abdul Malik bin Shahabu'l Musamma'i to India. They proceeded on their way and at length disembarked at Barada. When they reached the place they laid siege on it. The town was reduced to extremities and God prevailed over it in the same year. The people were forbidden to worship the Budd, which the Muhammadans burned."




11. Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Jahan-Kusha
Name Of The Historian: Alaud-Din Malik ibn Bahaud-Din Muhammed Juwaini
About The Author: The author was born a native of Juwain in Khurasan near Nishapur. He was the Halaku during the Mongol campaign against the Ismai'lians and was later appointed the governor of Baghdad. He fell from grace and was imprisoned at Hamadan.
The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:


a. Sultan Jalalud-Din Mankbarni (AD 1222-1231)
Debal (Sindh)
"The Sultan then went towards Dewal and Darbela and Jaisi... The Sultan raised Masjid at Dewal, on the spot where an idol temple stood."


12. Name Of The Book: Mifathu'l-Futuh
Name Of The Historian: Amir Khusru
About The Author: The author, Amir Khusru was born at Delhi in 1253. His father occupied high positions in the reigns of Sultan Shamsu'd Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) and his successors. Reputed to be the dearest disciple of Shykh Nizamuddin Auliya, he became the lick-spittle of whoever came out victorious in the contest for the throne at Delhi. He became the court poet of Balban's successor, Sultan Kaiqbad.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a. Sultan Jajalu'd-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296)
Jhain (Rajasthan)
"The Sultan reached Jhain in the afternoon of the third day and stayed in the palace of the Raya he greatly enjoyed his stay for some time. Coming out, he took a round of gardens and temples. The idols he saw amazed him. Next day he got those idols of gold smashed with stones. The pillars of wood were burnt down by his order. A cry rose from the temples as if a second Mahmud has taken birth. Two idols were made of brass, one of which weighed nearly thousand ‘mans’. He got both of them broken, and the pieces were distributed among his people so that they may throw them at the door of Masjid on their return to Delhi."


b. Sultan Alaud-Din Khilji (AD 1296-1316)
Vidisha (Madhya Pradesh)
"When he advanced from the capital of Karra, the Hindus, in alarm, descended into the earth like ants. He departed towards the garden of Behar to dye that soil with blood as red as tulip. He cleared the road to Ujjain of vile wretches, and created consternation in Bhilsan. When he affected his conquests in that country, he drew out of the river the idols which had been concealed in it.




Devagiri (Maharshtra)
"But see the mercy with which he regarded the broken-hearted, for, after seizing the rai, he set him free again. He destroyed the temples of the idolaters, and erected pulpits and arches for mosques


13. Name Of The Book: Nuh Siphir
Name of the Historian: Amir Khusru
About the Author: The above mentioned book is the fourth historical mathnavi which Amir Khusru wrote when he was 67 years old. It celebrates the reign of Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a.. Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji (AD 1315-1320)
Warrangal (Andhra Pradesh)
"They pursued the enemy to the gates and set everything on fire. They burnt down all those gardens and groves. That paradise of idol-worshippers became like hell. The fire-worshippers of ‘Bud’ were in alarm and flocked round their idols…"


14. Name of the Book: Siyaru'l-Auliya
Name of the Historian: Sayyed Muhammed bin Mubarak bin Muhammed
About the Author: He was the grandson of an Iranian merchant who traded between Kirman in Iran and Lahore. The family traveled to Delhi after Shkh Farid's death and became devoted to Shykh Nizamu'd-din Auliya.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a.. Shykh Mu'in al-Din Chisti Ajmer (AD 1236)
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
"..Because of his Sword, instead of idols and temples in the land of unbelief now there are mosques, mihrab and mimbar. In the land where there were the sayings of the idol-worshippers, there is the sound of 'Allahu Akbar'...The descendants of those who were converted to Islam in this land will live until Day of Judgement; so too will those who bring others into the fold of Islam by the sword of Islam. Until the Day of Judgment these converts will be in debt of Shaykh al-Islam Mu'in al-din Hasam Sijzi..."


15. Name of the Book: Masalik'ul Absar fi Mamalik'ul Amsar
Name of the Historian: Shihabu'd-Din 'Abu'l Abbas Ahmed bin Yahya.
About the Author: He was born in AD 1301. He was educated in Damascus and Cairo. He is considered to be a great man and scholar of his time and author of many books. He occupied high positions in Syria and Egypt.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a. Sultan Muhammed bin Tughlaq (AD 1325-1351)
"The Sultan is not slack in Jihad. He never lets go of his spear or bridle in pursuing jihad by land and sea routes. This is his main occupation which engages his eyes and ears. Five temples have been destroyed and the images and idols of ‘Budd’ have been broken, and the lands have been freed from those who were not included in the daru'l Islam that is, those who had refused to become zimmis. Thereafter he got mosques and places of worship erected, and music replaced by call to prayers to Allah... The Sultan who is ruling at present has achieved that which had not been achieved so far by any king. He has achieved victory, supremacy, conquest of countries, destruction of the infidels, and exposure of magicians. He has destroyed idols by which the people of Hindustan were deceived in vain..."








16. Name of the Book: Rehala of Ibn Battuta
Name of the Historian: Shykh Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim al-Lawatt at-Tanji al-Maruf be Ibn Battuta.
About the Author: He belonged to an Arab family which was settled in Spain since AD 1312. His grandfather and father enjoyed the reputation of scholars and theologians. He himself was a great scholar who traveled extensively and over many lands. He came to India in 1325 and visited many places. He was very fond of sampling Hindu girls from different parts of India. They were presented to him by the Sultan Mohammed bin-Tughlaq with whom Ibn Battuta came in close contact. He also married Muslim women wherever he stayed and divorced them before his departure.


a. His Travel description:
(Delhi)
"Near the eastern gate of the mosque, lie two very big idols of copper connected together by stones. Every one who comes in and goes out of the mosque treads over them. On the site of this mosque was a bud Khana that is an idol-house. After the conquest of Delhi, it was turned into a mosque..."


17. Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Firuz
Name of the Historian: Shams Siraj Alif
About the Author: The author became a courtier of Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq and undertook to complete the aforementioned history of Barani who had stopped at the sixth year of Firuz Shah's reign.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a. Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq (AD 1351-1388)
Puri (Orissa)
"The Sultan left Banarasi with the intention of pursuing the Rani of Jajnagar, who had fled to an island in the river...News was then brought that in the jangal were seven elephants, and one old shoe-elephant, which was very fierce. The Sultan resolved upon endeavoring to capture these elephants before continuing the pursuit of the Rai... After the hunt was over, the Sultan directed his attention to the Rai of Jajnagar, and entering the palace where he dwelt he found many fine buildings. It is reported that inside the Rai's fort, there was a stone idol which the infidels called Jagannath, and to which they paid their devotions. Sultan Firoz, in emulation of Mahmud Subuktign, having rooted up the idol, carried it away to Delhi where he placed it in an ignominious position."


b. Nagarkot Kangra(Himachal Pradesh)
"..Sultan Muhammed Shah bin Tughlaq and Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq were sovereigns especially chosen by Almighty from among the faithful, and in their whole course of their reigns, wherever they took an idol temple they broke and destroyed it."


Delhi
"A report was brought to the Sultan that there was in Delhi an old Brahmin who persisted in publicly performing the worship of idols in his house; and that people of the city, both Musalmans and Hindus, used to resort to his house to worship the idol. The Brahmin had constructed a wooden tablet which was covered within and without with paintings of demons and other objects. An order was accordingly given that the Brahmin, with his tablet, should be brought into the presence of the Sultan at Firozabad. The judges and doctors and elders and lawyers were summoned, and the case of the Brahmin was submitted for their opinion. Their reply was that the provisions of the Law were clear: the Brahmin must either become a Musalman or be burned. The true faith was declared to the Brahmin, and the right course pointed out, but he refused to accept it. Orders were given for raising a pile of faggots before the door of the darbar (court). The Brahmin was tied hand and foot and cast into it; the tablet was thrown on top and the pile was lighted. The writer of this book was present at the darbar and witnessed the execution. The tablet of the Brahmin was lighted in two places, at his head and at his feet; the wood was dry and the fire first reached his feet, and drew him a cry, but the flames quickly enveloped his head and consumed him. Behold the Sultan's strict adherence to law and rectitude, how he would not deviate in the least from its decrees!"
Here Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq glorifies his own criminal acts in Bharat as sanctioned by the "holy" Koran.


18. Name of the Book: Futuhat-i-Firuz Shahi
Name of the Historian: Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq
About the Author: Sultan had got the eight chapters of his work inscribed on eight slabs of stone which were fixed on eight sides of the octagonal dome of a building near the Jami Masjid at Firuzabad.


a. Prayers of Temple-destroyers in this Book
"The next matter which by God's help I accomplished, was the repetition of names and titles of former sovereigns which had been omitted from the prayers of Sabbaths and Feasts. The names of those sovereigns of Islam, under whose happy fortune and favour infidel countries had been conquered, whose banners had waved over many a land, under whom idol-temples had been demolished, and mosques and pulpits built and exalted..."


Delhi and Evirons
"The Hindus and idol-worshippers had agreed to pay the money for toleration (zar-i zimmiya) and had consented to the poll-tax(jiziya) in return for which they and their families enjoyed security. These people now erected new idol-temples in the city and the enviorns in opposition to the law of the Prophet which declares that such temples are not to be tolerated. Under divine guidance I destroyed these edifices and I killed those leaders of infidelity who seduced others into error, and the lower orders I subjected to stripes and chastisement, until this abuse was entirely abolished. The following is an instance: In the vilalge of Maluh, there is a tank which they call kund (tank). Here they had built idol-temples and on certain days the Hindus were accustomed to proceed thither on horseback, and wearing arms. Their women and children also went out in palankins and carts. Then they assembled in thousands and performed idol-worship. ...when intelligence of this came to my ears my religious feelings prompted me at once to put a stop to this scandal and offence to the religion of Islam. On the day of the assembly I went there in person and I ordered that the leaders of these people and the promoters of this abominations should be put to death. I destroyed their idol-temples and instead thereof raised mosques."


Gohana (Haryana)
"Some Hindus had erected a new idol-temple in the village of Kohana and the idolators used to assemble there and perform their idolatrous rites. These people were seized and brought before me. I ordered that the perverse conduct of the leaders of this wickedness should be publicly proclaimed, and that they should be put to death before the gate of the palace. I also ordered that the infidel books, the idols and the vessels used in their worship, which had been taken with idols, should all be publicly burnt. The others were restrained by threats and punishments, as a warning to all men, that no zimmi could follow such wicked practices in a Muslaman country."


19. Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Mubarak Shahi
Name of the Historian: Yahya Ammad bin Abdullah Sirhindi
About the Author: The author lived in the reign of Sultan Muizu'd-Din Abu'l Fath Mubarak Shah (AD 1421-1434) of the Sayyid dynasty which ruled at Delhi from AD 1414-1451.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a. Sultan Shamsu'd-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)
Vidisha and Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh)
"In AH 631 he invaded Malwah, and after suppressing the rebels of that place, he destroyed that idol-temple which had existed there for the past three hundred years. Next he turned towards Ujjain and conquered it, and after demolishing the idol-temple of Mahakal, he uprooted the statue of Bikramajit together with all other statues and images which were placed on pedestals, and brought them to the capital where they were laid before the Jami Masjid for being trodden under foot by the people


20. Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Muhammadi
Name of the Historian: Muhammed Bihamad Khani
About the Author: The author was the son of the governor of Irich in Bundelkhand. He was a soldier who participated in several wars. His history covers a long period - from Prophet Mohammed to AD 1438-39
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:


a. Sultan Ghiyasu'd-Din Tughlaq Shah II (AD 1388-89)
Kalpi (Uttar Pradesh)
"In the meanwhile Delhi received news of the defeat of the armies of Islam which were with Malikzada Mahmud bin Firuz Khan...This Malikzada reached the bank of the Yamuna via Shahpur and renamed Kalpi which was the abode and center of the infidels and the wicked, as Muhammadabad, after the name of Prophet Muhammed. He got mosques erected for the worship of Allah in places occupied by temples, and made that city his capital. "


b. Sultan Nasiru'd-Din Mahmud Shah Tughlaq (AD 1389-1412)
Prayag and Kara (Uttar Pradesh)
"The Sultan moved with the armies of Islam towards Prayag and Arail with the aim of destroying the infidels, and he laid waste both those places. The vast crowd which had collected at Prayag for worshipping false gods was made captive. The inhabitants of Kara were freed from the mischief of rebels on account of this aid from King and the name of this king of Islam became famous by this reason."
Another Moghul ruler by the name of Babur who was in love with a young boy named Baburi glorifies his lecherously Islamic deeds in the Babur-Nama.


21. Name of the Book: Babur-Nama
Name of the Author: Zahiru'd-Din Muhammed Babur
About the Author: The author of this book was the founder of Mughal dynasty in India who proclaimed himself a Padshah (Ruler) after his victory in the First Battle of Panipat (AD 1526), and a Ghazi (killer of kafirs) after the defeat of Rana Sanga in the Battle of Khanwa (AD 1528) While presenting himself as an indefatigable warrior and drug-addict he does not hide the cruelties he committed on the defeated people, particularly his fondness for building towers of the heads of those he captured as prisoners of war or killed in battle. He is very liberal in citing appropriate verses from the Quran on the eve of the battle with Rana Sanga. In order to ensure his victory, he makes a covenant with Allah by breaking the vessels containing wine as also the cups for drinking it, swearing at the same time that "he would break the idols of the idol-worshippers in a similar manner". In the Fath-Nama (prayer for victory) composed for him by Shykh Zain, Allah is described as "destroyers of idols from their foundations" The language he uses for his Hindu adversaries is typically Islamic.
a. Zahirud-Din Muhammed Babur Padshah Ghazi (AD 1526-1530)
Chanderi (Madhya Pradesh)
"In AH 934 (AD 1528), I attacked Chanderi and, by the grace of Allah, captured it in a few hours. We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been a daru'l-harb for years, was made into daru'l-Islam. "


Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh)
"Next day, at the time of the noon prayer, we went out for seeing those places in Gwalior which we had not seen yet. Going out of the Hathipole Gate of the fort, we arrived at a place called Urwa. Urwa is not a bad place It is an enclosed space. Its biggest blemish is its statues. I ordered that they should be destroyed... "


a. Name of the structure: Quwwat al-Islam Masjid
Location: Delhi in Uttar Pradesh
Inscription:
"This fort was conquered and the Jami Masjid built in the year 587 by the Amir(*), the great, the glorious commander of the Army, Qutub-ud-daula wad-din, the Amir-ul-umara Aibeg, the slave of the Sultan, may Allah strengthen his helpers. The materials of 27 idol temples, on each of which 2,000,000 Delhiwals(** ) had been spent were used in the construction of the mosque."
*The Amir mentioned above was Qutubud-Din Aibak, slave of Muhammed Ghori.
**"Delhiwal" was a high denomination coin current at that time in Delhi.


b. Name of the structure: Mansuri Masjid
Location: Vijapur in Gujrat
Inscription:
"The Blessed and Exalted Allah says, 'And verily, mosques are for Allah only; hence invoke not anyone else with Allah.' This edifice was originally built by the infidels. After the advent of Islam, it was converted into a mosque. Sermon was delivered here for sixty-seven years. Due to the sedition of the infidels, it was again destroyed. When during the reign of the Sultan of the time, Ahmad, the affairs of each Iqta attained magnificence, Bahadur, the Sarkhail, once again carried out repairs. Through the generosity of Divine munificence, it became like new."


c. Name of the structure: Masjid at Manvi
Location: Manvi in Karnataka
Inscription:
"Praise be to Allah that by the decree of the Parvardigar, a mosque has been converted out of a temple as a sign of religion in the reign of the world-conquering emperor, the Sultan who is the asylum of the Faith and the possessor of the crown, who's kingdom is young, viz. Firuz Shah Bahmani, who is the cause of Exuberant spring in the garden of religion, Adu'l-Fath the king who conquered. After the victory of the emperor, the chief of chiefs, Safdar (the valiant commander) of the age, received the fort. The builder of this noble place of prayer is Muhammad Zahir Aqchi, the pivot of the Faith. He constructed in the year 809 from the Migration of the Chosen (prophet Muhammdad) this Ka'ba like momento."


d. Name of the structure: Mausoleum of Shykh 'Abdullah Shah Changal
Location: Dhar in Madhya Pradesh
Inscription:
"The centre became Muhammadan first by him(*) (and) all the banners of religion were spread... This lion-man came from the centre of religion to this old temple with a large force. He broke the images of the false deities, and turned the idol temple into a mosque. When Rai Bhoj saw this, through wisdom he embraced Islam with the family of his brave warriors(**). This quarter became illuminated by the light of the Muhammadan law, and the customs of the infidels became obsolete and abolished."
*Shykh 'Abdullah Shah Changal
**In this case the Hindu King was Bhoj II and during his reign Jalalu'd-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296) of Delhi invaded Malwa. Changal was the Muslim missionary who accompanied Khalji's army. This army after plundering and looting the kingdom of Bhoj II converted a Hindu temple into a mosque and forced the ruler and his subjects to accept Islam.






e. Name of the structure : jama masjid
Location : malan in gujrat
Inscription:
"Allah & his grace, when divine favour was bestowed on khalil shah. He build jama masjid for the decoration of islam. " he ruined the idol house and the temples of polytheist, ( and) completed the masjid and pulpist in its place. Without doubt, his building was accepted by allah.




F. Name of the structure: shrine of shah madar
Location: narwarin madhya padesh
Inscription:
"... (the prophet) on him be peace, says' he who buils the mosques in the world, the exalted allah builds for him a palace in paradise. 'In the auspicious time of the government and peaceful time of mahmud shah, son of muhammed shah, the sultan, the jami, mosquewas constructed on the hill of the fort malun (or malwan ) by khan-i-azam ullugh khan...at the requestofbthe thandar kabir, (a son of diya), the building was constructed by the son of ullugh khan who is magnanimous, just, generous, brave and who suppressed the wretched infidels. He eradicated the idol- houses and mine of infiDelity, along with the idols, the back of every stone because the palace for prostration of the believer...




G. Name of the structure: jama masjid
Location: amod in gujrat
Inscription:
Dilawar khan, the chief among the king's viceroys caused the mosque to built which is like a place of sheler for the favourites, infidelity has been subdued, and islam has triumphed because of him. The idols have bowed to him and the temples have been razed to the ground alongwith their foundation, and mosques and worship houses are flowing with riches.


H. Name of the structure: hanuman darwaza masjid
Location: jaunpur in uttar pradesh
Inscription:
"Thanks by the guidance of everlasting and the living allah, this house of infidelity beame the niche of prayer. As a reward for the builder in paradise.




I. Name of the structure: jama masjid
Location: ghoda in Maharashtra
Inscription:
"O allaho muhammed! O ali! When mir muhammed zaman made up his mind he opened the door of posperityon himself by his own hand, he demolished thirty-three idol templesa and by divine grace laid the foundation of a building in the abode of perdition.


J. Name of the structure: gachinala masjid
Location: kurnool district in andhra pradesh
Inscription:
"He is allah, may be glorified during the august ruleof ... muhammedshah, there was a well established idol-house in kuhmum... muhammed salih...razed to the ground, the editice of the idol-house and broke the idols in a mainly fashion. He constructed on its site a suitable mosque, towering above the building of all,.




Note: works of Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi, and Sita Ram Goel have been used in this article.
[This articles and more information at www.stephen-knapp.com]

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Our Dusty tomes Of Philosophy



We are like a student of aloneness.
We rifle through pages of verse,
which speak of it.
We pore over dusty tomes of philosophy
and rhetoric,
In the dim lamp light,
Our eyes dry and squinty,
We run over each line with my finger as if we are searching
for deep treasure,
as if among these poets, philosophers,
mystics or fakes -
We might find a word,
a sentence even,
that will satisfy
this curiosity
of alone.

The school may be elusive,
bound up in dark cloud,
but not so harsh anymore.
We even try and come as close as we can.
We sit on my cushion cross legged
and wait
and wait
for that utterly blinding moment
that moment
( so beautiful )
when our aloneness transforms itself
into our closest
and dearest
comfort.

We will be lucky when this happens,
because it doesn't always.
But it drives us back to our seat again,
and again,
even kicking and screaming,
and sometimes terrified,
back to our alone school
because we so crave that moment.

Maybe that's a bad thing. Who can say?
But truthfully -
We crave it more than we have ever,
ever craved.




Thursday, October 30, 2014

BRAVE IMMORTAL KSHATRIYA RAJPUTS



"रजपूतण रो जायो हूं रजपूती करज चुकाऊंला,
ओ सीस पड़ै पण पाघ नही दिल्ली रो मान झुकाऊंला"
∼ कन्हैयालाल सेठिया




"What do you know of tradition? You have known only the pen. I have known of men whose swords move more wisely than philosophy."




