Tuesday, March 20, 2018

RIDDLE OF THE LOST - IMMORTAL RAJPUTS


"He stood six feet six inches, and was bulky in proportion. His limbs rivalled those of the Hercules Farnese. His father was nearly seven feet, and died at the early age of twenty-two, in a vain attempt to keep down, by regimen and medicine, his enormous bulk."

The story starts with- Ambaji, who was this year nominated by Sindhia his viceroy in Hindustan, left Ganesh Pant as his lieutenant in Mewar, with whom acted the Rana’s officers, Sawai and Shirji Mehta; who applied themselves to make the most of their ephemeral power with so rapacious a spirit, that Ambaji was compelled to displace Ganesh Pant and appoint the celebrated Rae Chand. To him they would not yield, and each party formed a nucleus for disorder and misrule. It would be uninteresting and nauseating to the reader to carry him through all the scenes of villainy which gradually desolated this country; for whose spoil pilfering Mahrattas, savage Rohillas, and adventurous Franks were all let loose. The now humbled Chondawats, many of whose fiefs were confiscated, took to horse, and in conjunction with lawless Sindis scoured the country. Their estates were attacked, Kurabar was taken, and batteries were placed against Salumbar, whence the Sindis fled and found refuge in Deogarh. In this exigence, the Chondawats determined to send an envoy to Ambaji, who was then engaged in the siege of Datia; and Ajit Singh, since prominent in the intrigues of Mewar, was the organ of his clan on this occasion. For the sum of ten lakhs the avaricious Mahratta agreed to recall his deputy from Mewar, to renounce Sheodas and the Saktawats, and lend his support to the Chondawats. The Salumbar chief again took the lead at court, and with Agarji Mehta as minister, the Saktawats were attacked, the stipulated ten lakhs raised from their estates, and two fiefs of note, Hintha and Semari, confiscated.

Death of Mahādaji Sindhia, January 12, 1794.—The death of Mahadaji Sindhia, and the accession of his nephew Daulatrao, his murder of the Shenvi Brahmans, and his quarrels with the Bais (‘princesses,’ wives of the deceased Sindhia), all occurred at this time, and materially influenced the events in Mewar. The power of Ambaji as Subahdar of Hindustan was strengthened by the minority of Sindhia, although contested by Lakwa and the Bais, supported by the Khichi prince, Durjan Sal, and the Datia Raja, who fought and died for the princesses. Lakwa wrote to the Rana to throw off Ambaji’s yoke and expel his lieutenant; while Ambaji commanded his deputy to eject the Shenvi Brahmans, 525supporters of Lakwa, from all the lands in Mewar. To this end Ganesh Pant called on the Rana’s ministers and chiefs, who, consulting thereon, determined to play a deep game; and while they apparently acquiesced in the schemes of Ganesh, they wrote the Shenvis to advance from Jawad and attack him, promising them support. They met at Sawa; Nana was defeated with the loss of his guns, and retired on Chitor. With a feint of support, the Chondawats made him again call in his garrison and try another battle, which he also lost and fled to Hamirgarh; then, uniting with his enemies, they invested the place with 15,000 men. Nana bravely maintained himself, making many sallies, in one of which both the sons of Dhiraj Singh, the chief of Hamirgarh, were slain. Shortly after, Nana was relieved by some battalions of the new raised regulars sent by Ambaji under Gulab Rao Kadam, upon which he commenced his retreat on Ajmer. At Musamusi he was forced to action, and success had nearly crowned the efforts of the clans, when a horseman, endeavouring to secure a mare, calling out , "Bhagi! bhagi!" “She flies! she flies!” the word spread, while those who caught her, exclaiming "Milgayi! milgayi!" “She is taken!” but equally significant with ‘going over’ to the enemy, caused a general panic, and the Chondawats, on the verge of victory, disgraced themselves, broke and fled. Several were slain, among whom was the Sindi leader Chandan. Shahpura opened its gates to the fugitives led by the Goliath of the host, the chief of Deogarh.


 It was an occasion not to be lost by the bards of the rival clan, and many a ribald stanza records this day’s disgrace. Ambaji’s lieutenant, however, was so roughly handled that several chiefs redeemed their estates, and the Rana much of the fisc, from Mahratta control.

Saturday, March 17, 2018

BRAHMAGUPTA DISAPPROVING ARYABHATTA

Brahmagupta, great mathematician of his era was not merely a theorist rather his calculation was based on the observation with the help of instruments or nalikadi yantra which were available at that era. He was a proficient observer who use to observe, calculate and make correction on the basis of his observations. In his treatise Khandakhadyaka he has stressed the need of direct observation.


Brahmasphuta Siddhanta which means corrected treatise of Brahma contains lot of criticism on the work of other mathematicians especially ryabhata. He had many disagreements with Mathematician of that era and most of his chapters of Brahmasphuta Siddhanta deals with dodges in their treatise.

The Indian astronomy was a gift of Aryabhata work. He is said to be the teacher of two distinct astronomy system one is audayika and other one is ardharatrika system. In audayika the astronomical day begins with the sunrise at Lanka and in the ardharatrika it begins with midnight at Lanka. Brahmagupta had made use of astronomical constant of Aryabhata ardharatrika system for his calculation in the first part of Khandakhadyaka, but the methods involved in spherical geometry, calculation of eclipse etc. is just a reproduction of Brahmasphuta Siddhanta. So in short audayika and ardharatrika astronomical constants can be found in Aryabhat ya and may construed from Khandakhadyaka. In connection with this, some authorities had said that Brahmagupta tried to simplify the treatise of ryabhata i.e. Brahmagupta Khadakhadyaka is a simplified version of ryabhata’s ardharatrika and he was also successful in doing this. Brahmagupta in this relationship referred ryabhata in Khandakhadyaka in following ways:

After giving homage to lord Mahadeva, who is the great cause of this World formation, existence and devastation, I shall declare that Khandakhadyaka will yield the same results that of ryabhata treatise.

In Brahmasphuta Siddhanta Brahmagupta takes the astronomical day to begin with the sunrise at Lanka which was same that of ryabhata audayika system, He expresses his surprise as in one treatise ryabhata considers days begin with sunrise at Lanka and in other he considers day begin from midnight at Lanka which results in the difference of one-fourth of the motions. For calculations of days, months, years, yugas and kalpas he had taken first tithi of the month caitra i.e. caitra sukla pratipada and the first day considered is Sunday whereas ryabhata considers Guruvara i.e. Thursday as first day of Kalpa which is wrong according to Brahmagupta.

Brahmagupta differs in the calculation of length of the four yugas from ryabhata. According to Aryabhata all the yugas are of equal length i.e. 1,080,000 years and the caturyuga being of 4,320,000 years, whereas according to Brahmagupta all the four yugas of caturyuga or Mahayuga are not of same length: Kaliyuga is of 432,000 years, Dvapara is of 864,000 years i.e. twice of kali, Treta is of 1,296,000 years, i.e. thrice of kali and Krtayuga is of 1,728,000 years i.e. four times of kali, total comes to be 4,320,000 years but as per both the caturyuga had same length i.e. 4,320,000 years.

Brahmagupta had on one hand critizes Aryabhata works, on the other hand uses his works and expanded them further, which is confirmed by Iranian mathematician and astronomer Alberuni in his work in the early 11th century, Alberuni has defended Aryabhata and addresses Brahmagupta, He says that we shall not argue with Brahmagupta rather only whisper in his ear that why do you begin to calculate the diameter of moon to explain the eclipsing of sun and the diameter of the shadow of the earth to explain its eclipsing the moon after having spoken harsh words for them and why do you compute the above ecliptics on the basis of their theories and not according to them whom you think are proper to agree.

Brahmagupta has criticized Aryabhata in many places in some places without any proper justification, one such point is order of days. Planets motion decreases in following order: Chandra (Moon), Budha i.e. Mercury, Sukra (Venus), Surya (Sun), Kuja (Mars), Guru (Jupiter) and Sani (Saturn). ryabhata in one of his sutra says that starting with the Sun and continuing in increasing order every fourth is the lord of the day which gives the order as follows : Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Venus and Saturn and thus the order of the day on this basis is Ravivara-Sunday, candravara-Monday, Mangalavara-Tuesday, Budhavara-Wednesday, Guruvara-Thursday, Sukravara-Friday and Sanivara-Saturday. In other word Aryabhata has given the same order as given by other Mathematicians of that era then why he was criticized by him was not understood.