वीरता का सबूत




एकबार अकबर का दरबार लगा हुआ था. नवरत्नों में से राजधानी में कोई उपस्थित नहीं थे. लोग अपने फरियादें सुना रहे थे. तभी बादशाह सलामत के चोबदार ने
घोषणा की, कि दो राजपूत युवक बादशाह के सामने कुछ निवेदन करना चाहते हैं. अकबर की आज्ञा से दोनों नवयुवक दरबार में उपस्थित हुए. लम्बे, छरहरे, शक्तिशाली ढाल और तलवार से युक्त. बड़ी ही ख़ूबसूरत नज़र आ रहे थे. केसरिया पगड़ी,चूड़ीदार पायजामा, सर गर्व से ...उन्नत. सारे दरबार कि आँखे,
उनकी ओर लगी थी. उन्होंने बादशाह को झुककर सलाम किया और चुपचाप खड़े हो गए. बादशाह ने कहा- हमें बताया गया था कि तुम कुछ फ़रियाद करने आये हो. बादशाह सलामत, हम राजपूत हैं. हमारा निवेदन यही है कि हमें वीरोचित कोई काम सौंपा जाय. हमने सुना है कि आप वीरों और विद्वानों के पारखी हैं और आप उन्हें सम्मान देते हैं. आप अपनी सेना में हमें रख लें और असंभव वीरता के काम सौंपे. सारा दरबार उनके बाते सुन रहा था. अकबर ने कहा- हमें कैसे भरोसा हो कि तुम वास्तव में वीर हो? कोई सबूत ?
.....दोनों नवयुवकों ने एक दुसरे कि ओर देखा. उनमे से एक ने कहा-बादशाहह
सलामत, हम राजपूत हैं....| हमें तो मालूम ही नहीं है कि सबूत क्या होता है और कैसे दिया जाता है....| बादशाह कि आँखे लाल हो गयी | दरबार में कोई नवरत्न नहीं था जो बात को संभाल सके. बीरवल आने ही वाले थे, पर किसी काम से आ न पाए थे. बादशाह गरजा- तो फिर तुम वीर हो यह कैसे कह सकते हो? हर कोई आदमी अपनी वीरता का ढोंग रच सकता है. हमें तो सबूत चाहिए...... या तो सबूत पेश करो या फिर चले जाओ.......| यह दरबार डींग हांकने वालों के लिएनहीं है. तिरस्कार भरी बादशाह के बातें सुनकर दोनों युवकों की आँखों में खून उतर आया, पर वह बादशाह अकबर का दरबार था. उन्हें अपनी वीरता का सबूत देना ही था. उन नवयुवकों ने अपनी कुल देवी भवानी का स्मरण किया, बादशाह के सामने सर झुकाया और फिर अपनी-अपनी तलवारें म्यान से खीच ली. ......फिर तो उन्होंने तलवारबाजी के वो करतब दिखलाये कि सारे दरबारी भौंचक्के रह गए. खुद बादशाह अकबर हैरान रह गए. उन्होंने बड़े-बड़े तलवार बाजों को देखा था, पर ये दोनों वीर तो अद्भुत थे. बिजली कि कड़क कि तरह तलवारें बरस रही थी. एक घंटे से ऊपर हो गया था. उनके शारीर से जगह-जगह से खून बह रहा था. .......तभी जय भवानी के स्वर के साथ एक नवयुवक कि तलवार कौंधी और उसने दुसरे नवयुवक का सर धड से अलग कर दिया. दुसरे युवक ने गिरते-गिरते भी ऐसा वार किया कि पहला नवयुवक मरणासन्न जमीन पर लोट गया. .........बादशाह अपने गद्दी छोड़कर दौड़े. यह क्या गजब हो गया. यह कौन सी नादानी की इन अद्बुत तलवार बाजों ने ? ऐसे शूरवीर तलवार के धनी, मौत से बिलकुल बेख़ौफ़ | यह क्या हो गया. बादशाह उस मनासन्न युवक के पास पहुंचे. मरते-मरते ही उसने कहा, बादशाह हम राजपूत हैं. जिंदगी और मौत में हम कोई फासला नहीं मानते, आपने सबूत माँगा. वीरों के पास वीरता का सबूत कैसा? हम तो जागते, सोते, लड़ते मौत को तलवार की नोंक पर टाँगे चलते हैं. कहते-कहते उसकी आँखे मूँद गयी. बादशाह शोक से भर गए. ........तभी घोषणा हुयी कि राजा बीरबल आ पहुंचे हैं. उनके आते आते शायद किसी ने घटना की सूचना दे दी थी. बादशाह को सलाम करते हुए बीरबल बोले, सम्राट मुझे आने में देर हो गयी. मैं होता तो आपसे प्रार्थना करता कि राजपूतों से
वीरता का सबूत कभी न मांगे. उनके पास वीरता का केवल एक ही सबूत होता है, मौत को हँसते-हँसते गले लगाना. बादशाह अकबर की आँखे गीली हो गयी.




राख सदा मन रजपुती, पुरखा आळी आण ।
भुजा भरो जय भगवती, पुणीत करो प्रमाण ।।
_____________________________________________
हे! माँ भगवती मेरे मन मे रजपुती वाले भाव पुनः भर दो जो हमारे पुर्वजो की आन बान रही है ।
और मेरे भुजाओं में पुनः वो बल भर दो जो हमारे इतिहास को पुनः प्रमाणीत कर सकें ।।
.
.
Mother Bhagwati ! please fill my mind with Rajputi sentiments, which is revealing our ancestors. And fill my arms again with a force that can authenticate our history again.
.


जय क्षत्रिय/ जय राजपूत


THE HEROIC RESISTANCE OF IMMORTAL RAJPUTS TO THE ONSLAUGHTS ISLAMIC INVADERS


1.Battle of kasahrade(1178)-Mularaja-II defeated Mu'izz ad-din Muhammad Ghori.


2.Battle of Ranthambore(1290)- Hammir Deo Defeated Jalaludin Firuz Khilji


3. Siege of Ranthambore(1236,1248,1253,1283) Recaptured/defended from Razia,Nasir Ud Din Mahmud, Malmuks.


4. Seige of Ranthambore(1301)- Hammirdeva defeated Allaudin khilji's Generals Ulugh khan And Nusrat Khan


5.Battle of chittor/singoli(1301) - Rana Hammir Singh Defeated Mohammed Bin Tughlaq


6.Battle of Nagaur(1456)-Rana Khumba Defeated Combined armies of shams khan(sultan of nagaur) and Qutbuddin(sultan of gujrat)


7.Battle of Mandalgarh(1448)- Rana Khumba defeated Sultan Mahmud khilji and established tower of victory at Chittor Called Vijay Stambh.


7.Battle of Dewair(1582)-Maharan Pratap defeated Mughal generals and recover his kingdom.


8.Battle of Dewar(1606)- Rana Amar Singh Defeated Sultan Khan ,The Mughal Prince Mohammed Parviz Fled from battle field with his commander Asaf khan.


9.Battle of Sambhar(1709)- Rajput Raja's of amber, udaipur and jodhpur Joint attack and killed Sayyid Hussain Khan Barha and regained Jodhpur,Udaipur,Bayana,Amer by night attack.....


कहाँ-कहाँ हराए और कितनी बार हराए....!
There has been a flurry of articles from left leaning "Bharat Breaking leechtuals” and nouveau Pistorians, indulging at lengths into imaginative thinking and blatant lying, even falsely accusing Rajput king of the heinous crime of rape. A scroll article was spreading this lie when vigilant Twitter Users caught them lying and they had to remove that article. They are doing all this just to serve one divisive agenda; make Rajputs and in turn India’s pride look like a failure that Indians should steer away from, and in turn follow the manipulative ideologies of fake secularism and leftism that has been cancer to the society rotting it from within. Each one of these hate monger leftists, a Jaichand in their own right. These wannabe historians will try to convince you that these stories are false. According to their logic; locals of Chittor worship Queen Padmavati, have her temple, her story of valour passed across generations,




Queen has family descendants, all this came into being just because a poet wrote a poem “Padmavat”. They will tell you local testimony and geographical proof count for nothing. Family traditions have no value. They will still deny your argument and push their lies.


It’s incredible, the lengths they can go to malign India’s pride. This is a recurrent theme of their propaganda. Padmavati defaming is just one in this series of lies and manipulation.




HOW DID THE IMMORTAL RAJPUTS ARE COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE WORLD?




Here is the story of resistance that they don’t want you to know:


After the death of Prophet Mohammad, the newly formed Caliphates started attacking neighboring civilizations indiscriminately. In 633, they attacked Persia, Mesopotamia, Egypt, entered and captured sizable amount of Europe including Spain, parts of France, USSR etc.


Within 20 years of invasion, the entire Persian empire had fallen (633-652), thoroughly rampaged and completely converted in the next few years. Zoroastrian religion was destroyed. Iran is 1/3rd the size of India.


Ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia (present Iraq), Egypt, and others got ruined and completely converted to Islam within 20 years of Islamic Invasion. Even Spain and parts of Europe had been captured and converted. Their combined geographical size was more than double that of India.


Europe and Spain were later won back by Christian crusaders.






SO HOW IS BHARAT (INDIA) STILL HINDU MAJORITY




When we say Rajputs lost miserably, shouldn’t we have a yardstick? Who are we comparing the performance with? Ancient Egypt, Persia, Spain, Iraq, Syria? They all fell during Islamic Invasion. Why is India still not completely converted?


Was it the large-heartedness of these Islamic invaders whose sole aim was to kill “idol worshippers”?. The kind of invaders who would not even spare women and children, why were they so nice to Hindus?


Only a docile fool would believe that they were actually nice to Hindus. India is still Hindu because of 2 majors reasons:


Hindus loved their religion and were not ready to give it up even when faced with death
There was a perpetual armed resistance from different corners of India against the attack on their culture and religion. And Rajputs played a significant role in this resistance. Sikhs Empire and Marathas led valiantly by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj joined in around 1700AD, after a 1,100 years in the fight against the Islamist invaders.:


Till almost 400 years (600-1000 AD), Islamic invaders were defeated comprehensively and on multiple occasions, in Afghanistan and in Kashmir.




India’s outermost wall of resistance fell in 1000 AD Mahmud defeated Samrat Jaypala, a scion of the Hindu Shahiya dynasty of Kabul. This dynasty had been for long been the doorkeeper of India in the Northwest.


A mistake that can be pointed out is that, Rajputs kings were defending and Arabic attackers were playing offensive. They would get defeated and would gather again, under same or different banner and attack again. Hence, defensive game would only cause loss of property. They should have been offensive instead. But this can only be seen in the hind sight.




200 years after this, with the fall of Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan another major wall of India had been breached.


Indian legends say Chauhan defeated and pardoned Ghori 16 times until Ghori won the 17th time. while historians argue on how many times Ghori was defeated and let go, it is clear that he was pardoned multiple times.


But disagree with North Indian kingdoms didn't fell like pack of cards after his defeat. Rajputs rulling Gujarat and Mewar at that time would defeat the army of the same Ghori and would survive for next 100 years. Rajputs in gauda again had few moments left to its history with daring raid of Vishwarup Sena to Kashi occupied by Muslims . Malwa also survived. Overall defeat of Prithviraj Chauhan as key decisive event of Indian history is highly exaggerated narrative as well. If you have to take one key decisive event then it was sudden and dramatic fall of Hindu Shahi Rajput rulers of Punjab and Kabul which really altered the scenario.


3 generations of Shahi rulers vanished in mere 20 years, It was sudden and dramatic. Even Kalhana recognized that. Overall it was most fierce and yet unrecognized struggle that any medieval Hindu Rajput kingdom gave to the invading Islamic armies on first contact. Similarly defeat of Shahis should be seen with first Islamic invasions of northern India and demise of Pratihara empire. Which was even more drastic


One can blame Rajputs for not being united and being naive as they didn’t expect Ghori to break rules of formal warfare and attack in the most “cowardly” fashion in the nighttime. Cheating has never been the Indian way of warfare, but Rajputs were naïve indeed to think these looters will play by the rules of the war, . But the biggest lie of last century was unity is strength. Actually it's unite to surrender.


Right thinking Britons are for Brexit, but wanted unity in it's colonies




Another aspect to it is that Rajputs never changed their fighting tactics where as invaders learnt with every attack and improvised. They never could match Rajput valour that's why it took 700 yrs for islamic invasion to enter India






ALSO, RAJPUTS DIDN'T EMPLIY SPIES LIKE ISLAMIC INVADERS. THEY DIDN'T USE "SUFIS" IN GUISE OF SPIRTUAL SEEKERS, WHO WOULD SPY ON INDIAN TERRIOTORY AND THEN BRING ISLAMIC INVADERS ALONG TO ATTACK.






Example, a Sufi Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti played an Important role in providing Ghori intelligence. Chisti came to India presenting himself as a realized Sufi, and settled in Ajmer to spy for Ghori, He was an advisory to Ghori, later he came with Ghori to attact Prithviraj. Chisti’s dargah is still thronged by many in Ajmer Sharif, blissfully ignorant of the fact that Chisti was the spy that worked as a Sufi saint.






Yes, Rajputs were naive this way. And it did cost them heavily.


Why were the Rajputs and Indian resistance losing mostly?


Simply because of the numbers.


Attacks on neighboring civilizations by Arabs had got a fresh lease of life with adding religion in the equation, with the promise of heaven, war booty and sex slaves. The result, looters from across central Asia were joining to fight for the Islamic forces. Thus, there was never a shortage of foot soldiers.