Second such point is the Motion of the Earth. According to ryabhata Earth is in motion and the Bhaganas are stationary, where Brahmagupta objected that if Earth is in motion then birds would not be able to return to their nest, the roof and hills

would come down which basically contradicts the observation because of this Brahmagupta is not justified in some places in the criticism of Aryabhata.

Brahmagupta assigns the longitude of the sun apogee to be 80° where as in Uttara-Khandakhadyaka, which is basically a corrected version of Khandakhadyaka, he corrected this longitude to 77° where the Aryabhata value was 78° which is less correct as compare to the modern calculation. The astronomical constant given by Conn. Des Temps, the longitude of Sun opogee in 499 A.D was 77°19′19.44′′ and 76°40 22′′ on the basis of Newcomb’s equation, these two values are almost similar to the value given in Uttara-Khandakhadyaka by Brahmagupta i.e. 77° which means Brahmagupta is more correct than ryabhata.

Brahmagupta noticed that ryabhata had made the Moon’s apogee fast and nodes slow than they actually are and in both the case he made over correction. The length of the anomalistic month given by Brahmagupta = 
days = 27.55454641 and Aryabhata value is 27.554602 but according to Radau the value is 27.5545502, here again Brahmagupta is more accurate. Coming to the length of the sidereal period of the moon apogee the Brahmagupta value is
days = 3232.732048 and the value given by Aryabhata is 3231.987844 days but the modern value calculated is 3232.3754 days which tells that Brahmagupta value is much closer to modern value sidereal period of the Moon apogee as compare to ryabhata. According to Brahmasphuta Siddhanta the approximate period of the sidereal revolution of the moon node is
 
days = 6792.25396 days and in Khandakhadyaka the value corrected by Brahmagupta is 6794.75083 days. Thus Brahmagupta was successful in attempt to correct the node faster.

Brahmagupta states that the longitude of mars aphelion should be increased by 17° and Jupiter by 10° and here also he was more exact as compare to ryabhata values. The sutra which states this is stated below:

Sutra: 8.1. Uttara Khandakhadyaka: IX-10.



Translation: The apogee of Mars is increased by 17°, Jupiter by 10°. Subtract 74’ with the sughra of Venus, Saturn’s equation of apsis is decreased by one-fifth and the sighra equation of mercury is increased by one sixteenth.

Sutra from Khandakhadyaka i.e. II.6 stated below gives the degrees of longitude of apogees of the planets beginning with Mars which are 11, 22, 16, 8 and 24, where each is multiplied by 10.

Sutra: 8.2. Khandakhadyaka: II-6.



According to above sutra Mars aphelion point which had longitude of 110° and the longitude of Jupiter aphelion was 160° which was corrected by Brahmagupta in the sutra of Uttara Khandakhadyaka -IX.10 which states that the longitude of Mars aphelion point was 127° and the longitude of Jupiter aphelion was 170° in 499 A.D. Whereas ryabhata has given 118° as longitude of Mars aphelion and 180° as longitude of Jupiter’s aphelion.

Newcomb’s rule and Conn. des. Temps rule gives the longitude of Mars aphelion in 499 A.D. as 128°28′12′′ and 128°27′51′′ respectively which states Brahmagupta determination of Mars aphelion is quite satisfactory, again when the longitude of Jupiter is calculated with these two rules it was 170°25′ hence here too Brahmagupta was more accurate.

Figure: 8.1. The apogees of the orbits of planets longitude.

In one of the verses Brahmagupta points out the differences in his and Aryabhata calculations in the pherpheries of the sighra and manda epicycles of

Planets in odd and even quadrants. This differences is illustrated in the table given below:

Table: 8.1. Peripheries of the Epicycles of the Planets.




Aryabhata and Bhaskara have both given the sutra for finding the drkksepajyas of the Sun and the Moon, where drkksepajya is the Rsine of the zenith distance of that point of the ecliptic that is at the shortest distance from the zenith this point is also called central ecliptic point. The rule says: find the product of the Sun/Moon own mahyajya and udayajya then divide it by the radius, square the hence obtained result and subtract this result with the square of madhyajya. The square root of this difference is drkksepajya of the Sun/Moon.

i.e drkksepajya = 


The above rule given by Aryabhata was approximate and has been criticized by Brahmagupta.

Even for finding the Rsine of the agra of the Sun and the Rsine of the Sun prime vertical altitude, the rule which is given in Golapada- Aryabhata ya sutra 30-31was criticized by Brahmagupta.

Sutra: 8.3. Aryabhatta: V-30-31.

Rule says that: find the product of the Sun Rsine of the greatest declination by the Rsine of the Sun true longitude then divide the resultant product with the Rsine of the colatitude, the result thus obtained is the Rsine of the agra of Sun. Now when the agra of the Sun is less than the latitude and Sun is in the northern hemisphere multiply the Sun Rsine of agra with the Rsine of the colatitude the result thus obtained is the Sun’s prime vertical altitude. The error which was created by Aryabhata was that the sun’s agra should be less than the latitude was noticed by Brahmagupta, however Bhaskara corrected this error in his Laghu Bhaskariya according to which Sun’s agra should be not less than latitude rather the Rsine of the Sun northern declination is less than the latitude, this condition is necessary for the prime vertical shadow of the gnomon.

Brahmagupta has also criticized the calculation of determining lambana i.e. the difference of the parallaxes in longitude of Sun and the Moon and the rule for finding avanati or nati i.e. the differences in the parallaxes in latitude of the Sun and the Moon.

Lambana was obtained with the help of the five Rsine values i.e. madhyajya, udayajya, drkksepajya, drgjya and drggatijya.

◆Madhyajya-the Rsine of the zenith distance of meridian ecliptic point=Rsin(∅ +_ declination of meridian ecliptic point ) where ∅ is the place latitude and R is the radius of the celestial sphere.

◆Udayajya-the Rsine of the arc of the horizon intervening between the equator and the ecliptic=
where L is the longitude of the horizon east

ecliptic point, ∅ is the place latitude, R is the radius of the celestial sphere and H is the obliquity of the ecliptic.



Drgjya-the Rsine of the zenith distance of the Sun =

where R is the radius of the celestial sphere, L is the longitude of the horizon east ecliptic point and M is the longitude of the sun.
Drggatijya-the Rsine of the altitude of the central ecliptic point=

where R is the radius of the celestial sphere.

Lambana is the difference between the parallaxes in longitude of the Sun and the

Moon and is given by Aryabhata with the help of following expression:

Lambana = Moon’s lambana – Sun’s lambana.

Where Moon's lambana =


Sun’s lambana = 


Note: Lambana are in terms of minutes of the arc.

Lambana is also expressed in following ways:



Nati or the avanati both terms mean same, is the difference of the parallaxes in the latitude of the Sun and the Moon is given by ryabhata in following ways:

Nati=

  minutes. Aryabhata has given this expressions in the following sutra:

Sutra: 8.4. Aryabhatiya: IV-33-34.


Where Brahmagupta has used following expression for lambana and nati which inturn gives accurate values:

Lambana=ghatis, where R is the radius of celestial sphere, m is the longitudes of the meridian ecliptic and \ is the longitude of the Sun.

Nati=

 where R is the radius of celestial sphere and ∆ is the difference between the daily motions of the Sun and the Moon.

Brahmagupta had criticized the ryabhata system of calculation with respect to Lambana i.e. the differences of the parallaxes in longitude, of the Sun and the Moon, drkksena i.e. the Rsine of the zenith distance of the central ecliptic point, srngonnati i.e. elevation of Moon horns and many more points. He opposed ryabhata so intensely that in the end he declares in one of his sutra-Brahmasphuta Siddhanta XI.44 that it is beyond his capability to enumerate all the defects made by ryabhata. Only few of his defects were illustrated here and other defects can be easily traced by intelligent people. Sutra for the same is listed below:

Sutra: 8.5. Brahmasphuta: XI-44.


In one of the other sutra i.e. Brahmasphuta SiddhantaXI.43 Brahmagupta states that ryabhata is neither knowledgeable with the ganita (Mathematics) nor kala i.e. time calculation nor Gola i.e. spherical calculation. Further he adds that it is difficult to enumerate separately the mistakes committed by him in connection with the chapters of the ganitapada, kalakriyapada and golapada.