With the fall of the protectors of India’s western and Northern frontiers came in a huge supply of people from across Asia, coming into India to loot in the name of Islam. These included the convertors and the fresh converts.




The numbers were so skewed in the favor of Muslims that often the Rajput Kings knew they were facing certain death.


This disparity in number always remained. Army of small Rajput states that was in the range of 3000 – 5000 was no match for this number. Khilji had an army of around 4,75,000,




Compare this with the 3000-4000 that Queen Padmavati’s husband King Rawal Ratan Singh had as Army. Anybody including Padmavati and Ratan Singh could guess what would be the outcome. Thus the women committed Jauhar.


Additionally, these invaders always had reinforcements. For example, Aibak got reinforcements from Ghazni. It was clear that any resistance to Islamic dominance meant certain defeat and destruction. Yet, Outnumbered they were always there to fight big opponents, they have to be good warriors since even small rajput principalities caused big trouble.


Maharana Pratap fought with an Army of Man Singh that was sent at the direction of Akbar. In the battle of Haldighati, Mann Singh had an army 5 times the size of Maharana Pratap’s and still Ranaji defeated Man Singh. When Man Singh called for fresh reinforcement and Akbar himself came with huge reinforcement of Army. Again, the numbers made it clear what the outcome would be. Maharana Pratap had to retreat.




Maharana Pratap started using Guerilla warfare and caused immense damage to Akbar.


Using Guerilla strategy, Maharana Pratap recovered many of his lost territories including Kumbhalgarh, Udaipur, Gogunda, Ranthambore and the areas around Chittor, although not Chittor itself. During this period, he also built a new capital, Chavand, near modern Dungarpur. His successful defiance of Mughals using guerrilla strategy also proved inspirational to laterday heroes like Chhatrapati Shivaji who used it brilliantly against Mughal forces or Veer Kunwar Singh of Bihar who used it against the British.






THUS, WE SEE IMMORTAL RAJPUTS WERE FACED WITH EXTREME ODDS, YET THEY DIDN'T SUBMIT. IT WAS BRAVERY AND RESOLVE OF IMMORTAL RAJPUTS THAT DESERVES A FAIR SHARE OF CREDIT AND RESPECT. IT WAS THE SWORDS OF THE IMMORTAL RAJPUTS THAT SAVED INDIA FROM TURNING INTO A AN IRAQ, IRAN OR AFGHANISTAN.




हारने वालो का भी अपना रुतबा होता हैं मलाल वो करे जो दौड़ में शामिल नही थे..
They were defeated by Ghazni, Ghuri, Khalji, Babur, Akbar, the Marathas and the British But one QUESTION Lost means gone, right? How to lose again and again???






Desperate Leftist who got so much triggered when our Home Minister Rajnath Singh Praised MahaRana Pratap in 2015 on Maharana Pratap Jayanti that they left no Stone Unturned To post a Complety Malicious ,ill-researched his own fairy tale articleLets Start From Facts and Stats..What His Malicious-Article Clearly Lacked and Unfortunatly Has Gained a Lot of Popularity and Created an Stereotype That Rajput Lost ALL WARS: -




The Arabs
A. Bappa Rawal(Founder of Mewar Guhil(Sisodia) Dynasty) and Nagabhata 1 Pushes the Arabs Across the Indus (c 740 AD)
Nagabhata 1 was the founder of the imperial Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty that ruled most of present-day Rajasthan, Gujarat, Sindh and Madhya Pradesh from its capital at Ujjain and later Kannauj during the seventh to eleventh centuries AD. The Gurjara-Pratiharas are believed to be the ethnic predecessor of the modern-day Rajputs. It was under Nagabhata 1 that the first waves of Arab invasions rocked the south-western frontier of the Indian subcontinent. Led first by Muhammad bin Qasim and later by Al Junayd, the Arabs not only conquered Sindh and Multan but also made inroads into Rajasthan and Gujarat, thus bringing them into conflict with the Gurjara-Pratiharas. However, the Gurjara-Pratiharas under Nagabhata 1 not only checked the Arab advance into Gujarat but also forced them to retreat as far as the west bank of the Indus River. Bappa Rawal Penetrated deep into Sindh and gave Arabs a beating So bad that they could’nt dream of attacking india for next 300 year his heroics against the Arabs raised Bappa Rawal’s status to such an extent that he wrongly came to be regarded as the founder of the dynasty of Mewar

The Twenty-four battles

B.Khuman II, Rawal: He was the thirteenth ruler of Mewar (r. 828–853) and he succeeded his father Rawal SINHA. Khuman II ruled for twenty-five years from Chittorgarh, and gained the nickname of Mighty Warrior after repelling a Muslim force that attacked the capital. It is believed that, during Khuman’s reign, a formidable Islamic force of the Arab Caliph of Baghdad, Al-Mamun, the second son of Harun-al-Rashid raided Chittor. (The caliph’s forces were finally halted in the east at the walls of Chittor and, in the west, at Tours, in the heart of France, where Charles Martel had defeated them in 732 during the reign of Bappa Rawal). In all, Khuman II fought twenty-four great battles against these invaders, and Chittorbecame a rallying point for Hindus, Mewar thus gained the honourable reputation as the guardian of Hinduism. After Khumann’s great struggle there followed fifteen generations of kings at Chittor who were engaged in intermittent warfare against new waves of Muslim invaders. A younger son, Mangal Raj, killed Khuman II in an effort to gain the throne, however his elder son, MAHAYAK, succeeded him : Khuman Gaani : invoked even today as a greeting and a blessing. “Many Salutations to Khuman”
Conclusion
Rajput:Victorious,Successfully Stopped Islamic Calliphate
Marathas: . Marathi, which evolved from Maharashtri Prakrit, has been the lingua franca from the 9th century onwards.thus comparing Maratha’s now would be absurd
Pashtuns:Converted successors of hindu shahi…

The Ghazni
NOTE:Ghazni Never Ruled any Indian Territory But is Know To Have Raided India 17 times(Record of Only 10 Raid’s exists though)(Only Area’s of Punjab and once in his last raid Gwalior)He talk of Ghazni but would Sahane ever take initiative to call Maratha(his own community) Lost To DurraniIndian campaign of Ahmad Shah Durrani - Wikipedia
Ahmad Shah Durrani raided India for eight times between 1748 and 1767. After the assassination of Nadir Shah, Ahmad…en.wikipedia.org
HE LOOTED INDIA 8 TIMES AT THE PEAK OF MARATHA POWER
(such invasions are sudden and posses less chance’s of failure despite of Once strength,Take for example regular Pakistan terrorist infiltration and ceasefire)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -The Forgotten Battle of Bahraich, 1033 CE-Raja Suheldev:
The Indian history of the last millennium is the history of the heroic resistance to foreign invasions & rule. From 8th…www.shankhnad.org
The Only Open-field Rajput-Ghazni Supermacy Battle that occurred was Battle Of Bahraich in which a Coallation of Rajput King Was Victorious under Leadership of Suhaldev and Raja Bhoja of Malwa ,what Girish Sir missed to mention of..
Mahmud was followed by his nephewMasood Ghazni. Continuing Mahmud’s legacy, he invaded India with an army of more than 100,000 men in May 1031 AD. Unlike Mahmud’s army which was basically a raiding party, Masood’s army was backed by the imperial army and had attacked India with the intention of permanent conquest and Islamization of India.
King Anandpal Shahi tried to check this invasion along with the king of Sialkot. But, this alliance was overwhelmed by the superiority in numbers of the invading army. Masood continued his advance towards Indian mainland. King Mahipal Tomara also tried to check their advance but he was also defeated. After victories across Northern Indian plains, Masood camped at Bahraich which is near Lucknow.
Meanwhile, a historic alliance was being created under Raja Suhaldev and the famous Raja Bhoja of Malwa(a Parmar Rajput). 17 Indian RajputKings together forged an alliance. This was the biggest confederation that has ever existed in India.


On 13th June, an army of about 1,20,000 descended on the Ghazni camp of Bahraich. Masood’s army was completely besieged and encircled. Each and every man in Masood’s camp was killed. The battle ended on 14th June with the victory of the Hindu-Rajput federation.
The invasion was completely crushed and such resounding was this victory that none of foreign kingdoms dared to invade India for the next 160 years.

Conclusion
Rajputs:Failed to Stop Raid’s but Successfully Stopped Ghazni’s from rulling even a single inch of indian territories
Pashtuns:served Ghazni,no reason to fight them

The Ghori
Now we all know about prithviraj Chauhan….he cleary writes rajput lost to Ghori..but his article which criticize PrithviRaj for 2nd Battle of Tarain didn’t thank him for countless battles he had won before



not maybe 16 but indeed proof exist that for Several times Ghurid’s Invasion was Expelled by Prithviraj,most notably 1st battle of tarain(Go thru wikki to look at his Extraordinary Reign)


‘Battle Of Gujrat or Kasahrada’





In Which Mulraja and his fellow Rajputs of Gujrat defeated Ghori so decisively that he reverted that to Afganistan even rulers of south praised him for his victory and he Successfully Stopped Islamic expansion on reaching south and central india ,also the occupied Rajput territories were contantly under rebellion by Rajputs which greatly weakend his control and they ruled only over 10% of northern Indian territories for a Very Short Period of time,the loss of delhi was the only prominent lost







most of India Is stil beyond their reach


Conclusion
Rajput:Successfully restricted Ghurid invasion after loss of delhi





Wikki Abstract(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_of_Ghor)…The 2nd Battle was lost due to a Night Attack ,This Defeat is not something an Indian Hindu should be proud of


Pashtuns:Served Ghazni,no reason to fight them

The Delhi Sultanates




looking this map doesn’t make Rajput losers,Unless only you argue for winning Delhi,which Rajputs were never really fond of,they believed in chivalric system of warfare rather than conquest



A.Khalji dynasty(1290–1320)



the first delhi sultanat Dynasty.…and Most and Only Successfull Dynasty Against Rajputs ,the one that rajputs falied to stop penetration but even then invincible khalji who have Known to have defeated even mongols and remained undefeated most of the time were defeated By A Rajput Hammirdev of Ranthambore. He gave a tough fight till his last breathe to Allaudin Khalji. He also killed 2 of Allaudin’s generals Ulug Khan and Ahmed Khan. He is also known to have defeated Allaudin’s uncle Jalaudin Khalji and forced him to retreat back to Delhi.

When Allaudin laid a sieze on the fort of Ranthambore, for 3 yrs Allaudin was not able to capture the fort. After several unsuccessful attempts by Allaudin Khalji, Khalji’s soldiers started pelting stones on the fort to weaken the walls of the fort. In this process one of the generals of Allaudin, Dost Khan, got injured. Upon hearing this, Hammirdev entered into battlefield and killed Dost Khan.
However within 3 years, food and other resources available in the fort got exhausted and people who had taken shelter in the fort had to starve with hunger. Hammirdev decided to do face to face fight(Saka) in the open battlefield. Hammirdev with his small army fought against the huge army of Allaudin Khalji bravely.

The Wife of Hammirdev Rangadevi alongwith other women of the royal family committed Jauhar(self immolation). All the soldiers of Hammirdev got killed in the battlefield. Hammirdev too got injured. Hammirdev himself decapacited his own head in front of the idol of Goddess Jagdamba as a tribute to her. And thus, the life of a brave warrior ended in the fight for his nation.

AND RAJPUTS ARE PROUD OF IT,WE WILL TAKE PRIDE IN OUR MARTYR'S,


In all of his empire it was only much weaker and scattered Rajputs who revolted and fought the most against him(actually any Indian can but your ‘Sickcular’ policy had made him a hero of Rajput only,How Ironic!!Thanks to thequint.com and ofcourse Scroll.com)
Conclusion
Rajputs:Fought hard but ‘smallindependent rajput states’lost;Khalji Victory
Pashtun:Served Khalji
Martha:Served Khalji, Yadava dynasty( Kannada-speaking Hoysalas), which ruled most of present-day Maharashtra, was overthrown by the Delhi Sultanateruler Ala-ud-din Khalji



b .Tughlaq (1320–1414)



Strongest Delhi Sultanat ,captured almost entire India However his Empire Collapsed Due Two Fold Resistance BY 1.Vijaynagar 2.Rajputs(again) under Hamiir Singh Sisodia of Mewar who united all rajputs kings of rajputana and defeated him at BATTLE OF SINGOLIand liberated much important entire Rajputana.




Conclusion
Rajput:Rajput Victory,Successfully liberated present day Rajasthan
Pashtun:Served Timurid Empire
Maratha:Served Tughlaq, Tughluq conquered parts of the Deccan, and temporarily shifted his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad in Maharashtra. After the collapse of the Tughluqs in 1347, the breakaway Bahmani Sultanate. governed the region for the next 150 years from Gulbarga and later from Bidar



C.Sayyid (1414–51)


Weakest almost lost to any Rajput state,notably being Mewari we know once Rana Mokal in his teenage slaughaterd sayyids hard when they tried to invade mewar

Conclusion
Rajput:Decisive Rajput Victory
Pashtuns:Served Timurid Empire
Marathas:Served Bahmani Sultanate



D. The Sultanates of Gujrat,Malwa and Nagaur



The Man Who Never Lost a War in 35 years of his regin

Kumbha of Mewar - Wikipedia
Kumbhakarna (r. 1433-1468 CE), popularly known as Rana Kumbha in vernacular legends, was the ruler of Mewar kingdom of…

Go through Wikkipedia to know How Alone This Warrior and Brave Son of Mewar Crushed The neighbouring Sultanates….


While the Muhammadan’s destroyed Bana Mata temple ,the principle goddess of house of mewar

Battle of Mandalgarh and Banas 

In A.D. 1442 Rana Kumbha left Chittor to invade Haraoti. Finding Mewar unprotected, the Sultan of Malwa, Sultan Mahmud.

Despite that the Rana Kumbha of Mewar had the word ‘Allah’ carved in Arabic nine times in the third storey and eight times in the eighth.to cherish religious pluralism under his reign.

The Vijaya Stambha is an imposing victory monument located within Chittorgarh fort in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, India…

Conclusion
Rajput:Decisive Rajput Victory




4. Lodhi (1451–1526)



The Afghan Lodis replaced the Tughlaqs and the Saiyids as the reigning monarchs in Delhi at the start of the sixteenth century. However, Rajputs continued to remain a thorn in their flesh. Liberated in the 1330s from Muslim rule, most of Rajasthan continued to remain independent, operating politically as a loosely bound confederacy of Rajput states under the informal but widely acknowledged suzerainty of the Maharanas of Mewar.
Alarmed at the power of the Rajput confederacy, Ibrahim Khan Lodi(sikandar lodhi was bit succesfull but was badly defeated by rajputs of mewar and Gwalior which stopped further expansion) was left with no choice but to take to the battlefield. The resultant battles of Khatoli (1518), fought near present-day Kota, and the battle of Dholpur (1519) resulted in the complete rout of the Afghans. The victory brought the Rajputs within a day’s march from Agra and Delhi, while also putting them in control of almost all of Malwa (central India).
The Lodis spent the next few years that were left to them, by providence, in constant fear of the Rajputs. By the time the Lodis were finally extinguished by Babur, at the first battle of Panipat in 1526, their empire had shrunk to only a fragment of the early Islamic conquests of Alauddin Khalji and Qutb-ud-Din Aibak.


The Rajputs meanwhile had grown to be the strongest military power in north India, having outlived and outlasted all their adversaries — the Arabs, the Turks and the Afghans — over the last 500 years.





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dholpur (15,000 rajputs vs 40,000 Pashtuns)
(First time a small Hindu defending force defeated larger invading forces in an open battle field — Hussain Khan taunted his fellow nobles from Delhi: “It is a hundred pities that 30,000 horsemen should have been defeated by so few Hindus. )


While Sahane called Rana Sanga a mere chief who lost and took beating only lets look at sanga military history who had know to have won 100 battles and fought 18 legendary battles with the Muhammadans

Under Sanga, Mewar State remained a hegemonic power among all kingdoms of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Malwa region. He must have a better military record than that of a “defeat specialist” to unnerve the Emperor of Afghanistan to call his war on the former “Jihad against infidels and apostates” .

Sanga’s first major battle was subjugation of Rajputs of Idar state (Gujarat) in 1514. In 1517, he defeated an alliance of Idar’s Rajputs and Gujarat Sultanate, putting his vassal at Idar. In 1517, Sanga helped Medini Rai wrestle Mandu leading to Turkic Sultan Mahmud Khilji II’s escape to Gujarat. In 1519 at battle of Gagron he defeated an alliance of Gujarat Sultanate and Malwa Sultanate, arresting Khilji II who he restored after six months only when the latter gave Chanderi and Ranthambore fort. In the same battle, he actually had the wounded Gujarat Sultan (a self-confessed Rajput) nursed in his tent (Ferishta, Erskine). In 1517, Sanga defeated Ibrahim Lodi, the Pathan ruler of Agra at the battle of Khatoli , though lost his arm ; many Pathans changed allegiance to him . In 1519 he again defeated Ibrahmin Lodi at Dholpur. After this, his influence reached Pillai Khar near Fatehpur Sikri in Agra (Medieval History Part 1; Satish Chandra; pg-222). In 1520, he led the siege of Ahmedabad against the Gujarat Sultan. His only embarrasment was the Chittor siege 1524 by Gujarat and Malwa Sultans. Is this record of a “defeat specialist”?

Conclusion

Rajput:Decisive Rajput Victory

Pashtuns: By the 16th century western Afghanistan again reverted to Persian rule under the Safavid dynasty,While Their Lodi Empire Was overthrown by the Babur
Maratha:Served Bahmani Sultanate,After the break-up of the Bahamani sultanate in 1518, the Maharashtra region was split ibetween five Deccan Sultanates: Nizamshah of Ahmednagar, Adilshah of Bijapur, Qutubshah of Golkonda, Bidarshah of Bidar and Imadshah of Elichpur.These kingdoms often fought with each other. United, they decisively defeated the Vijayanagara Empire of the south in 1565.

5.Mughal Empire(under Akbar):




In 1576, after the fourth summon failed, Haldighati was invaded; Man Singh (son of Bhagwandas) and Syed Hashim Barha led 5,000 to 10,000 strong Imperial force — mostly Rajputs and Pathans. The beleaguered forces saw Pratap-led Rajputs, Bhils led by Rana Poonja Bheel and Pathans led by Hakimkhan — 3000 soldiers. After initial success, the release of Imperial reserves forced the beleaguered troops to retreat, failing to break stalemate (Satish Chandra;Vol-II; p-120 to 121). Anyone calling it “victory” or “defeat” is distorting history. In the following months, the Emperor joined the fray and as Pratap was hunted, he temporarily lost all the three fortresses too.

In 1585, with Imperial focus diverted, Pratap conquered most Mewar and consolidated hold over it. He died peacefully in 1597, unlike his three predecessors.

From 1598 to 1605 during Rana Amar’s rule , several expeditions were sent including Prince Salim’s expeditions in 1599 and 1603 but with little success. From 1605 to 1613, Emperor Jehangir sent several expeditions under Prince Pervez, Mahtab Khan and Abdullah Khan, but were repelled. In 1613 Jehangir himself arrived and camped for two years. With heavy toll of life , depopulation and ruination of agriculture, Amar Singh finally accepted a treaty in 1615. He was 56 years old back then and died four years later. He ruled and fought as sovereign for 18 of his 22 year rule (Satisch Chandra; Vol-II;122) against the might of the Imperial Mughal army which was also hugely dependent on Rajput-recruitment.
A Highlight Why Rana Pratap was Most Successfull Insurgent King Against Akbar And His imperial Forces
First of all Akbar never fought against Maharana. But if you are asking if Maharana was ever able to defeat mughals then my answer is yes definitely he defeated them several times.


Battle of Dewair -Fought in 1582,Rana Victory made Mughal flee all 36 Checkpost they installed in Mewar To Dominate Rana and allies
Capturing kumbhalgarh- Rana defeated mughal army in kumbhalgarh and won back the historic fort (4 times repelled mughal Attack Afterwards).
Rana also won back Udaipur(an Almost Impossible task)
Rana invaded Dhundhar(Jaipur Region) to teach Man Singh a lesson
Rana also won several other battles against mughals he captured 83 0f 85 forts of Mewar
Satish Chandra(a Leftist Himself and a Renowned Historian,But Unbaised unlike Sahane To Call MahaRana a mere looser of Haldighati)

MahaRana Pratap’s defiance of the mighty Mughal empire, almost alone and unaided by the other Rajput states, constitute a glorious saga of Rajput valour and the spirit of self sacrifice for cherished principles. MahaRana Pratap’s methods of sporadic warfare was later elaborated further by Malik Ambar, the Deccani general, and by Shivaji.

Battle of Dewar A Notable Victory For Mewar and Rana Amar Singh That Entitled Him the Title of ‘CHAKRAVEER’Battle of Dewar - Wikipedia
The Battle of Dewar was fought between Amar Singh I of Mewar and Jahangir's army under Parviz and Asaf Khan IV. Shortly…en.wikipedia.org









So there is definitely something quite different even in the non-revisionist , actually Left-liberal history-works that smoothly rebutts the Girish Sahane-inspired Scroll gobbledygook .
Eventualy:
1.mewar — -Definatly not lost they Challenged Superior Mughal for Over 88 years and eventually signed a peace treaty favorable to Mewar…the rana never bowed and continued rule as an independent entity..and even challenged Mughal from time to time
Other states:
now here controversy starts..’Rajput sold their Daughter To mughal’ first of all theres a lot of
Difference between marriage and to sold ..sibling from rajput princesse(Jahangir and shah jahan) were made emperor but not from sayyid or Persian or pashtun wives(other outside races) or of their native mughal tribe It’s The rest of state entered into diplomacy yes Rajputs did lost to Mughal but were diplomatically more successful now what questionable is hindu giving daughter to muslim..well its because you haven’t heard of Lalabai wife of Rana Udai Singh and had a son Sahib Khan,half brother of Maharana pratap or Bibi Mubarak Mughal wife of Man Singh Kachwaha


Rao Chandrasen Fought all his lifetime against Imperial Forces and Akbar won Marwar only after death of Rao,he thus called forgotten hero of Marwar. He defended his kingdom for nearly two decades against relentless attacks from the Mughal Empire.

Chandrasen Rathore - Wikipedia
Several Rajput States most notably Kingdom of Bikaner Defeated Humayun When Mughals Under him tried to Conquer Rajputana.





Turk lutera Akbar attacked present day himachal pradesh Kangra fort 52 times. Yes 52 times!!