Sutra: 8.6. Brahmasphuta: XI-43.


ryabhata and Brahmagupta both are scholars of 5th and 6th century respectively have done in-depth works in the fields of Astrology, Astronomy and Math. Brahmagupta while completing his works had lots of disagreement with ryabhata works and has bought it out in his treatise.

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

HINDU SHAHI LAST KING PRINCE PURUJAYAPALA TRILOCHANPALDEVA - IMMORTAL RAJPUTS


Prince Trilochanpála, the son of Anandapala, ascended the imperial throne in about AD 1011. Inheriting a reduced kingdom, he immediately set about expanding his kingdom into the Sivalik Hills, the domain of the Rai of Sharwa. His kingdom now extended from the River Indus to the upper Ganges valley. According to Al-Biruni, Tirlochanpála "was well inclined towards the Muslims (Ghaznavids)" and was honourable in his loyalty to his father's peace treaty to the Ghaznavids. He eventually rebelled against Sultan Mahmud and was later assassinated by some of his own mutinous troops in AD 1021–22, an assassination which was believed to have been instigated by the Rai of Sharwa who became his arch-enemy due to Tirlochanpala's expansion into the Siwalik ranges. He was romanticised in Punjabi folklore as the Last Punjabi ruler of Punjab.

Trilochanapala ascended the Shahi throne after the death of his father Anandapala. Though more famous as the Kings of Lahore, the temple fort at Nandana, fourteen miles south-west of Choha Saidan Shah (near Katas Raj), situated on a remarkable dip of the outer salt range, had been a stronghold of the Vaid dynasty ruling Punjab. Lying midway between Lahore and Waihind, it must have served as the national capital of the Shahis after loss of Waihind. Ensconced in the mountain of Balanath, it had a strong fort and was strategically located not too far from the commercial town of Bhera and the river Jhelum.

Peace treaties between states are means of achieving national aims without resorting to war. Sultan Mahmud must have realised that the Shahis were not very pliable. He would not feel safe about his rear if he advanced deep into India beyond the territory controlled by the Shahis. So he decided to first attack the Shahi capital at Nandana and crush Trilochanapala. Mahmud collected a large army in the spring of 1014 and marched toward Nandana. When Trilochanapala became aware of the intentions of the Turk, he entrusted the defence of Nandana to his son Bhimapala – whom Utbi refers as Niddar Bhima (the fearless Bhima). The Shahis summoned their vassals and meanwhile Bhimapala advanced with his forces to take position behind the wings of a hill pass – probably Marigala Pass near Rawal Pindi. He positioned his elephants in the entrance of the narrow and precipitous pass while his forces occupied the hills on both sides. He thus waited in security while reinforcements kept arriving. Mahmud found himself outmanoeuvred and his spearmen failed to provoke the Hindus. “When his vassals had joined Bhimapala he left his entrenchments and came out into the plain, having the hills behind him and elephants drawn up on each wing. The battle raged furiously.” A general leading the Turkish vanguard was wounded grievously and Mahmud dispatched part of his own guards to extricate his commander. The conflict continued as before but the Turks were victorious at the end. Bhimapala survived the battle and escaped, entrusting the defence of their fort at Nandana to some of their devoted veterans. Mahmud advanced promptly to invest the fort. There was stiff resistance and Mahmud asked his sappers to lay mines under the walls, while the Turkish archers poured arrows into the fort. Finally the garrison surrendered. He next led is forces towards Kashmir to chase and destroy the Shahi King.

Meanwhile Trilochanapala had gone towards Kashmir along with some of his forces, to seek assistance from Sangramaraja, the ruler of Kashmir (1003–1028), who consented to help. Tunga, the commander of Kashmir forces, was sent at the head of a contingent consisting of several nobles, feudal chiefs and other ranks. From previous experience of battles with the Turks, Trilochanapala had devised a strategy quite similar to that followed by Bhimapala of blocking the advance of large Turkish army from behind a hill pass and later fighting on a restricted battlefield in the backdrop of these hills. He had advised Tunga accordingly. However, in his impetuosity Tunga came out in hasty moves. Mahmud found an opportunity to strike with full force and Tunga’s army dispersed. Trilochanapala tried to control the situation but was unsuccessful. Having routed the Hindu forces, Mahmud plundered the area, took many prisoners and converted much of the populace to Islam. Rajatarangini, a history of Kashmir, also gives a detailed account of this particular battle because forces of Kashmir state were involved in it.

This was a severe blow which almost destroyed the Shahis as a strong reigning power. But they were not yet completely wiped out. Mahmud was still not confident of advancing deep into India with the bruised and mauled Shahis in his rear. He organised some probing campaigns to test political waters.

Plunder of Thanesar

Mahmud had gathered information that Thanesar had an idol Jugsoma (Chakraswamin) and the place was as holy in the eyes of Hindus as Mecca to Muslims. It was another potential Nagarkot and Mahmud organised a quick foray. Thanesar was under the jurisdiction of the Delhi Kingdom. Ferishta states that the Shahi ruler tried to dissuade Mahmud from his resolution in exchange for an annual tribute but it did not work. The Shahi warned Bijayapala, the Towar Raja of Delhi, about the impending danger but the Hindus were too slow in organising a joint defence. A Raja named Ram, probably the ruler of Thanesar, came out to stop the Turkish force, but lost. Mahmud continued his march to Thanesar, plundered the city and destroyed a large number of idols. The chief idol was carried to Ghazni for defilement.

Unsuccessful siege of Lohkot

In an effort to destroy the Shahi vestige and enter Kashmir, Mahmud besieged the fort of Lohkot in 1015 CE. Lohkot was remarkable on account of its height and strength. Mahmud failed to subdue this fort or get past it and enter Kashmir. According to Ferishta, Mahmud returned to Ghazni with great difficulty “having failed in all the enterprises of this campaign.”

Expedition to Kannauj

With Punjab subdued, time was ripe for Sultan Mahmud to organise a campaign for plundering the famed riches of temples and kingdoms of mid-India. In 1018 CE he fitted a large army of 100,000 chosen horse and 20,000 foot and marched towards India. In a long journey he crossed all the rivers of Punjab and put his forces across the Yamuna by 2 December 1018. Trilochanapala who was still ruling eastern Punjab refused to pay allegiance and sheltered himself in the Parmar kingdom of Malwa.

Mahmud destroyed several big and small kingdoms: Baran (modern Bulandshahr), Mahaban, Mathura, Kannauj, Munj, Asi and Sharva. There was a varying degree of resistance or lack of it. For example, at Munj known as “the fort of Brahmanas” the garrison resisted the invader for 25 days and died fighting heroically literally to the last man and not a single soul survived in the fort. Kannauj, the Imperial capital of India was then ruled by Gurjara Prathara Rajyapala. After the outlying forts were reduced, Rajyapala left Kannauj to wait for another day. Mahmud’s share of the plunder from this campaign consisted of two crore dirhams of gold and silver bullion, 5300 captives, 350 elephants, besides jewels pearls and other precious effects. Nor was the spoil of the army less than which came into the public treasury.

The last Shahi effort to turn the tide

The Chandel of Kalanjar had formed a confederacy of some Hindu states and they killed Rajyapala of Kannauj for his cowardly submission to Mahmud. Still hoping to turn the tide and regain his kingdom, Trilochanapala Shahi had also joined the confederacy. The Chandella ruler had promised to bring an army to Punjab but procrastinated. So Trilochanapala marched with his forces to join the Chandella for a joint front against the Turks. In 1019 CE Mahmud set out from Ghazni “with an army greater than any which he had hitherto led into India” pre-empting moves regarding joining of the Shahi and Chandella forces. “Mahmud traversed stages after stages and overtook Purujayapala (Trilochanapala) and his forces on the 14th of Saban: between him and the Hindus was a deep river.” Trilochanapala determined to resist the passage of Sultan. Mahmud hesitated to attempt the crossing of the turbulent and muddy river. One night however eight Muslim officers, each followed by his troops, crossed the river apparently without the King’s knowledge. Entering the camp early morning by surprise, when Hindu soldiers were not yet through from their routine morning ablutions, they struck panic among the enemy ranks. The Shahi was worsted in this sudden encounter and escaped. “Two hundred and eighty eight gigantic elephants fell into the hands of the Mussalamans” among other booty. HTrilochanapala made another attempt to join up with Vidyadhar Chandella for the next decisive battle. But history has no record of him from this point. According to Tarikh ul-Kamil, Trilochanapala was wounded after fighting for greater part of the day. He may not have survived the forced march towards Kalanjar.