Every single time he was defeated by brave Katoch rajputs.
And Guess what Jahangir sat outside fort for 2 years attacked several times and lost but final won when a hindu helped him ,
Conclusion
1.Rajput:Failure indeed Rajput history remains mired in controversies between the Right’s appropriation of it and the Left’s polemic against it , but this period gave rajputs its most celebrated warrior MahaRana Pratap ,Rani Durgavati, Chatrasal Bundela, Rana Raj Singh, Rao Rao Chandrasen and Durgadas Rathore…first time rajput states accepted a Secondary position
2.pashtuns:Failed to stop mughal invasion,gave a tough fight but eventually lost to mughal army led by Man Singh Kachwaha
3.Marathas:The ruling sultanates accepted mughal supremacy,the Marathas served their subordinate sultanates chief’s

6.Mughal Empire(Under Aurenzeb):
Rajput Helped Mughals untill their Interest were not Compromised,Here Again The Rajputs prove Metal and emerge Victorious though not as Grand as The Rise of Marathas but Enough that anyone if not Suffering from Schizophrenia would never-ever call this a defeat

Rajput Rebellion Under Rana Raj
Contemporary of Aurangzeb who was opposed to Islamic intolerance of Aurangzeb. He gave refuge to a Rajput woman who was being pressurized to marry Aurangzeb. Infuriated Aurangzeb attacked Mewar with a vast army. But Mughals were defeated and driven back. A close friend of Durgadas Rathore of Marwar.

Battle of Udaipur (1680) — Aurangzeb attacked Mewar and plundered Udaipur, the citizens were safely escorted to the aravalli hills by Rana Raj Singh but 63 temples in and around Udaipur were plundered and many villages were burned down by Aurangzebs general Taj Khan. The Mughal army was eventually starved out of Mewar because of the scorched earth techniques and guerrilla warfare used by the Rana. Aurangzeb after a failed campaign left Mewar to his son Akbar and retreated to Ajmer.
Battle of Aravalli hills (1680) — In the second half of 1680, after several months of such setbacks, Aurangzeb decided on an all-out offensive. Niccolao Manucci, an Italian gunner in the Mughal army, says: “for this campaign, Aurangzeb put in pledge the whole of his kingdom.” Three separate armies, under Aurangzeb’s sons Akbar, Azam and Muazzam, penetrated the Aravalli hills from different directions. However, their artillery lost its effectiveness while being dragged around the rugged hills and both Azam and Muazzam were defeated by the Rajputs under Durgadas Rathore and Rana Raj Singh.
NOTE:in a letter to Aurenzeb by Akbar he wrote that none none of Mughal general was ready to face the rajput’s feared from the techniques of Rana Raj and Durgadas Rathore the mughal force’s begain flee from mewar and marwar
2. Durgadas Rathore and The Thirty Years War Between Marwar and the Mughal Empire (1678–1707 AD)

Durgadas Rathore is one of those figures of Indian history whose name remains alien to most Indians, but who would have been justly celebrated as a national hero had he been born in any other nation.



A painting of Durgadas Rathore by the German artist Archibald H Muller (Wikipedia)
A loyalist of the king of Marwar (Jodhpur), Durgadas Rathore stood up to the might of Aurangzeb as the latter tried to deviously annex the kingdom to his domains. The kings of Jodhpur had earlier made their peace with the Mughals in return for nominal suzerainty over their domains. The ruler of Marwar, Jaswant Singh, was serving the Mughal state as a high-ranking general posted in Jamrud, Afghanistan. However, when Jaswant Singh died in Afghanistan, and factional feuds among the Rathore nobles broke out over the control of the kingdom of Marwar, Aurangzeb saw an opportunity to annex the kingdom completely to the Mughal state and depose of the ruling Rathore Rajputs. As the Mughal armies advanced on Jodhpur, Durgadas Rathore fled the city with the sole surviving son and heir of Jaswant Singh — the infant Ajit Singh.
For the next three decades, as the young Rajput Ajit Singh came of age, Durgadas Rathore lived as a fugitive and fought a series of battles against the Mughal army with his faithful band of followers. He also attempted to forge alliances with various powers in his fight against Aurangzeb — including the Marathas and Aurangzeb’s rebellious son, Prince Akbar. Though he achieved limited success in these battles, his continued rebellion remained a constant source of concern to Aurangzeb, who tried to entice him to enter the Mughal service by making repeated offers of land and rank. Eventually, after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, Durgadas seized Jodhpur and expelled the occupying Mughal forces. Ajit Singh Rathore was installed as the rightful heir to the throne of Jodhpur and Marwar regained its independence.


Battle of Jodhpur (1707) — Durgadas Rathore took advantage of the disturbances following the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 to seize Jodhpurand eventually evict the occupying Mughal force out of Marwar.[39]



🔥Triumph of Hindus was Complete🔥










Maharaja Ajit Singh captured Marwar in a fierce attack.

Mughals were killed & held captive.




All mosques were razed to ground & Temples were reinstated on every single 1 of them.

Mughals were made to chant Rama Nam




Saviors of Sanatan










All of this happened in 1708.




Even though Rajputana felt the direct attacks for 1200 yrs, not even 1 city is been named 'Abad' with muslim population still less than 9%, same case with Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Uttrakhand, wherever Rajput's population was higher. Blessed to be native of rajputana where culture & religion floats up not like others where indian culture vanished due to so called "Open broad minded society " Abad lore bay dras




Men of Steel they were. There is a reason why by 1800's except for few nawab states all of the rest were under control of Hindu Rajput Kings. That in itself say who finally conquered in long drawn battle.
Conclusion
1.Rajput:Several Rajput states resorted to rebellion, Ajit Singh and Durgadas made Aurangzeb bite dust in Rajputana. Aurangzeb alongwith his 3 eldest sons were on mission to suppress the Rathores but couldnt succeed. In fact Rathore made one of the Aurangzeb's son turn against him. Rana Raj Singh of Mewar defeated Aurangzeb Thrice.


Maharaja Jaswant Singh of Marwar broke mosques & built temples on them during Aurangzeb's rule.


Kunwar Bhim Singh broke 300 mosques in Gujarat in retaliation to Aurangzeb's farman on Temples.

Only Mughal emperor to b killed by an Indian was killed by Maharaja Ajit Singh of Marwar, mughal emperor was Farukhsiyar.

Kaha hai ye history books me?

Sawai Jai Singh got mughals to remove Jaziya & Bathing tax at Gaya.

Evn after all this,our history is strategically sidelined & ignored both by left & right.






2.pashtuns:Several pashtun tribe like rajput’s resorted to rebellion
3.Marathas:The heroic maratha rise under Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj,often regarded as greatest indian emperor from here onward’s the more celebrated history of Maratha’s start, The "Maratha" empire headed by Chitpavan Peshwas and later made up of Pathan pindaris didn't rule from Attock to Cuttack. It looted and destroyed towns , forcing inhabitants to pay "chautth" but could never hold these territories permanently.

7.The Marathas and British
A.Maratha
The Rajputs were no match for the European armed and French trained sepoys under Benoit De Boigne, his European tactics were far superior to the traditional Indian warfare that the Rajputs followed.



Benoît de Boigne gives an eyewitness’s account of a charge that took place: “it is impossible for me to describe the feats of bravery performed by the Zard-Kaprawalas(Saffron-clad Rajput’s During Battle of Merta 1790) or forlorn hope of the enemy. I have seen, after their line was broken, fifteen or twenty men only return to charge one thousand infantry, and advance within ten or fifteen paces of our line, before they were all shot.” “It is but just to the enemy to acknowledge that, considering the situation in which they were found, and the disorder consequent thereto, they behaved very valiantly, as they actually cut down some of our people at their guns, and two of them with a desperate fury and intrepidity, made at De Boigne himself and might possibly have killed him if they had not been hewn in pieces by his bodyguards
The Maratha Consolidated Hold Only in late 1790 and lost in 1818 the Maratha influence in Rajputana was for a short period of time but enough that they Caused a sort of Genocide(much like they did in Bengal)after khilji only martha did so much destruction ,yet Rajput did lost to maratha but later under british Destroyed Maratha power,for which Maratha themselves are to be blamed of ……………..
NOTE:it was only Dynasty of Rajasthan,the purbia rajput were themselves employed by Maratha to fight against Rajasthani Rajput’s
CONCLUSION
1.Rajput:Several Rajput states looted and raided by maratha’s. internal rebellion and bankruptcy of several prominent states at it’s peak
2.pashtuns:unlike rajput’s the pashtuns regain their unity under Abadali to give rise to strongest pashtun empire,the Durrani Empire
3.Marathas:The maratha confederacy Became overload of almost entire present-day india
B.British





The Rajputs and British,Thanks To Maratha, Their Brutal Invasion Made Rajputana Hollow plagued by internal rebellion here and there further Surrounded by afgans,maratha and mughals left no Choice but To Sign the Last Treaty of Peace after centuries of Battles the Rajput indeed Even Mewar was Helpless(Thanks to Holkar’s and Scindias for their Sudden Night Attack’s that almost entire population of chittorgarh was perished in hour’s) The The Treaty was highly respectable to both parties thus to maintain order and save it’s citizen from autocracy of a foreign power the king’s joined hand with the British……..So did each and every community and became as loyal to British and served them than any other,Sikh Fought the Famous Battle of Saragahi not for their empire but for British…….
A Question that Haunts:Ok Everyone Served ,but why no Anglo-Rajput War
ans:Maratha Brutal Invasion,There was No Reason for already demolished Rajputs to raise arms against the Brits,but remember majority of rajput state’s of Bihar ,UP and Himachal fought against Britisher’s most notably that of JagdishpurKunwar Singh - Wikipedia
Kunwar Singh was born in November 1777 to Maharaja Shahabzada Singh and Maharani Panchratan Devi, in Jagdispur of the…en.wikipedia.org


अंग्रेजों के विरूद्ध राजपूतों का महायुद्द


बिहार :


कुछ भारत तेरे टुकड़े गैंग राजपूतों पर तंज कसते हुए कह रहे थें कि अंग्रेजों के समय में राजपूत कहां थे ?....तो सुनो राजपूत 1000 वर्षो तक जिस तरह मुसलमानों से लड़ते रहें,उसी तरह वें अंग्रेजो से भी पुरे देश में लड़ते रहें।बेहतर होगा कि आप इतिहास को अच्छी तरह से अध्ययन करें।आज मैं 1857 की क्रांति में बिहार के राजपूतों के योगदान पर चर्चा करूंगा।
........
...बिहार में क्रांति का नेतृत्व का जगदीशपुर रियासत के राजा वीर कुंवर सिंह ने नेतृत्व किया।वह भी उस 80 वर्ष के बुढापे के उम्र में जिस उम्र में लोग लाठी का सहारा ले लेते हैं लेकिन उन्होनें तलवार का सहारा लिया था।25 जुलाई 1857 को बिहार के दानापुर के भारतीय सैनिकों ने विद्रोह कर दिया और वें सभी जगदीशपुर जाकर वीर कुंवर सिंह के सेना में शामिल हो गये।कुंवर सिंह ने सेना को संगठित कर अंग्रेजो से युद्ध किया।


.....कुंवर सिंह को साथ देने के लिए बिहार के विभिन्न क्षेत्रों से अनेक राजपूत जागीरदार और जमींदार भी आएं जिनका नाम है---पीरो परगना का तहसीलदार हरिकिशन सिंह अपने चारों भाई लक्ष्मी सिंह,अजीत सिंह, आनन्द सिंह और राधसिंह ने इस क्रांति में भाग लिया इन चारों को अंग्रेजो ने काले पानी की सजा दी थी।