Confrontation with Chandelas

Vidyadhar Chandel had fielded 36,000 cavalry, 124,000 infantry and 640 elephants at the border of his kingdom. “Sultan reconnoitred the opposing army from an eminence and observing the vast numbers he regretted having come thither. Prostrating before God, he prayed for success and victory.” The engagement was probably indecisive and Vidyadhar retreated during the night possibly with the horses and elephants that could be retrieved. Sultan ordered the camp to be looted and did not advance further into Chandella territory. “Mahmud who was apprehensive of the disturbances in the Punjab, returned content with this victory to Ghazni.”

The exemplary resolve displayed by the Shahis was conspicuously absent amongst most of their fellow kings. (John Keay) One cannot but speculate what would have been the outcome of this engagement if the intrepid Trilochanapala, who had a steely determination and experience of battling the Turks, been in command of the ample forces of Vidyadhar Chandella on that fateful day. Al Beruni, who came to India in the train of Mahmud Ghaznavi and was a contemporary of these Hindu Shahis, paid a touching tribute:-
This Hindu Shahiya dynasty is now extinct, and of the whole there is no longer the slightest remnant in existence. We must say that in all their grandeur, they never slackened in the ardent desire of doing that which is good and right, that they were men of noble sentiment and noble bearing.

Never forget your Roots

Hindu temples at Kushab, Pakistan now called as Amba Sharif. These 6 story temples were last maintained by Hindu Shahi kings who ruled from Kabul. Still standing, after facing a 1000yrs of desecration. The temple is decorated with Kashmiri style motifs.


Indus river temples located in Dera Ismail Khan District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, near the cities of Mianwali and kundian in Punjab , Pakistan 


These temples are built by Great Hindu Sahis Rajputs, In local this place is called Kafirkot, 
There are actually two ruins called Kafirkot at a distance of around 50 kms from each other but similar locations , one is called the Bilot Kafirkot and the other Tilot Kafirkot.


Both the Temple Complexes are surrounded by ruins of Fortifications of what once would have been an impressive Fort watching over the Indus.


The temples of Bilot (and Tilot as well), among a chain of temples that stretch from Nandna on the eastern extremity of the Salt Range right though the hills to the Indus, 


are collectively known as the Hindu Shahi temples 


There are supposed to be 8 Temples Complexes built by the Hindu Shahi Rulers till the time the Dynasty fell in the 11th Century.




The remaining five are also damaged..


this temples tell the glorious history of Greatest of Greatest HinduSahi Rajputs. 




Thursday, March 1, 2018

CITY OF LAKES UDAIPUR - IMMORTAL RAJPUTS



Rajputana (Rajasthan), though synonymous with the Thar desert, springs this surprise with the ‘city of lakes’ whose micro-history of water resources is as significant and unique as its built architecture.


“It’s a unique example of water conservation and management anywhere in the world,”

The micro-history of water resource management in Mewar is filled with fascinating dots, which are waiting to be joined together which reveals deeper insights into watershed management, river diversion and river linkage in the region of Mewar over the last 700 years. “Udaipur the ‘city of lakes’ is actually a network of eight man-made lakes which have given the city its character and sustainability,” 

Dr Rathore explains in his paper on ‘Water Resource Management: 


A study of the world’s first man-made river links, river diversion and micro watershed of Udaipur basin’ lists the eight linkages: 

Goverdhan Sagar to Lake Pichola;

Lake Pichola is linked to Doodh Talai,

Amarkund and Kumharia Talab with channels;

Kumharia Talab is linked to Rang Sagar;

Rang Sagar, in turn, has link channels to Amar Kund and Swaroop Sagar;

it is Swaroop Sagar that overflows into the Fateh Sagar through the eighth link channel.

The story begins with Maharana Lakha who, in today’s terminology, was instrumental in watershed area planning. Between 1382-1385, Lake Pichola was constructed across the Kotra or Sisarma river. It has a total water body area of almost 7 sq. km. 

“It is the creation of a natural asset,” 


“the city of Udaipur gets defined by Lake Pichola and successive generations of Maharanas of Mewar provide more lakes, in fact more lifelines for the city from the 14th to 20th centuries.”

The expertise demonstrated in the construction of Lake Pichola as a water body in the 14th CE is in sync with scientific and technological developments at the zinc mines of Zawar, as detailed in Dr Paul T Craddock’s report titled ‘The production of lead, silver and zinc in ancient India’. A good working knowledge of hydrology, pneumatics, hydrostatics, geology and competence in mathematics would have been essential for these achievements.

Following the example of Maharana Lakha, the network of lakes was constructed which, as Dr Rathore said, can best be understood as micro watershed units.


Geography has played an important role in these micro-historical feats in Udaipur and the region of Mewar. Udaipur basin is located on the ‘great India water divide line’ at the confluence of four rivers, i.e., Ahar, Morwani, Amarjok and Kotra (Sisarma) that flow through the well-defined Girwa region along eastern slopes of south-central Aravallis, one of the oldest mountain ranges in the world.

Girwa means ‘girdle of hills’ and the Udaipur basin is saucer-shaped in the form of a valley, surrounded by Aravalli hill ranges.

“Metamorphic rocks of the region ensure that there is no underground leakage or seepage of water from these lakes,”

Ahar is the only major river that flows through this region, originating from the hills of Gogunda, flowing for 30 kms and joining Udai Sagar lake in the east.


Lake Pichola is an artificial lake located in theUdaipur city center of the state of Rajasthan. Lake Pichola is one of the largest and oldest lakes in the Udaipur city. Lake Pichola or pichola lake attracts millions of tourists visiting here due to its peace and beauty.


Surrounded by lofty hills, heritage buildings and bathing ghats, this place is a haven for peace and nature lovers. If going for a walk, then the trip to this lake is incomplete without a boat ride here.


Boating here during the evening can prove to be very special because at this time it seems as if the whole place is immersed in golden color.


A breathtaking view here will take you to a different world and make you romantic. Apart from your family, you can also travel with your friends in this beautiful place.



The word Pichola means ‘backyard’ and the lake was named after a nearby village ‘Picholi’. Pichola Lake was built in 1362 AD by Picchu Banjara during the reign of Maharana Lakha, which is 3 miles in length, width 2 miles, and depth 30 feet. Maharana Udai Singh was fascinated by the beauty of this lake, so he built the city of Udaipur on the banks of Lake Pichola. Later, being fascinated by the attraction of this lake, Maharana Udai Singh enlarged this lake and also built a dam on its banks.


The surroundings of the lake include palaces, marble temples, Havelis, platforms or bathing ghats that were built many centuries ago. Some of the famous palaces near this lake are Jag Niwas, Mohan Mandir, and Jag Mandir Mahal.


Jag Niwas has now been converted into a heritage hotel, which is situated on the Jagadweep. The Mohan Temple is located to the north-east of the lake, which was built between 1628 and 1652 by Jagat Singh. There is also an Arshevilleas island which was built by the Maharaja of Udaipur to enjoy the sunset. The lake also has a sanctuary for birds.

Lake Palace Udaipur




Lake Palace Udaipur was built between1743 AD to 1746AD under the leadership of 62nd Maharana Jagat Singh II of Udaipur. It was earlier called Jag Niwas after the name of its founder Jagat Singh. It was first constructed as a royal summer residence.


This palace was built in the east due to the worship of the Hindu god Suryadev by the residents of here.Located in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan state, Lake Palace is one of the important tourist destinations of Udaipur. This is also known as Jag Niwas.


Lake Palace is a grand hotel built on the Jag Niwas island of Pichola Lake. The Lake Palace has 83 rooms and suites made of white marble walls. Speed ​​boats are used to transport guests to the Lake Palace Hotel. Lake Palace is counted among the most romantic hotels in India and the world.
History of Lake Palace Udaipur Rajasthan


The rooms above are curved, which is 21feet in diameter. Its floor is made of black and white marble and the walls are adorned with adorned studded stones.


In the revolution of 1857, many European families fled Neemuch and came here, which was given shelter by the then Maharana Swaroop Singh. To save his guests, all the boats coming to this palace were destroyed so that the rebel could not reach this island.


An additional pavilion, Chandra Prakash was built here in Maharana Bhupal Singh’s Shashaan, the rest of the Jag Niwas was never changed. Bhagwant Singh decided to make Jag Niwas Jag Niwas the first luxury hotel in Udaipur.


An American artist designed this hotel. In1971, the Taj Group took over the management of this hotel and got 75rooms built. In 2000, it was repaired a second time.
Lake Palace was used for the filming of many films. In which The film The Tiger of Eschnapur and The Indian Tomb was shot in 1959. In 1983, an excerpt from James Bond’s film Octopussy was filmed at the Jal Mahal. In 1984 the British TV series The Jewel in the Crown was filmed as the guest house of the Nawab of Mirat. In 2001, for the first time in Jal Mahal, the Bollywood film Subhash Ghai-directed “Yade” was shot in which Hrithik Roshan and Kareena Kapoor were the main actors. Also Shooting the film The Fall in 2006. In 2013, excerpts from the movie “Yeh Jawani Hai Deewani” were screened. 


Jaisamand Lake


Jaisamand Lake or Dhebar Lake is a huge reservoir located in Udaipur in the southeast of the Aravali range of Rajasthan state of India. It is located on the Udaipur-Salumbar road, south-east, 51 km away from Udaipur District headquarters.

With its natural surroundings and the beauty of the dam’s architecture, this lake has become an important tourist attraction for years. The best time to visit here is at the time of monsoon.

The houses made with Ken on the road along the lake offer a very panoramic view. This is the most beautiful view of the lake.

“Jaisamand Lake is one of the main tourist destinations of Rajasthan and this lake have the distinction of being Asia’s largest artificial lake.”

The construction of the Jaisamand Lake was done by the Maharana of Udaipur for a picnic in 1687-1691. They also built an island in the middle of this lake.


महाराणा जय सिंह का तुला दान, जयसमंद के निर्माण, वर्ष 1678 के समय।  Maharana Jai Singh of Mewar tuladan ceremony, Tod collection, Royal Asiatic Society. Weighed against gold bullion, assisted by the purohit and queens, steadying hands on the scales


This artificial Lake, which was constructed between 1687 and 1691 AD by the then Maharana Jayasingh of Udaipur 14 thousand 400 meters in length and 9,500 meters wide, is considered as the largest freshwater lake in Asia.

In between the two hills, Dhebar Pass was given the form of an artificial lake and after the name of Maharana Jayasingh, it was called ‘Jaysamand’.

It is said that some years ago, there were nine rivers and more than half a dozen streams of water coming in this lake, but now only the Gomti river and its tributaries and some streams of water do reach.

Architecture of Jaisamand Lake Udaipur


The sight of architecture The Jaisamand Lake is a major center of attraction in itself. Six beautiful umbrellas built at some distance on the banks of the lake attract visitors. In front of these umbrellas, three Bediyo were made in front of them.

The statue of the stone has been made in the vertical posture of the six elephants, on top of the Bediyo. Here, the artistic temple of ‘Narmandhatar Mahadev’, which is dedicated to Lord Shiva by Maharana Jai ​​Singh has also been built at the highest point of the dam.

At the northern end of Asia’s largest artificial Lake dam is the palace built by Maharana Fateh Singh, which has now been transformed into a rest house. The palaces built on the southern end were called “the palaces of Maharaj Kumar”.

The palace built by Maharana Jai ​​Singh on the hill of the south end was restored at the time of Maharana Sajjan Singh. He built the ‘Jaynagar’ behind this lake and constructed some buildings and Baudi, which could not be inhabited. Today there are only some remains of construction.

According to historical documents, Maharana Jay Singh constructed 375 meters long and 35-meter high dam on Gomti river that brought water to the lake. The task of building it, two Purabi Chauhan Rajput wakhta and Galaling were given to.

The width of the wall in the Lake is 20 meters and the breadth above five meters. Construction of the dam was constructed from the white stones of the quarries of Baroda village located in Salumbankar, from the mine to the lake, the stones were used for lanes. The dual wall was constructed in terms of the strength of the lake.


From the point of view of safety, 396 meters long and a further The 36-meter high dam was constructed at a distance of about 100 feet from the dam. In the time of Maharana Sajjan Singh and Fahsinh, the portion between these two dams were filled and plantation was done on flat land.


Fateh Sagar Lake



Fateh Sagar Lake, located to the northwest of Udaipur in Rajasthan, is an important tourist destination of Udaipur. It is the second-largest man-made lake in Udaipur surrounded by the Aravalli hills. This lake is known for its grand beauty, the tranquil atmosphere of Fateh Sagar Lake makes tourists feel wonderful peace.

Fateh Sagar Lake is one of the major lakes of the city due to a large number of tourists visiting it. People come to this place to enjoy boating in the blue water and see the natural beauty of the place. The natural beauty and charm of Lake Fateh Sagar have made it a special tourist destination.



The Lake Fateh Sagar was built in 1687by Maharana Jai ​​Singh. But almost 200years later, this lake was destroyed in the floods in 1888, which was rebuilt by Maharana Fateh Singh in 1889 to shape the present lake by building Connaught Dam.

Because of which the lake was named Lake Fateh Sagar after Maharana Fateh Singh. Fateh-Sagar Lake is divided into three different islands. The largest island of which is called Nehru Park. A boat-shaped restaurant and a small zoo for children are also located at this place which is quite popular as a picnic spot.

The second island of this lake has a public park with water-jet fountains. Udaipur Solar Observatory is located on the third island. Fateh Sagar is famous for boating in the lake.


MONSOON PALACE | SAJJANGARH PALACE


Monsoon Palace located in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan state which is also known as Sajjangarh Palace or Sajjangarh Fort. The monsoon palace is situated on the Bansadara peak of the Aravalli hill, about 5 kilometers from Udaipur. Which is 3100 feet above sea level. And Udaipur city does not have any building higher than palace Monsoon.


The construction of the Palace Monsoon was started by Raja Sajjan Singh of Mewar in 1884. But with the untimely death of Sajjan Singh, the construction of the palace stopped. After which his successor Maharana Fateh Singh completed the construction of the palace.


Maharana Sajjan Singh, the builder of the Monsoon Palace, was the 72nd ruler of the Mewar dynasty. Who ruled Udaipur for about 10 years. Maharaja Sajjan Singh was installed on the throne at a very young age.

The purpose of the construction of this palace was specially built to see the monsoon clouds and estimate the rain and to employ local people. And it was also an important palace in terms of security. And from the very beginning, this palace has been popular as the best place for hunting in the royal family of Mewar.


This beautiful palace is built of white marble. From the Palace Monsoon, one can see Pichola Lake, Fatehsagar Lake in the heart of the city and the surrounding village areas and the Aravalli hills.

Several feet high pillars built in the palace are designed with floral motifs and leaves. And on its domes are Mewari paintings, this nine-story building served as an astronomical center. It is a wonderful palatial building of Udaipur.



The palace also has a water pool for the same period. Designed to collect every single drop of rain, which was designed to collect rainwater, the rainwater collection system is a wonderful example of the craftsmanship of ancient building artisans.

The rainwater falling in the open part of the fort is collected from the roof over the roof in the double pit by a pipe, which is used in the works of the fort throughout the year.The Palace Monsoon in Udaipur is built at the highest altitude. Due to which the first drops of rainfall on the monsoon palace itself. In such a situation, the royal family used to visit the Monsoon Palace to enjoy the monsoon.

The construction of Connaught Dam in 1890 assumes significance when known how highly erratic and uncertain is the rainfall every year.

“Explosive population growth, encroachment of lake-beds and rapid urbanisation have compounded the problems that a heritage city like Udaipur faces, year after year,”

Measures to save lakes need to be taken through water conservation techniques and construction of new link channels. In short, lessons from our past have to be learnt, saluting leadvers whose names are linked to water bodies that have sustained cities, lives and livelihoods for centuries.

So residents-tourists to the heritage city, lakes filled to the brim are thrilling sights to remember.