.........विर कुंवर सिंह के साथ अंग्रेजों के विरूद्ध जिन राजपूतों की महत्वपुर्ण भूमिका रही उनका नाम है सासाराम के निशान सिंह चौहान ,गाजीपुर के सिधा सिंह और जोधा सिंह,रामेशर सिंह ( अंग्रेजी सेना का बागी सुबेदार ), सुन्दर सिंह (जनरल पद पर ), भजन सिंह ( चावर,भोजपुर अंग्रेजी सेना के बागी सुबेदार ) , राणा दालान सिंह (क्रांति परामर्श दाता ), जीवधन सिंह (खुमदनी ,गया का जमींदार), बिहियां कुमान का कमाण्डर लक्ष्मी सिंह (भदवर ,भोजपुर ), कान सिंह ,काशी सिंह (प्रधान सेनापति ), रणबहादुर सिंह (गाजीपुर का जमींदार ), शिवबालक सिंह (क्रांति के जनरल ),हरि सिंह हेमतपुर (भोजपुर का जमींदार )।


.......हजारा सिंह (भोजपुर-बलिया का जमींदार ),मनकुब सिंह (अंग्रेजी सेना के बागी सिपाही) ,जगमाल सिंह (बागी सिपाही ), उदति सिंह ,द्वारका सिंह , शिवधर शरण सिंह,आनन्द सिंह (घुड़सवार सेना के जनरल ), रामनारायण सिंह (बागी सिपाही ), राधे सिंह,भोला सिंह (गोला-बारूद प्रभारी ),देव सिंह ,साहिबजादा सिंह ,राम सिंह (बागी सुबेदार ),तिलक सिंह और भारू सिंह(बागी सुबेदार ), तिलक सिंह (बागी सुबेदार )।


......18मार्च 1858 को आजमगढ के पास अतरौलिया में कुंवर सिंह के नेतृत्व में राजपूतों ने अंग्रेजो के विरूद्ध घोर युद्ध किया यह यूद्ध चार दिन तक चला 22 मार्च को अंग्रेजी सेना हार गई।उसके बाद कर्नल डेम्स के नेतृत्व में अंग्रेजी कमांडर मिलमैन की सहायता के लिए आई किंतु राजपूतों ने उसे भी पराजित कर दिया।डेम्स भागकर आजमगढ किले में छिप गया।उसके बाद बनारस पर चढाई किया गया तो इससे घबड़ाकर लार्ड कैनिंग घबड़ाकर बड़ी सेना भेज दी।6 अप्रैल को युद्ध हुआ लार्डमार्क हार कर भाग गया किंतु कुंवर सिंह ने पिछि कर उसे आजमगढ के किले में कैद कर लिया।उसे साथ देने लगर्ड आया वह भी हार गया।जब वें गंगा पार कर जगदीशपुर आ रहे थे तो डगलस के नेतृत्व में अंग्रेजी सेना पिछा करती आ गई और गोली चलाने लगा एक गोली उनके दांये हाथ में लगी विष फैलने के डर से उन्होने तलवार से अपना हाथ काट दिया।


.......उनके जगदीशपुर पहुंचने के 24 घंटे बाद ही लिग्रैण्ड के नेतृत्व में फिर अंग्रेजी सेना ने आक्रमण कर दिया।यहां पर भी 23 अप्रैल 1858 को बुरी अंग्रेजों की हार हुई।उसके बाद जगदीशपुर शासन करने लगे वे पुरी तरह अजेय रहें किंतु युद्ध में इतने बुरी तरह से घायल हो गये थे कि तीन दिन बाद 26 अप्रैल 1858 को स्वर्ग सिधार गयें।


अंग्रेज इतिहासकार होम्स इनकी वीरता पर मुग्धर होकर अपनी पुस्तक में लिखता है----The Old Rajput who has fought so honourabluy and so bravely against the british power died on 26 april 1858


..........वीर कुंवर सिंह के स्वर्गावास के बाद अमर सिंह गद्दी पर बैठें उन्होने भी डगलस और लगर्ड की सेना से युद्ध लड़ा।


बिहिया,हातम
पुर ,दलीलपुर आदी तीनों जगह अंग्रेजो की इस तरह हराया की 15 जुन 1858 को जनरल लगर्ड को त्यागपत्र देना पड़ा।उसके बाद उसने कसम खायी की मै अमर सिंह को हराकर ही नौकरी में लौटुंगा 19 अक्टुबर को नोनुदी गांव मे फिर घोर युद्ध हुआ।अंग्रेज अमर सिंह के हाथी तक पहुंचे लेकिन वे हाथी से कुदकर निकल पड़े इसके बाद अमर सिंह का कहीं पता न चला।


.......अंग्रेजी काल में बिहार के कुछ और राजपूत वीरों ने अंग्रेजो से लोहा लिया जिनमें मुंगेर जिले गिद्धोर रियासत के राजकुमार कालिका सिंह, ठाकुर बनारसी प्रसाद सिंह इन इलाको से नन्दकुमार सिंह,श्याम सिंह ,नेमधारी सिंह तो शाहाबाद के हरिहर सिंह,सारण के प्रभुनाथ सिंह ,सारंगधर सिंह आदी हजारीबाग से रामनारायण सिंह समस्तीपुर से सत्यनारायण सिंह ,शिवपुर से नवाब सिंह आदी बहुत से बिहार के राजपूतों ने राष्ट्रीय आंदोलन में भाग लिया।


Conclusion
Every Community of Indian Subcontinent lost and served the British,The Rajput population was hardly 2–3% blaming Rajput’s only is an attempt to defame our community




Well Mr. Javed Akhtar, list is infinite .... you need to correct your facts !


Thakur Roshan Singh


Ram prasad Bismil Tomar


Thakur Gulab Singh Tomar


Thakur Babu Bandhu Singh


Veer Kunwar Singh Panwar


Thakur Prithvi Narayan Shah


Wazir Ram Singh Pathania




पंजाब के वीर राजपूत वज़ीर राम सिंह पठानिया जी को कोटि कोटि नमन जरूर करें , हुकुम जी वो वीर हैं जिन्होंने कभी गुलामी नही स्वीकार की 21 साल की उम्र में पूजा वाले लोटे से 100 अंग्रेज मार गिराए थे....अद्भुत वीरता रजपूती परचम को नमन कीजिये


Raja Udit Narayan Pratap Singh


Amar Shaheed Mahaveer Singh Rathore


Captain Ram Singh Thakur


Thakur Ranmat Singh




Thakur Khushal Singh Auwa
( A victory pillar was erected in 1957 to commemorate the role of Auwa village in the Revolt of 1857)


Rao Gopal Singh Kharwa


Babu Maigar Singh Ji


Devi Baksh Singh Ji Visen


Rani Tulash Kanwar Amorha


Raja Balbhadra Singh Ji Chehlari


Maharani Ishwari Devi


Chauhan Rani Anupnagar


Raja Digvijay Singh Umargarh


Kalu Singh Mahara ( Kumaon Uttrakhand )


Veer Amar Singh Bihar


Raja Rambaksh Singh Bainswara


Shyam Shah Singh Rewa


Nikumbh Shrinet


Rana Benimadhav Baksh Singh Bais


Thakur Kishor Singh hindoriya


Thakur Devi Singh Jabalpur


Sarju Prasad Singh


Jagirdar Narpati Singh Ruiya


Thakur Surajmal Dakor ( Lunawada )


Veer Narayan Singh Sonakhan


Raja Shankar Shah Gor ( Purva )


Jodhara Singh


Mamu Bhanje Jhala ( Jhalawar )


Thakur Shaktidan Singh ( Jodhpur )


Bhero Singh Jodha


Harnath Singh Thakur


Heera Singh Nanta ( Kota )


Maharana Bhaktawar Singh Rathore ( Amjhera , MP )


Kamdar Bhawani Singh (Amjhera ,MP )


Thakur Vishwanath Shahdev (Badkagarh )


Jagat Pal Singh Pithoria


Rani Dropadi Bai ( Dhar )


Rani Hindoriya ( Damoh , Mp )


Jaitpur ki Rani


Veer Chandra Singh ( Pauri Garhwal )


Pancham Singh Rathore ( Karijog )


Maharaja Tej Singh Chauhan ( Mainpuri )


Maharaja Parmod Chandra Katoch ( Almora )


Raja Ummed Singh Jaswal


Thakur Sundar Singh ( Siba )


Bhawani Singh Rawat


Sulkhan Singh Hada ( Kalapani Saja )


Balwant Singh Awagar


Thakur Jhanku Singh Sisodia


Dada Shree 14 Rana Mandir Ke 14 rajput jo gardan katne k baad bhi lade the ~~~~~~


1. लाला झनकूमल


2. वजीर सिंह चौहान


3. साहब सिंह गहलौत


4. सुमेर सिंह गहलौत


5. किड्ढा गहलौत,


6. चन्दन सिंह गहलौत


7. मक्खन सिंह गहलौत


8. जिया सिंह गहलौत


9. दौलत सिंह गहलौत


10. जीराज सिंह गहलौत


11. दुर्गा सिंह गहलौत


12. मुसाहब सिंह गहलौत


13. दलेल सिंह गहलौत


14. महाराज सिंह गहलौत।



Mr. Javed Akhtar you are not a Historian !
A 👊🏻 reply from Maharana shri ji of Mewar to another BollywoodBhand



— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -

Despite Victories Why no Rajput Empire(A Question That Gave Writters like Sahane or Anyone Enough Confidence To Call Rajputs looser): — —
Now Comes the general talk from 6–7A.d to 1615 A.d A Rajput Warrior Suffered More wars and bloodshed then any of race described above we fought more varied enimies against differrnt technique and different weapons but why the Notion of Defeat Comes Up mainly because unlike Marathas or sikh a term called ‘rajput empire’ never existed wikki has the answere
The Rajput kingdoms were disparate: loyalty to a clan was more important than allegiance to the wider Rajput social grouping, meaning that one clan would fight another. This and the internecine jostling for position that took place when a clan leader (raja) died meant that Rajput politics were fluid and prevented the formation of a coherent Rajput empire
1. They were never over ambitious and expansionist and were mainly interested in defending their existing territories.They believed in chivalric war than war for conquest,the Rajput’s were more comparable to Knights who neither had an empire but are known to be fierce warriors
2. They were the first ones to be at the receiving end of any foreign aggression and you may attribute this reason as to why Southern Kingdoms were not the ones to suffer the onslaught.
3. They were more disciplined armies and believed in certain battlefield customs like fighting during daytime only unlike the invaders who would go to any extent to win a battle. Values mattered them more then mere wins.
4. Lastly and most importantly Rajputs never had any unity (You will get many examples starting from PrithviRaj to Maharana Pratap)among themselves which predominately led to their downfall and affected the country for years to come.

Rajput Consumed Opium,And had a Numerical Superiority In Each and Every Battle:MythBusting..
So The entire Question of Rajputs a failure is only to undermine credentials of Rajputs…now Sahane Sir talk of opium …when it comes to opium nothing beats Mughal’s,Akbar used to get asleep between court conversation ,2 of his son died due to excessive opium consumption and Jahangir was an absolute opium addict ,his empire was managed by his wife Nur Jahan(Mehr-un-Nissa) and yet The Empire Reached its Zenith Under her who kept the real power for nearly 20 years.



..opium was common to every elite…this was the most dumbest thing I have Read…You lost cause you consumed opium…
Poor defeat of maratha atBattle of Assaye - Wikipedia
The Battle of Assaye was a major battle of the Second Anglo-Maratha War fought between the Maratha Empire and the…en.wikipedie.org


Battle of Khadki - Wikipedia
After the battle, the East India Company troops crossed the river at a place called Yelloura ford which is still…en.wikipedia.org



Battle of Koregaon - Wikipedia
By the 1800s, the Marathas were organized into a loose confederacy, with the major constituents being the Peshwa of…en.wikipedia.org




Now He Talked of Two Battles
1.Battle Of Tarain


YES 120,000(Ghurids) vs 100,000(Rajput) so Where’s a 3:1 Ghurids like you would ofcourse praise themselves and Glorify their Victory Ghurids many of their records don’t talk of 1st battale of tarain either,They Ruled Much of Pakistan and Afganistan and where in no sense weaker than PrithviRaj Chauhan.