City Palace Udaipur


Udaipur, earlier the capital of the Mewar Kingdom, is today one of the world's beautiful cities. Known as 'City of Lakes', this pristine & elegant city has many lakes that offer visitors panoramic views of waters against a glorious setting sun.


The construction of City Palace started under the reign of  Maharana Udai Singh II (SisodiaRajput) and was enhanced subsequently by his successors over a period of 400 years. 


The kingdom of Mewar was situated in what is now Rajasthan in Northern India. It was bestowed on Bappa Rawal in 734 A.D. by the great devotee of Lord Shiva (Shri Eklingji), Sage Harit Rashi of the Lakulish Cult.


As the armies of the Mughal emperor Akbar moved to occupy Mewar in 1568, the then ruler, Maharana Udai Singh, father of Rana Pratap Singh, retired to safety at Udaipur, in the foothills of the Aravalli Range. It was at Udaipur that Pratap supplanted his father as head of the Sesodia clan. Rana Pratap's son Amar Singh was resident at the time of his father's death in exile. Udaipur remained the capital of the state until it acceded unto the Union of India in 1947.

Immediately after Rana Pratap's death, the Sisodias became vassals of the Mughals, and served them faithfully for nearly two centuries. When the Mughal empire went into terminal decline in the 18th century, the Sisodias ventured a measure of autonomy, but were subdued by the Marathas, who exacted crippling tributes from them annually. To add to the woes of the land, the Sisodia rulers of this period dissipated much energy and resources in petty quarrels with their neighbours. As the relentless turmoil drained both the country and its ruling family; in the early decades of the 19th century, the Sisodia rulers repeatedly petitioned the British Raj for protection from their neighbours and from the Marathas. Finally, in 1818, Mewar entered into subsidiary alliance with the British and became a Princely state in the Rajputana Agency. This arrangement continued until the independence of India in 1947, when Mewar acceded unto the Union of India; it was later integrated into the Indian state of Rajasthan.


In the heraldry of Mewar the sun plays a major role as the emblem of the empire, the emblem of the kingdom and the emblem of the Maharana. In the 19th century the faced sun came to refer to the Hindu sun-god Surya from which the Royal House of Mewar, belonging to the Rajput Suryavanshi lineage, claimed its descent.

The picture in the head of this section shows the national emblem of the Mughal Empire consisting of a sun surrounded by twenty-four stars. This emblem was granted to the main vassals of the Empire. Such a screen is part of the royal insignia in the 12th century Sangrahani Sutra manuscript. It is depicted on a miniature showing the Maharajas of Jodhpur and Jaipur and the Maharana of Mewar received by Emperor Shah Alam in 1708. It is carried on a pole by the ensigns of these rulers.



Soon there were embellished versions of this emblem as we may see on this detail of “Maharana Sangram Singh on his Royal Mount, Jambudvipa” (1725 ca.). On this miniature we can see that the screen consisted of black ostrich-feathers.

In the beginning of the 19th century this emblem evoluated by adding a face to the sun and by leaving out the stars. On a picture of 1851 an umbrella is added. A modern version shows the sun flamboyant.






The screen in 1802, 1851 and today



The Sun

Once the faced sun was introduced, it became the emblem of the Maharana. Its design evolutaed from a sun radiant or flamboyant charged with a simple head, to a sun charged with the head of the sun god Surya from which the Royal House traced its descent. As such, this head or face is symbolizing each ruler of Mewar. It also distiguishes the Mewar sun from for example the sun of Jaipur and some other Indian Princely states.




Evolution of the Sun radiant of Mewar, 1860 - ’90 ca.


The Fans and Banners

The faced sun was placed on the fans and standards. Of these two sets have been preserved. The oldest set consists of a sun-banner, a moon-banner and a fan.





Generally speaking the banners are the symbols of the ruler and of the state, the moon without the face implying that the ruler was not the head of state, and thus, that the government of Mewar was an autonomous body. This would be the case whenever the ruler was not able to govern and the state affairs were looked after by a regency. This would also be the case in a constitutional monarchy.

Another set consists of two fans and a sun-banner:


This set was still used in the interbellum.



The Royal Achievement

A quasi-achievement was in the audience hall (Mor Chowk or Peacock Hall) of the palace of Udaipur, itself built by Rana Karan Singhji (1620-’28). It showed the imperial emblem of the sun radiant, supported by female servants bearing a tray with offerings.

After Mewar had resigned from the Mughal Empire in 1818, this emblem was defaced by painting the sun-disc black. This, at least, can be seen on this picture of Bhim Singh receiving Charles Metcalfe in the Mor Chowk in 1826.

Somewhat later, maybe by Sajjan Singh, the emblem was repainted. It shows a sun radiant now, charged with the head of the sun god Surya in full color. This version can be seen on a picture of Fateh Singh receiving a British diplomat in 1890. It seems to have been the model after which the achievement of 1877 was designed by Robert Taylor. For the occasion the female servants were replaced by a Bhil and a Rajput warrior.

When the Durbar Hall was begun and decorated in 1909 the sun and servants were redesigned again. The number of servants was augmented to four and the trays in their hands were replaced by morchals and chaoris. The rays of the sun were made of mirrors and the head of Surya was made of gold. Above the head there is an umbrella and two hovering angels.


Bhim Singh receiving Charles Metcalfe, 1826 (detail).


Fateh Singh receiving a diplomat, 1890 (detail)


Sajjan Singh 

1874-1884

Maharana Sajjan Singh was granted an achievement western style in 1877:



Arms: Gules, a sun in splendour Or charged with a kings-head proper.

Crest: On a helmet guardant, lambrequined Gules and Or, a sword erect.

Supporters: A Bhil and a Rajput warrior attired for forlorn hope proper.

Motto: JO DRDH RAKHE DHARMA KAU TIHI RAKHE KUTAR.


Bhils are a tribal group in Central India. In feudal and colonial times, many Bhils were employed by the ruling Rajputs in various capacities, e.g. as Shikaris because of their knowledge of the terrain. Many had even become warriors in armies. They were in the Mewar army of Rana Pratap Singh (1572-’96) at the battle of Haldighati (1576), and were experts in guerilla warfare which the Mughals had so much trouble handling. Today, there is a Mewar Bhil Corps.



The Rajput warriors enjoyed a reputation as valuable soldiers for centuries. From them several lineages sprang up which played a major role in Rajputana. The Rajput warrior in this achievement has the sun radiant as a crest on his helmet, referring to the Suryavanshi lineage, claiming descent from Surya, the solar deity. The House of Mewar belonged to this lineage.


Fateh Singh 

1884-1929

Soon after its adoption in 1877 the achievement was changed to fit better Hindu culture:




Arms: Or, a sun in splendour Or, charged with a kings head proper.

Crest: A linga and yoni and a sword erect proper.

Supporters: A Bhil and a Rajput warrior attired for forlorn hope proper.

Compartment: A grassy ground.

Motto: JO DRDH RAKHE DHARMA KAU TIHI RAKHE KUTAR.


The Linga and Yoni is one of the most common objects of worship in Hinduism, wether in the temple or in the household cult. It consists of the erect male organ Linga, rising from the female counterpart Yoni, as the base.



The National Achievement

The national achievement dates from the reign of Maharana Shambhu Singhji (1861-‘74).






Arms: A landscape showing fort Chittorgarh, proper.

Crest: The sun radiant charged with the head of Surja proper.

Supporters: A Bhil and a Rajput warrior attired for forlorn hope proper.

Motto: JO DRDH RAKHE DHARMA KAU TIHI RAKHE KUTAR. (The Almighty protects those who stand steadfast in upholding righteousness)




The national achievement above the entrance of the Durbar Hall in Udaipur and a goldcoin of Udaipur (1928) showing the seal of Mewar.


National Flag and Royal Ensign as displayed nowadays in the Durbar Hall of Udaipur




Mewar Armed Force


The “Procession to Eklinghi” miniature (detail) 

Relatively much is known about the heraldry of the Mewar Armed Force.

The armed force of Mewar is said to trace its origin back to 1303.

A picture of “Maharana Bhim Singh of Mewar in Procession to Eklingji” dated 1802 shows some ensigns of this armed force.

In the first place there is the war ensign consisting of a red rectangular triangular cloth (not shown on the detail).

The ensigns of the infantry and of the cavalry are triangular, the first red, charged with a yellow kutar, the second of three piles orange, red and orange, the red pile also charged with a yellow kutar.

Two infantry units have rectangular ensigns, the first red, charged with a golden sword per fess, a sun radiant, a crescent-and-star and two stars, within a green bordure, the second orange with the same charges and bordure.

Behind these infantry ensigns a banner is displayed, consisting of a white forked triangular flag charged with a red Hanuman, a crescent-and-star and a sun radiant. This may be the Royal banner.

This picture is the more interesting as it shows the intricate and precious headdresses of the Mewar generals. Also, the uniforms of the Mewar army are visible.

After Mewar had entered into alliance with the British new ensigns were designed for the infantry and the cavalry. They do not differ very much from the examples given on the picture of 1802.

 


These modern reconstructions of the ensigns show an orange triangular flag charged with a faced sun and a kutar. This flag is called the “royal standard”.

And a red triangular flag charged with a kutar between a sun and a crescent. This flag is called the standard of Mewar State.

Indeed, the faced sun should be the royal emblem and the sun and the crescent the symbols of the Mewar kingdom and the state. This would mean, taking the flags on the Procession to Eklingi picture into account, that, in the time of the protectorate, the cavalry was his majesty’s own armed force and that the infantry was the army of the kingdom, paid by the government.

The ensigns of the two infantry units from this time remain to be discovered.



Also, it is said, the royal banners introduced in 1874 were red with a faced sun, the first on a forked flag the second on a flag of two triangles. These we can compare with the war ensign and the royal standard on the Procession to Eklingi picture. It implies that the kingdom and its institutions all had become royal as had been the case in Great Britain itself for many centuries.

These flags are the predecessors of the flags in the preceding section.


Modern Times


Emblem of the Mewar Army, Udaipur.

In modern times the kutar as a symbol of the armed force was replaced by two swords in saltire in combination with the royal emblem. This probably was borrowed from the British army which had, after long deliberations, adopted two swords in saltire and the royal crest as its emblem in 1938.



Arms of the Supreme Commander of Mewar:

Gules, a sun radiant charged with two swords in saltire and the head of Surya, Or.

In the Mewar Armed Force we meet again the two infantry- and the single cavalry units.

In the interbellum (1939) the Udaipur (Mewar) State Forces consisted of one squadron of Lancers and two battalions of Infantry. They were the:


Mewar Lancers

Mewar Bhupal Infantry (named after Bhupal Singh (1930-’55))

Mewar Sajjan Infantry (named after Sajjan Singh (1874-’84))

Mewar Bhupal Training Company and were all stationed in Udaipur.


The 1st Mewar Infantry, tracing its origin to 1303, was first affiliated to the Rajputana Rifles and came over to the Grenadiers in 1953 as the 9th Battalion (Mewar).


The arms of the Mewar Supreme Commander on the grill of his Rolls Royce

and ensigns of Mewar armed units hanging in Durbar Hall, Udaipur.

Other ensigns in the Durbar Hall of Udaipur show the Armed Force emblem on a red cloth. Still others have the outlines of the national achievement on a red background.


The first royal structure that was built in the City palace Udaipur complex was 'Rai Angan', the royal courtyard. After the death of Maharana Udai Singh II, his son Maharana Pratap took over Udaipur.  Built in granite and marble, City Palace complex is worth admiring for its perfect blend of medieval, European and Chinese architecture. The several palaces in the complex stand magnificently behind t. 

Located at an elevation of 1,962 ft, the City Palace complex was built by the 22 generations of Sisodia Rajputs over an extensive period of time starting from the year of 1559. 


Fateh Prakash Palace located in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan is one of the important tourist places of Udaipur. The palace was formerly the residence of the Udaipur Raj family, which is currently converted into a heritage hotel. Fateh Prakash Palace is located on the eastern shore of Lake Pichola.
History of Fateh prakesh palace Udaipur Rajasthan


Palace Fateh Prakash was built by Maharaja Fateh Singh in his reign from1884 to 1930. In 1909, Viceroy of India Lord Minto laid the foundation stone of Fateh Prakash Palace.


Fateh Prakash Palace is one of the major buildings of Udaipur. Fateh Prakash Palace is a beautiful and two-storied palace, in which its Durbar Hall is a major attraction of this palace. It is said that Maharaja Fateh Singh built this palace keeping Rajasthani style and art in mind.


There is one turret at each of the four corners of the palace, which is equipped with domed umbrellas. The main features of the palace are its corridors and pillars which offer a wonderful example of Rajasthani art and culture.


Palace Fateh Prakash is decorated with interior miniature paintings, paintings, royal artifacts and an arsenal of the Mewar dynasty. Its crystal gallery is rare and has the most expensive collection of crystals, including items made of crystals such as tables and bedding.


The rich history, stunning paintings, and carvings of the Palace Fateh Prakash, the royal court of the nobles of Mewar of Fateh Prakash Mahal, take you back to historical times on view.


The City Palace Museum is the jewel in the crown of the Udaipur City Palace Complex. It is here that you can immerse yourself in the history of the Maharanas of Mewar, and really get a feel for their culture and how royalty lived. The sprawling museum is actually a series of palaces, including the Mardana Mahal (palace for the royal men) and Zenana Mahal (palace for the royal women).

Construction on the City Palace started in 1559, making it the oldest part of the City Palace Complex. The various rulers continued the work over four and a half centuries, in a number of phases, giving rise to the Mughal and British influences in the palace architecture.


In 1969, the City Palace was opened to the public as the City Palace Museum. This was done out of necessity, in order to generate income and maintain the building after India became a democracy, and royal rulers had to give up their states and fend for themselves. The Museum is now overseen by the Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation. The annual World Living Heritage Festival, which takes place at the City Place, is also an initiative of this foundation to preserve Indian heritage and culture.

The current custodian of the House of Mewar, Shriji Arvind Singh Mewar, hasn't merely been content with restoring the City Palace to its former glory. Ongoing projects are underway to develop it into a world class museum.

Once such project is the exhibition of priceless royal family photographs. The interior of the Museum is also adorned with priceless artwork, which documents royal history before Udaipur got its first camera in 1857. A collection of personal portraits of Shriji Arvind Singh Mewar is on display as well. Recently, the world's first silver museum and gallery of royal musical instruments were added.


Being the largest part of the Udaipur City Palace Complex, the City Palace Museum stretches 33 meters high, 333 meters long, and 90 meters wide. Exploring the museum is like negotiating your way through a maze. There's a good reason for this. It was designed to hinder enemy attack.
Museum Opening Times and Tickets

The Udaipur City Palace Museum is open daily from 9.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m, except on the day of the Holi festival. Tickets cost 300 rupees for adults and 100 rupees for children. The price is the same for both foreigners and Indians. Audio guides can be hired for 200 rupees. Ticket counters are situated at the two City Palace entrance gates, at Badi Pol and Shitla Mata. Ticket sales close at 4.45 p.m.

It's important to note that the museum gets super crowded during festivals (particularly Diwali), public holidays, weekends, and peak tourist season (from October to March). The lines are often very long and many visitors complain of claustrophobia inside some of the smaller rooms.

Visitors should also keep in mind that there are many stairs and narrow stairwells inside the museum. Those with limited mobility may not be able to access all areas.

Take this visual tour of the Udaipur City Palace Museum to discover some of its highlights.

Entrance and Torans


The main entrance to the Udaipur City Palace Complex is known as Badi Pol. After passing through the entrance, you'll find yourself in a courtyard. On the east wall, there are eight stone ornamental arches.

Known as "torans", these arches were constructed by Rana Jagat Singh I, during the period 1628 to 1652. They mark the spot where, on special occasions such as visits to holy places, the rulers were weighted against gold or silver. The equivalent value was distributed to the needy.

Head through Tripoliya, the triple arched gate made of marble, and you'll reach Manek Chowk.

Toran Pol



As you exit the Udaipur City Palace Museum you'll pass though Toran Pol, a gateway which leads from Moti Chowk (where the main entrance to the Zenana Mahal is located) into Manek Chowk. It was constructed by Maharana Karan Singhji.

The structure hanging in front of the Toran Pol is traditionally touched by the royal bridegroom with his sword, before entering the bride's house on his wedding evening.