2.Battle of Khanwa (as per their source:-wikepedia)



NOTE:DEFECTED==BETRAY(TO CHANGE SIDE)
The Course of Battle Changed when 35,000 Soldiers In the Crucial 11th Hour of Fight Betray Sanga Forces…..
Initially
Sanga Force’s — 114,000
Mughals Force’s — -48,000
Finally(What The Senario Really was)
Sanga Force’s — 79,000
Mughals Force’s — -83,000(and His Cannons and Firepower Ofcourse)
SKADDOOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sir,you talk of poor strategy check this out




This Ended in 6 hours,leftist Beloved Sultan’s ‘The Strategic Masters’??If Only Thing that a Millitary Leader Like Rana Sanga Lacked that day was a bit Luck and heavy Firepower..


3.Battle of Giri-Sumel(A Notable Mention,of Our Defeat)
Now You Talk of Numbers and Stratgy Cannot be Completed By Mention Of Sher Shah And Battle of Giri-Sumel
NOTE:Rajputs Were The Only Hndu Unit To Have Stopped His Expansion Despite Loss Rao Maldeo Continued To Rule Half of Marwar Independently and Suri after This Pyrrhic Victory didn’t Dare to Challenge the Rathore’s Again.



When Sher Shah learnt the valour and gallantry of Jaita and Kumpa,Sher Shah is said to have commented that “for a few grains of bajra (millet, which is the main crop of barren Marwar) I almost lost the entire kingdom of Hindustan.” — Enough Said Go through Wikki To Understand what I’am Talking About ( and you know why this battle occur because babur overthrown son seeks sheler provided by rathore rulers which pissed the afghan sher shah )
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Now Compare Maratha vs Rajput Defeats?
Now This gives me right to write
Marathas lost to Durrani(afgans),the British,Rohilla’s,The Sikh(they Never Captured their Territories ),The Portuguese and kneeled down before French and only won against Mughal’s and already weakend Rajput’s minus hill Rajput rulers where marathas (though claim themselves also rajput ) Ruler found refuge.
At the time of Aurangzeb, The Most dominant Hindu Group in Mughal Army was Maratha, of 96 Marathas who held ranks of 1000 zat and above between 1679 and 1707 , 16 held ranks of 5K and above, 18 held ranks between 3K and 4K and 62 from 1000 to 2700 THUS FAR SURPASSING THE RAJPUTS.
Maratha noble’s helped Deccan sultanates(these Sultanat worse enemy of hindu) in every battle against Vijaynagar Empire that eventually led to their downfall it was Maratha cooperation that there sultanate’s existed for centuriesBattle of Talikota - Wikipedia
The Battle of Talikota (23 January 1565) was a watershed battle fought between the Vijayanagara Empire and the Deccan…en.wikipedia.org
however this Never let people question their Bravery ofcourse they had an empire(1674–1818)….expanded outside maharastra only in mid 18th centuary i.e a full flleged empire that existed for only 60 years and also never a united one that’s why easily lost to british despite being numerically superior in every war.In General RAJPUT and MARATHA Cannot be Compared a Rajput is an Genetic Identity while Maratha was more an Cultural or regional Indentity that rose to prominance in late age and perished Too quickly,often regarded as Death of an Empire Before it’s Birth
The part of confederacy was as follows
· the Peshwas of Poona
· the Gaekwads of Baroda
· the Holkars of Indore and Malwa
· the Scindias of Gwalior and Ujjain
· Bhonsales of Nagpur
· Even in the Maharashtra itself many knights were given semi-autonomous charges of small districts which led to princely states like Sangli, Aundh, Bhor, Bawda, Jat, Phaltan, Miraj etc.


Indian army liberated Marathwada from Muslims in 1948 not Shivaji,Peshwas or whatever. This is fact of recent history. No need to read primary source for this.

Note:See how easy it is prove one looser and look down upon them this is not against my Marathi brothers and Sisters but only a glimpse of how Rajput history is presented nowdays by writer’s likeGirish Sahane and Ruchika Sharma…we have lost count how many times he has shared his article to defame Rajputs and vilify our community and also had it published in several different Languages..and many more…A Marathi Brahman by himself if he love’s his Community then why Throw mud on other Community also Since Marathi are Called Champion’s of Hindutva(they are no Doubt i am sorry if my above para hurt sentiments of any marathi out there reading)There was No better Example that Maratha vs Rajput to Highlight what Our Textbook Don’t Tell Us……….
I was deeply hurt when a Rajput resort to self shamming after reading
Scroll Complety Malicious article …The Article Byfar Has been Largely Successfull in Portraying Rajputs as the mere looser.




One cannot imagine the duress in which they fought , protect their home land in the period from 6–7 AD to 1818 AD a period of more than Ten centuries. We did not become another Iran , another Uzbekistan , another Turk .We are what we are due to sacrifice of these warriors whatever may be the weaknesses they might have contained due to social/political backwardness .The Only Place where Rajput’s really looked like a fool is the failure to create an empire even when they had opportunity but Continued to Rule their Small Kingdom’s Independently With Pride,


List of battles of Rajasthan - Wikipedia

Several significant battles are recorded to have taken place in what is now known as Rajasthan.en.wikipedia.org
And Finally — —

Summary





There is no harm in being proud of your heritage and applauding your great warriors instead of singing the praises of foreign invaders. We would have not replied for your article if it wasn't so biased and included some more facts such as how the turk lutere Mughals and the British were more experienced warriors and their sole motto was to attacks and increase their territories. Rajputs, on the other hand, were rather peaceful rulers who were only contained with ruling and protecting their territories. And obviously they did not have access to better arms and ammunition.






Even if you survived like a sheep, you lost.


Even if you died like a lion, you won. Never leave your Dharma.








India is still a Hindu country because of these Rajput kings, and our rich heritage would otherwise been like that of Afghanistan or aboriginals in Australia. We have never understood this Indian mentality of considering foreigners superior. We are as proud as the Dutch or the Irish. It doesn't matter that we lost because we were not that good in war. What matters is that we had the courage to challenge foreign invaders and preserve our heritage.
We Rajputs Did Defeat-Arabs both Rashidun and Abbasid Caliphate, Ghori,Ghazni,Tughlaq(destroyed their power despite tughlaq had a 3 million strong army),The Sayyid,The Lodis(both Sikandar Lodhi and Ibrahim Lodhi),defeated Gujrat and Malwa Sultanate’s under the Khalji(not to be confused with Alauddin Khalji) And Finaly After a lot of Up’s and Down’s at one point their principle alies and key player in their politics but deprived of our prestige to finally Defeating Mughal’s(after aurenzeb,)Mewar alone Stopped Akbar invasion and for a long time Jahangir(Ofcourse not by loosing Constantly in a more than 5 Decade of continuous war)Gave a tough fight to Alauddin Khalji but eventually lost however the revolt continued…..the Marathas and British came at a point when after about more than 10 Centuries of Constant Battle Rajput’s were Exhausted It would be unfair to count them

If after reading this( point one percent we share ) makes us a community who had not won any war,then my friend you just wasted 20 minutes of life,Nothing can be done to stop critics like Girish Sahane and Ruchika Sharma whose influence has already littered Quora heavily with ‘Rajput Lost’ Shit,A message for my Rajput Brother’s and Sister’s focus on your studies and other important commitments of your life don’t get affected by such propaganda based articles this what they want it’s worthless doesn’t matter what they say IT IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE A PRIVILEGED TO BE BORN A RAJPUT…………..


And for those people who are jealous of Rajputs and abuse them, they will never know that in this history there comes a time when no rajput above 17 years of age is alive that is the epitome of bravery and sacrifice with which rajputs have fought for our great motherland but still in democracy time and again we have to tell evryone about such sacrifices which rajputs did for whole lot of millenia, seeing that much done by rajputs some time is depressing that for these two face lowlifes filled nation our ancestors and we happily sacrifice for, Kabhi padna veer rajputon ke baare mein tab pta lagega hum kaun thay
aese lakho veer hue hai Kshatriya dharam mein Jo desh per mar mite
Raja Harish chandra
Chakkarvarti samrat Vikramaditya
Samrat hemchandra vikramaditiye
Mahatama bhudh
Samrat lalitadiye
Samrat pouras Katoch
Samraat Dharampala
Samrat Devapala
Samrat Mihirbhoja
Maharaja bhoj
Raja JayaPala Shahi
AnandPala Shahi
Triclochanpala Shahi
Maharaja Vidhyadhar Chandel
Maharaja Bhoja Parmar
Bappa rawal
Rawal khuman
Rana Hameer Singh
Rana Lakha
Rana Kumbha
Hindpat Rana Sanga
Rana Amar Singh
Amar Singh Rathore
RajaChandrasen dor
Raja Bhupal singh
Veer Durga das Rathore
Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan
Maharaja Hameer Dev Chauhan
Maha rawal Ratan Singh
Maharaja Suheldev Bais
Maharana Pratap The Greatest
Hindupat Maharana Raj Singh
Banda Singh Bahadur manhas
Veer Bajjar Singh Rathore
Maharaja Ganga Singh Rathore
Maharaja Anandpal Tanwar
Chattrapati Shivaji maharaj
Chattrapati Sambhaji Maharaj
Maharaja Sansar chand katoch
Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana
Veer Veeram Dev Chauhan
Maharana udai Singh
Veer kunwar Singh
Veer khusaal Singh
Mahaveer Gora Badal
Rao Jaimal Rathore
Rawat Patta Chundawat
Thakur Bheem Singh Dodiya
Maharaja Bheem Dev solanki
Raja Harshvardhan
General Zorawar Singh
Maharaj bhoj
King Suhaldev bayas
Brave Jaymal Kalla Rathore
Maharaja Shakti Singh
Hameer Dev solanki
Ramdev ji
Paabu ji Rathore
Sant Pipa ji
Maharaja chattarsal bundela
Rani durgawati Chandel
Hada Rani
Rani Padmavati
Rani karmavati
Meera bai
Rani Avanti Bai Lodhi
Rani Jayakumari
Or na Jane kitne Rajput Desh per mar mite
Or
Rajput regiment
Rajputana rifles
Dogra regiment
Kamaon regiment
Gadwaal regiment
Sab rajputon ne apne veerta ke bal per banayi hai
World war me bhi rajputon ka hi Jalwa tha
Sabse jyada army generals or army officers bhi rajput
Or Han 7 paramveer chakkar or 8 Victoria cross jo Ki sirf rajputon ne jeete hai sabse jyada Rajput army mein hai desh ki paheli veergati pane wali mahila Rajput
Teeno Sena ke adhiyaksh BHI Rajput
Sabse jyada matrubhumi ke liye veergati pane wale soldiers BHI Rajput ,


Israel ke Haifa ko BHI Jodhpur lancers ke rajputon ne Azaad krwaya Major Dalpat Singh Shekhawat - Hero of Haifa
Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳
Jai hindu dharm
Or Han Rajput marte dum tak Desh or dharm ke liye jeeyega or marega No matter how much our countrymen abuse us..
Jai Hind🇮🇳
Jai Hindu dharm
Raja RamChandra Ki Jay
— -A PROUD RAJPUT

For Further Reading