Manek Chowk


Manek Chowk is perhaps the most recognizable feature of the Udaipur City Palace Museum. This huge grassy courtyard fronts the main entrance to the Mardana Mahal, Palace of Kings.

Constructed by Rana Karan Singhji from 1620 to 1628, Manek Chowk was used for public meetings, ceremonial processions, horse cavalry, elephant parades, and other festivals. The courtyard now has a beautifully laid out Mughal style garden, created in 1992. To this day, it's still used by the Mewar royal family for festivals and special celebrations.

The main entrance to the Palace building can be seen on the left of the photo. It's adorned with the Royal Crest of the House of Mewar. On the crest is a Rajput warrior and Bhil tribal, along with the rising sun. The motto is, "The Almighty protect those who stand steadfast in upholding righteousness". The sun symbol represents Surya the Sun God, whom the Maharanas of Mewar draw their linage from.

To the right of the palace building is the triple arched gate, known as Tripoliya. It was built in 1711, almost 100 years after Manek Chowk and Badi Pol (the big entrance), by Rana Sangram Singhji II.

Manek Chowk has very much stepped into the modern age now. There are book, clothing, and souvenir shops, as well as the Palki Khana restaurant. A sound and light show is also held there every evening.

However, with a little imagination, you can picture the days of old. A row of low level openings can be seen where the shopping arcade now lies. They housed elephants and horses. Elephants also used to be tied near the car park, where there are elephant beds and posts. Palanquins (covered hand carried chairs) were kept where the Palki Khana restaurant is now located.

If you're looking for a regal wedding venue, it's possible to get married in Manek Chowk.

Ganesh Deodhi

Sharell Cook.

After walking through the entrance to the Palace of Kings and Udaipur City Palace Museum, the Assembly Hall opens to Ganesh Chowk.

At the east end, you'll find Ganesh Deodhi -- an ornate idol of Lord Ganesh, the remover of obstacles and Lord of success.

The idol, sculptured from marble, was made by Rana Karan Singhji in 1620. The fine glass inlay work around it is absolutely superb.

From here, the staircase climbs upwards to Rajya Angan, the royal courtyard. Of note, on the top of the staircase is the famous painting of Bapa Rawal, the founder of the Mewar Dynasty in 734. He is pictured accepting the trusteeship of the kingdom from his guru, Harit Rashi.

Pratap Gallery



Inside the Rajya Angan (royal courtyard) of the Udaipur City Palace Complex is a gallery devoted to the legendary warrior Maharana Pratap and his horse Chetak. Pratap Gallery in the Royal Courtyard of Udaipur City Palace which is full with Maharana Pratap  and his favorite Chetak (The name of the horse) photos. This gallery will also help you to know the total history of the battle between Mughals and Rajputs in 1576.

The gallery displays the original armor and weapons used by Maharana Pratap and Chetak during the great battle of Haldi Ghati in 1576, between the Rajputs and Mughals.


What's particularly fascinating is the elephant-like trunk worn by the horse. It served to disguise the horse as an elephant, to help avoid malicious attacks from other sword wielding elephants during the battle. Incredibly, elephants fought by holding mardana swords in their their trunks and slashing the enemy with them.

It was a wound from one of these swords that unfortunately killed Chetak, during the battle of Haldi Ghati. Legend has it that the horse reared up high and planted its hooves on the forehead of Imperial Mughal Commander Man Singh's elephant, while Maharana Pratap courageously attempted to slay him with a lance. Man Singh managed to duck, and the blow killed the mahout (elephant driver) instead. The horse was critically wounded in the melee that followed.


Badi Mahal



Badi Mahal, known as the Garden Palace, is the highest point in the Udaipur City Palace Museum. It was built during the reign of Rana Amar Singh II, in 1699. Its 104 intricately carved pillars have been made out of local marble. On the ceiling are cleverly fixed marble tiles, highlighting the amazing skill and craftsmanship of the local artisans.

Back in time, Badi Mahal was used for royal banquets on special occasions such as Holi, Diwali, Dussehra, birthdays of royal family members, and in honor of visiting dignitaries.

What makes Badi Mahal unique is its location. Despite being the highest point in the palace, it is actually at ground level. This has enabled plant life to flourish there. The courtyard is full of large shady trees, and is a peaceful place to relax and take in the palace surroundings. Its height also provides a great vantage point for viewing the town and Lake Pichola.


Badi Chitrashali Chowk



Badi Chitrashali Chowk lies between the courtyards of Badi Mahal and Mor Chowk, in the Udaipur City Palace Museum. It was constructed by Rana Sangram Singhji II, during 1710-1734.

The blue Chinese tiles, colored glass, and wall murals make Badi Chitrashali Chowk a bright and cheery place to be. Indeed, it was used as an entertainment space by the kings. Music and dance performances, and private parties were held there.

Badi Chitrashali Chowk is a particularly memorable part of the Udaipur City Palace because of its mesmerizing views. Step out onto the balcony on one side and be greeted by a panoramic vista across the city of Udaipur. Peer through a window on the other side, and you'll be looking right at the Lake Palace hotel and Jag Mandir on Lake Pichola. It's magical!


Mor Chowk



The ornate Mor Chowk (Peacock Courtyard) is often referred to as the most spectacular courtyard of the Udaipur City Palace Museum. Five peacocks decorate the courtyard, which is also covered with beautiful glass inlay work. The kings held special audiences and dinners there.

Mor Chowk was constructed during the reign of Rana Karan Singhji. However, the glass inlay work and peacocks were added later, by Maharana Sajjan Singhji during 1874 to 1884. An astonishing 5,000 pieces of mosaic tiles have been used in creating the works of art.

The higher wall in the east of the courtyard sustained a great deal of weather damage over the years. In 2004, local artisans commenced restoring it and took 14 months to complete the task.

Mor Chowk is the last area in the Mardana Mahal (Palace of Kings). From here, a narrow passage will take you to the other half of the palace -- the Zenana Mahal (Queen's Palace).

It's also possible to get married in Mor Chowk.


Zenana Mahal and Chowmukha


An impressive part of the Zenana Mahal (Queen's Palace) is an open pavilion called Chowmukha. The Queen used to hold audiences here, with other royal ladies and ladies-in-waiting of the royal court, during special occasions and festivals. Banquets and other celebrations are still held there.

Chowmukha was built by Rana Sangram Singhji II during his reign from 1710-1734. The dome on top of the pavilion was added to commemorate the 1999-2000 millennium, and is known as the Millennium Dome.

To the east of the courtyard is the Osara, where royal weddings are solemnized. You can get married in the Zenana Mahal as well.


Zenana Mahal Interiors



Inside the Zenana Mahal, it's possible to walk through the queen's chambers. The rooms have been beautifully restored and feature arts and crafts, frescoes, balconies, and alcoves. There's even a swing!


Kanch ki Burj




Possibly the most ornate and opulent part of the City Palace Museum, Kanch ki Burj is one of the many structures added by Manarana Karan Singhji, during his brief reign from 1620 to 1628. The exquisite dome ceiling of this small chamber is covered in glass and mirrors.

"Sheesh Mahal"

Sheesh Mahal in the City Palace built by Maharana Pratap for his wife during the 17th century. The Mor Chowk is the extraordinary and flawless beauty of the City Palace under the King’s Palace. 


It is said that almost 5,000 pieces of glass or stone mosaic tiles have been used to design this Peacock Courtyard. It was built in the 18th century by Maharana Sajjan Singhji. 


Moti Mahal




Head through the antique ivory doors to Moti Mahal (Pearl Palace), and you'll find yourself surrounded by mirrored walls and stained glass windows. It creates an astonishing array of reflections. This section was also built by Maharana Karan Singhji and used as his private residence. Maharana Jawan Singhji added to the ornamentation 200 years later.


City Palace Galleries




The captivating City Palace Museum galleries are filled with priceless regal memorabilia. Two of the most important ones are the Silver Gallery and Music Gallery.

The Silver Gallery contains numerous precious pieces of silverware used by the royal household. The highlights include a crib for newborn babies, chariot to carry religious idols when taken out in procession, a horse cart, and mandap pavilion for wedding ceremonies.


On display in the Symphony of Mewar Music Gallery, located in the Zenana Mahal, are many antique musical instruments belonging to Mewar kings.